Question Description
One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. But why should governments consider a carbon tax when they could control emissions by establishing energy efficiency and conservation standards, by legislating against coal use, or by increasing investment in nuclear? The great virtue of such a tax is that it would provide incentives for industry to achieve emission reductions. Because oil emits more carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than does natural gas, and coal more than oil, a carbon tax would vary with the type of fuel. Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less-polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax and also to reduce the total use of energy.Q. Which one of the following circumstances would most seriously undermine the conclusion “Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less- polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax”a)The fuel taxed the highest rate costs considerably less to buy than fuels taxed at lower rates.b)The goal set by the Toronto Conference cannot be reached unless each fuel it taxed at a much higher rate.c)The tax on coal represents a much greater cost increase than does the tax on oil or gas.d)It is discovered that gas produces even less carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than was previously thought.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. But why should governments consider a carbon tax when they could control emissions by establishing energy efficiency and conservation standards, by legislating against coal use, or by increasing investment in nuclear? The great virtue of such a tax is that it would provide incentives for industry to achieve emission reductions. Because oil emits more carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than does natural gas, and coal more than oil, a carbon tax would vary with the type of fuel. Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less-polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax and also to reduce the total use of energy.Q. Which one of the following circumstances would most seriously undermine the conclusion “Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less- polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax”a)The fuel taxed the highest rate costs considerably less to buy than fuels taxed at lower rates.b)The goal set by the Toronto Conference cannot be reached unless each fuel it taxed at a much higher rate.c)The tax on coal represents a much greater cost increase than does the tax on oil or gas.d)It is discovered that gas produces even less carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than was previously thought.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. But why should governments consider a carbon tax when they could control emissions by establishing energy efficiency and conservation standards, by legislating against coal use, or by increasing investment in nuclear? The great virtue of such a tax is that it would provide incentives for industry to achieve emission reductions. Because oil emits more carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than does natural gas, and coal more than oil, a carbon tax would vary with the type of fuel. Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less-polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax and also to reduce the total use of energy.Q. Which one of the following circumstances would most seriously undermine the conclusion “Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less- polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax”a)The fuel taxed the highest rate costs considerably less to buy than fuels taxed at lower rates.b)The goal set by the Toronto Conference cannot be reached unless each fuel it taxed at a much higher rate.c)The tax on coal represents a much greater cost increase than does the tax on oil or gas.d)It is discovered that gas produces even less carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than was previously thought.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. But why should governments consider a carbon tax when they could control emissions by establishing energy efficiency and conservation standards, by legislating against coal use, or by increasing investment in nuclear? The great virtue of such a tax is that it would provide incentives for industry to achieve emission reductions. Because oil emits more carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than does natural gas, and coal more than oil, a carbon tax would vary with the type of fuel. Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less-polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax and also to reduce the total use of energy.Q. Which one of the following circumstances would most seriously undermine the conclusion “Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less- polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax”a)The fuel taxed the highest rate costs considerably less to buy than fuels taxed at lower rates.b)The goal set by the Toronto Conference cannot be reached unless each fuel it taxed at a much higher rate.c)The tax on coal represents a much greater cost increase than does the tax on oil or gas.d)It is discovered that gas produces even less carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than was previously thought.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. But why should governments consider a carbon tax when they could control emissions by establishing energy efficiency and conservation standards, by legislating against coal use, or by increasing investment in nuclear? The great virtue of such a tax is that it would provide incentives for industry to achieve emission reductions. Because oil emits more carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than does natural gas, and coal more than oil, a carbon tax would vary with the type of fuel. Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less-polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax and also to reduce the total use of energy.Q. Which one of the following circumstances would most seriously undermine the conclusion “Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less- polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax”a)The fuel taxed the highest rate costs considerably less to buy than fuels taxed at lower rates.b)The goal set by the Toronto Conference cannot be reached unless each fuel it taxed at a much higher rate.c)The tax on coal represents a much greater cost increase than does the tax on oil or gas.d)It is discovered that gas produces even less carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than was previously thought.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. But why should governments consider a carbon tax when they could control emissions by establishing energy efficiency and conservation standards, by legislating against coal use, or by increasing investment in nuclear? The great virtue of such a tax is that it would provide incentives for industry to achieve emission reductions. Because oil emits more carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than does natural gas, and coal more than oil, a carbon tax would vary with the type of fuel. Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less-polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax and also to reduce the total use of energy.Q. Which one of the following circumstances would most seriously undermine the conclusion “Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less- polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax”a)The fuel taxed the highest rate costs considerably less to buy than fuels taxed at lower rates.b)The goal set by the Toronto Conference cannot be reached unless each fuel it taxed at a much higher rate.c)The tax on coal represents a much greater cost increase than does the tax on oil or gas.d)It is discovered that gas produces even less carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than was previously thought.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. But why should governments consider a carbon tax when they could control emissions by establishing energy efficiency and conservation standards, by legislating against coal use, or by increasing investment in nuclear? The great virtue of such a tax is that it would provide incentives for industry to achieve emission reductions. Because oil emits more carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than does natural gas, and coal more than oil, a carbon tax would vary with the type of fuel. Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less-polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax and also to reduce the total use of energy.Q. Which one of the following circumstances would most seriously undermine the conclusion “Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less- polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax”a)The fuel taxed the highest rate costs considerably less to buy than fuels taxed at lower rates.b)The goal set by the Toronto Conference cannot be reached unless each fuel it taxed at a much higher rate.c)The tax on coal represents a much greater cost increase than does the tax on oil or gas.d)It is discovered that gas produces even less carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than was previously thought.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. But why should governments consider a carbon tax when they could control emissions by establishing energy efficiency and conservation standards, by legislating against coal use, or by increasing investment in nuclear? The great virtue of such a tax is that it would provide incentives for industry to achieve emission reductions. Because oil emits more carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than does natural gas, and coal more than oil, a carbon tax would vary with the type of fuel. Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less-polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax and also to reduce the total use of energy.Q. Which one of the following circumstances would most seriously undermine the conclusion “Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less- polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax”a)The fuel taxed the highest rate costs considerably less to buy than fuels taxed at lower rates.b)The goal set by the Toronto Conference cannot be reached unless each fuel it taxed at a much higher rate.c)The tax on coal represents a much greater cost increase than does the tax on oil or gas.d)It is discovered that gas produces even less carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than was previously thought.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. But why should governments consider a carbon tax when they could control emissions by establishing energy efficiency and conservation standards, by legislating against coal use, or by increasing investment in nuclear? The great virtue of such a tax is that it would provide incentives for industry to achieve emission reductions. Because oil emits more carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than does natural gas, and coal more than oil, a carbon tax would vary with the type of fuel. Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less-polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax and also to reduce the total use of energy.Q. Which one of the following circumstances would most seriously undermine the conclusion “Such a tax would induce industry to substitute less- polluting fuels for those carrying a higher tax”a)The fuel taxed the highest rate costs considerably less to buy than fuels taxed at lower rates.b)The goal set by the Toronto Conference cannot be reached unless each fuel it taxed at a much higher rate.c)The tax on coal represents a much greater cost increase than does the tax on oil or gas.d)It is discovered that gas produces even less carbon dioxide per unit of energy generated than was previously thought.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.