Question Description
One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. It is not clear how high taxes imposed on carbon dioxide emissions should be or what its economic and environmental implications would be. At first glance, it is not difficult to estimate roughly the size of the tax needed to effect a given level of emission reduction. One writer estimate, for example, that a tax of 41 percent on the price of coal, 33 percent on oil, and 25 percent on gas would reduce the United Kingdom’s emissions by 20 percent (using 1988as the base year) by the year 2005, the target recommended by the 1988 Toronto Conference. These numbers are based on the assumption that all countries will behave cooperatively in imposing a carbon tax.Q. According to the passage, the size of the carbon tax levied on a given fuel would vary with thea)Amount of that fuel used by a particular industryb)Amount of pollution caused by the fuel being taxedc)Size of the industries using the fuel being taxedd)Effect that the tax would have on a country’s economyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. It is not clear how high taxes imposed on carbon dioxide emissions should be or what its economic and environmental implications would be. At first glance, it is not difficult to estimate roughly the size of the tax needed to effect a given level of emission reduction. One writer estimate, for example, that a tax of 41 percent on the price of coal, 33 percent on oil, and 25 percent on gas would reduce the United Kingdom’s emissions by 20 percent (using 1988as the base year) by the year 2005, the target recommended by the 1988 Toronto Conference. These numbers are based on the assumption that all countries will behave cooperatively in imposing a carbon tax.Q. According to the passage, the size of the carbon tax levied on a given fuel would vary with thea)Amount of that fuel used by a particular industryb)Amount of pollution caused by the fuel being taxedc)Size of the industries using the fuel being taxedd)Effect that the tax would have on a country’s economyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. It is not clear how high taxes imposed on carbon dioxide emissions should be or what its economic and environmental implications would be. At first glance, it is not difficult to estimate roughly the size of the tax needed to effect a given level of emission reduction. One writer estimate, for example, that a tax of 41 percent on the price of coal, 33 percent on oil, and 25 percent on gas would reduce the United Kingdom’s emissions by 20 percent (using 1988as the base year) by the year 2005, the target recommended by the 1988 Toronto Conference. These numbers are based on the assumption that all countries will behave cooperatively in imposing a carbon tax.Q. According to the passage, the size of the carbon tax levied on a given fuel would vary with thea)Amount of that fuel used by a particular industryb)Amount of pollution caused by the fuel being taxedc)Size of the industries using the fuel being taxedd)Effect that the tax would have on a country’s economyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. It is not clear how high taxes imposed on carbon dioxide emissions should be or what its economic and environmental implications would be. At first glance, it is not difficult to estimate roughly the size of the tax needed to effect a given level of emission reduction. One writer estimate, for example, that a tax of 41 percent on the price of coal, 33 percent on oil, and 25 percent on gas would reduce the United Kingdom’s emissions by 20 percent (using 1988as the base year) by the year 2005, the target recommended by the 1988 Toronto Conference. These numbers are based on the assumption that all countries will behave cooperatively in imposing a carbon tax.Q. According to the passage, the size of the carbon tax levied on a given fuel would vary with thea)Amount of that fuel used by a particular industryb)Amount of pollution caused by the fuel being taxedc)Size of the industries using the fuel being taxedd)Effect that the tax would have on a country’s economyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. It is not clear how high taxes imposed on carbon dioxide emissions should be or what its economic and environmental implications would be. At first glance, it is not difficult to estimate roughly the size of the tax needed to effect a given level of emission reduction. One writer estimate, for example, that a tax of 41 percent on the price of coal, 33 percent on oil, and 25 percent on gas would reduce the United Kingdom’s emissions by 20 percent (using 1988as the base year) by the year 2005, the target recommended by the 1988 Toronto Conference. These numbers are based on the assumption that all countries will behave cooperatively in imposing a carbon tax.Q. According to the passage, the size of the carbon tax levied on a given fuel would vary with thea)Amount of that fuel used by a particular industryb)Amount of pollution caused by the fuel being taxedc)Size of the industries using the fuel being taxedd)Effect that the tax would have on a country’s economyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. It is not clear how high taxes imposed on carbon dioxide emissions should be or what its economic and environmental implications would be. At first glance, it is not difficult to estimate roughly the size of the tax needed to effect a given level of emission reduction. One writer estimate, for example, that a tax of 41 percent on the price of coal, 33 percent on oil, and 25 percent on gas would reduce the United Kingdom’s emissions by 20 percent (using 1988as the base year) by the year 2005, the target recommended by the 1988 Toronto Conference. These numbers are based on the assumption that all countries will behave cooperatively in imposing a carbon tax.Q. According to the passage, the size of the carbon tax levied on a given fuel would vary with thea)Amount of that fuel used by a particular industryb)Amount of pollution caused by the fuel being taxedc)Size of the industries using the fuel being taxedd)Effect that the tax would have on a country’s economyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. It is not clear how high taxes imposed on carbon dioxide emissions should be or what its economic and environmental implications would be. At first glance, it is not difficult to estimate roughly the size of the tax needed to effect a given level of emission reduction. One writer estimate, for example, that a tax of 41 percent on the price of coal, 33 percent on oil, and 25 percent on gas would reduce the United Kingdom’s emissions by 20 percent (using 1988as the base year) by the year 2005, the target recommended by the 1988 Toronto Conference. These numbers are based on the assumption that all countries will behave cooperatively in imposing a carbon tax.Q. According to the passage, the size of the carbon tax levied on a given fuel would vary with thea)Amount of that fuel used by a particular industryb)Amount of pollution caused by the fuel being taxedc)Size of the industries using the fuel being taxedd)Effect that the tax would have on a country’s economyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. It is not clear how high taxes imposed on carbon dioxide emissions should be or what its economic and environmental implications would be. At first glance, it is not difficult to estimate roughly the size of the tax needed to effect a given level of emission reduction. One writer estimate, for example, that a tax of 41 percent on the price of coal, 33 percent on oil, and 25 percent on gas would reduce the United Kingdom’s emissions by 20 percent (using 1988as the base year) by the year 2005, the target recommended by the 1988 Toronto Conference. These numbers are based on the assumption that all countries will behave cooperatively in imposing a carbon tax.Q. According to the passage, the size of the carbon tax levied on a given fuel would vary with thea)Amount of that fuel used by a particular industryb)Amount of pollution caused by the fuel being taxedc)Size of the industries using the fuel being taxedd)Effect that the tax would have on a country’s economyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice One-way governments can decrease air pollution is to impose a tax on industrial carbon dioxide emissions. It is not clear how high taxes imposed on carbon dioxide emissions should be or what its economic and environmental implications would be. At first glance, it is not difficult to estimate roughly the size of the tax needed to effect a given level of emission reduction. One writer estimate, for example, that a tax of 41 percent on the price of coal, 33 percent on oil, and 25 percent on gas would reduce the United Kingdom’s emissions by 20 percent (using 1988as the base year) by the year 2005, the target recommended by the 1988 Toronto Conference. These numbers are based on the assumption that all countries will behave cooperatively in imposing a carbon tax.Q. According to the passage, the size of the carbon tax levied on a given fuel would vary with thea)Amount of that fuel used by a particular industryb)Amount of pollution caused by the fuel being taxedc)Size of the industries using the fuel being taxedd)Effect that the tax would have on a country’s economyCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.