Question Description
Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.Article 21 of the Constitution provides that no person shall be deprived of his right to life and liberty. It also includes citizens/persons right to leisure, right to breathe fresh air, right to water, right to travel etc. Right to privacy has also been held to be an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Baba Vasudev held a camp in Pragati Maidan in Delhi with the motto Remove Corruption. He had been granted permission to hold satyagraha camp at Pragati Maidan which had more than fifty thousand men and women as his followers. Convinced that Baba Vasudev would not finish the protest, at 11:30 p.m., a team of police informed Baba Vasudev that the permission to hold the camp has been withdrawn and that he would be detained. At 12:30 a.m., a large number of police personnel reached Pragati Maidan. At that time, the supporters were peacefully sleeping. By 2:10 a.m., almost all the supporters had been driven out of the Pragati Maidan. Baba Vasudev filed a writ against the brutality of police action towards his followers who were sleeping, since sleeping is a part of the fundamental right to privacy. Decide.a)The demands of Baba Vasudev had been fulfilled and his permission to hold the camp was withdrawn but he still continued to protest with his followers. Thus, the action of the police was justified as the police had to maintain public order and security. It was in accordance with the procedure established by law.b)The action of police was not justified as there was no breach of conduct by the supporters and the police still resorted to blows on them while they were sleeping at 12:30 am.c)The action of police was not justified as the followers had right to privacy which included right to sleep peacefully at night which is guaranteed by article 21 of the Constitution. The matter could have been taken up next morning rather than at 12:30 am at midnight.d)The action of police was not justified as Baba Vasudev had taken all necessary permissions. The sudden retraction of the permission from holding the camp is malafide and violates the freedom of association and speech and expression under the Constitution.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.Article 21 of the Constitution provides that no person shall be deprived of his right to life and liberty. It also includes citizens/persons right to leisure, right to breathe fresh air, right to water, right to travel etc. Right to privacy has also been held to be an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Baba Vasudev held a camp in Pragati Maidan in Delhi with the motto Remove Corruption. He had been granted permission to hold satyagraha camp at Pragati Maidan which had more than fifty thousand men and women as his followers. Convinced that Baba Vasudev would not finish the protest, at 11:30 p.m., a team of police informed Baba Vasudev that the permission to hold the camp has been withdrawn and that he would be detained. At 12:30 a.m., a large number of police personnel reached Pragati Maidan. At that time, the supporters were peacefully sleeping. By 2:10 a.m., almost all the supporters had been driven out of the Pragati Maidan. Baba Vasudev filed a writ against the brutality of police action towards his followers who were sleeping, since sleeping is a part of the fundamental right to privacy. Decide.a)The demands of Baba Vasudev had been fulfilled and his permission to hold the camp was withdrawn but he still continued to protest with his followers. Thus, the action of the police was justified as the police had to maintain public order and security. It was in accordance with the procedure established by law.b)The action of police was not justified as there was no breach of conduct by the supporters and the police still resorted to blows on them while they were sleeping at 12:30 am.c)The action of police was not justified as the followers had right to privacy which included right to sleep peacefully at night which is guaranteed by article 21 of the Constitution. The matter could have been taken up next morning rather than at 12:30 am at midnight.d)The action of police was not justified as Baba Vasudev had taken all necessary permissions. The sudden retraction of the permission from holding the camp is malafide and violates the freedom of association and speech and expression under the Constitution.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.Article 21 of the Constitution provides that no person shall be deprived of his right to life and liberty. It also includes citizens/persons right to leisure, right to breathe fresh air, right to water, right to travel etc. Right to privacy has also been held to be an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Baba Vasudev held a camp in Pragati Maidan in Delhi with the motto Remove Corruption. He had been granted permission to hold satyagraha camp at Pragati Maidan which had more than fifty thousand men and women as his followers. Convinced that Baba Vasudev would not finish the protest, at 11:30 p.m., a team of police informed Baba Vasudev that the permission to hold the camp has been withdrawn and that he would be detained. At 12:30 a.m., a large number of police personnel reached Pragati Maidan. At that time, the supporters were peacefully sleeping. By 2:10 a.m., almost all the supporters had been driven out of the Pragati Maidan. Baba Vasudev filed a writ against the brutality of police action towards his followers who were sleeping, since sleeping is a part of the fundamental right to privacy. Decide.a)The demands of Baba Vasudev had been fulfilled and his permission to hold the camp was withdrawn but he still continued to protest with his followers. Thus, the action of the police was justified as the police had to maintain public order and security. It was in accordance with the procedure established by law.b)The action of police was not justified as there was no breach of conduct by the supporters and the police still resorted to blows on them while they were sleeping at 12:30 am.c)The action of police was not justified as the followers had right to privacy which included right to sleep peacefully at night which is guaranteed by article 21 of the Constitution. The matter could have been taken up next morning rather than at 12:30 am at midnight.d)The action of police was not justified as Baba Vasudev had taken all necessary permissions. The sudden retraction of the permission from holding the camp is malafide and violates the freedom of association and speech and expression under the Constitution.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.Article 21 of the Constitution provides that no person shall be deprived of his right to life and liberty. It also includes citizens/persons right to leisure, right to breathe fresh air, right to water, right to travel etc. Right to privacy has also been held to be an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Baba Vasudev held a camp in Pragati Maidan in Delhi with the motto Remove Corruption. He had been granted permission to hold satyagraha camp at Pragati Maidan which had more than fifty thousand men and women as his followers. Convinced that Baba Vasudev would not finish the protest, at 11:30 p.m., a team of police informed Baba Vasudev that the permission to hold the camp has been withdrawn and that he would be detained. At 12:30 a.m., a large number of police personnel reached Pragati Maidan. At that time, the supporters were peacefully sleeping. By 2:10 a.m., almost all the supporters had been driven out of the Pragati Maidan. Baba Vasudev filed a writ against the brutality of police action towards his followers who were sleeping, since sleeping is a part of the fundamental right to privacy. Decide.a)The demands of Baba Vasudev had been fulfilled and his permission to hold the camp was withdrawn but he still continued to protest with his followers. Thus, the action of the police was justified as the police had to maintain public order and security. It was in accordance with the procedure established by law.b)The action of police was not justified as there was no breach of conduct by the supporters and the police still resorted to blows on them while they were sleeping at 12:30 am.c)The action of police was not justified as the followers had right to privacy which included right to sleep peacefully at night which is guaranteed by article 21 of the Constitution. The matter could have been taken up next morning rather than at 12:30 am at midnight.d)The action of police was not justified as Baba Vasudev had taken all necessary permissions. The sudden retraction of the permission from holding the camp is malafide and violates the freedom of association and speech and expression under the Constitution.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.Article 21 of the Constitution provides that no person shall be deprived of his right to life and liberty. It also includes citizens/persons right to leisure, right to breathe fresh air, right to water, right to travel etc. Right to privacy has also been held to be an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Baba Vasudev held a camp in Pragati Maidan in Delhi with the motto Remove Corruption. He had been granted permission to hold satyagraha camp at Pragati Maidan which had more than fifty thousand men and women as his followers. Convinced that Baba Vasudev would not finish the protest, at 11:30 p.m., a team of police informed Baba Vasudev that the permission to hold the camp has been withdrawn and that he would be detained. At 12:30 a.m., a large number of police personnel reached Pragati Maidan. At that time, the supporters were peacefully sleeping. By 2:10 a.m., almost all the supporters had been driven out of the Pragati Maidan. Baba Vasudev filed a writ against the brutality of police action towards his followers who were sleeping, since sleeping is a part of the fundamental right to privacy. Decide.a)The demands of Baba Vasudev had been fulfilled and his permission to hold the camp was withdrawn but he still continued to protest with his followers. Thus, the action of the police was justified as the police had to maintain public order and security. It was in accordance with the procedure established by law.b)The action of police was not justified as there was no breach of conduct by the supporters and the police still resorted to blows on them while they were sleeping at 12:30 am.c)The action of police was not justified as the followers had right to privacy which included right to sleep peacefully at night which is guaranteed by article 21 of the Constitution. The matter could have been taken up next morning rather than at 12:30 am at midnight.d)The action of police was not justified as Baba Vasudev had taken all necessary permissions. The sudden retraction of the permission from holding the camp is malafide and violates the freedom of association and speech and expression under the Constitution.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.Article 21 of the Constitution provides that no person shall be deprived of his right to life and liberty. It also includes citizens/persons right to leisure, right to breathe fresh air, right to water, right to travel etc. Right to privacy has also been held to be an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Baba Vasudev held a camp in Pragati Maidan in Delhi with the motto Remove Corruption. He had been granted permission to hold satyagraha camp at Pragati Maidan which had more than fifty thousand men and women as his followers. Convinced that Baba Vasudev would not finish the protest, at 11:30 p.m., a team of police informed Baba Vasudev that the permission to hold the camp has been withdrawn and that he would be detained. At 12:30 a.m., a large number of police personnel reached Pragati Maidan. At that time, the supporters were peacefully sleeping. By 2:10 a.m., almost all the supporters had been driven out of the Pragati Maidan. Baba Vasudev filed a writ against the brutality of police action towards his followers who were sleeping, since sleeping is a part of the fundamental right to privacy. Decide.a)The demands of Baba Vasudev had been fulfilled and his permission to hold the camp was withdrawn but he still continued to protest with his followers. Thus, the action of the police was justified as the police had to maintain public order and security. It was in accordance with the procedure established by law.b)The action of police was not justified as there was no breach of conduct by the supporters and the police still resorted to blows on them while they were sleeping at 12:30 am.c)The action of police was not justified as the followers had right to privacy which included right to sleep peacefully at night which is guaranteed by article 21 of the Constitution. The matter could have been taken up next morning rather than at 12:30 am at midnight.d)The action of police was not justified as Baba Vasudev had taken all necessary permissions. The sudden retraction of the permission from holding the camp is malafide and violates the freedom of association and speech and expression under the Constitution.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.Article 21 of the Constitution provides that no person shall be deprived of his right to life and liberty. It also includes citizens/persons right to leisure, right to breathe fresh air, right to water, right to travel etc. Right to privacy has also been held to be an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Baba Vasudev held a camp in Pragati Maidan in Delhi with the motto Remove Corruption. He had been granted permission to hold satyagraha camp at Pragati Maidan which had more than fifty thousand men and women as his followers. Convinced that Baba Vasudev would not finish the protest, at 11:30 p.m., a team of police informed Baba Vasudev that the permission to hold the camp has been withdrawn and that he would be detained. At 12:30 a.m., a large number of police personnel reached Pragati Maidan. At that time, the supporters were peacefully sleeping. By 2:10 a.m., almost all the supporters had been driven out of the Pragati Maidan. Baba Vasudev filed a writ against the brutality of police action towards his followers who were sleeping, since sleeping is a part of the fundamental right to privacy. Decide.a)The demands of Baba Vasudev had been fulfilled and his permission to hold the camp was withdrawn but he still continued to protest with his followers. Thus, the action of the police was justified as the police had to maintain public order and security. It was in accordance with the procedure established by law.b)The action of police was not justified as there was no breach of conduct by the supporters and the police still resorted to blows on them while they were sleeping at 12:30 am.c)The action of police was not justified as the followers had right to privacy which included right to sleep peacefully at night which is guaranteed by article 21 of the Constitution. The matter could have been taken up next morning rather than at 12:30 am at midnight.d)The action of police was not justified as Baba Vasudev had taken all necessary permissions. The sudden retraction of the permission from holding the camp is malafide and violates the freedom of association and speech and expression under the Constitution.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.Article 21 of the Constitution provides that no person shall be deprived of his right to life and liberty. It also includes citizens/persons right to leisure, right to breathe fresh air, right to water, right to travel etc. Right to privacy has also been held to be an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Baba Vasudev held a camp in Pragati Maidan in Delhi with the motto Remove Corruption. He had been granted permission to hold satyagraha camp at Pragati Maidan which had more than fifty thousand men and women as his followers. Convinced that Baba Vasudev would not finish the protest, at 11:30 p.m., a team of police informed Baba Vasudev that the permission to hold the camp has been withdrawn and that he would be detained. At 12:30 a.m., a large number of police personnel reached Pragati Maidan. At that time, the supporters were peacefully sleeping. By 2:10 a.m., almost all the supporters had been driven out of the Pragati Maidan. Baba Vasudev filed a writ against the brutality of police action towards his followers who were sleeping, since sleeping is a part of the fundamental right to privacy. Decide.a)The demands of Baba Vasudev had been fulfilled and his permission to hold the camp was withdrawn but he still continued to protest with his followers. Thus, the action of the police was justified as the police had to maintain public order and security. It was in accordance with the procedure established by law.b)The action of police was not justified as there was no breach of conduct by the supporters and the police still resorted to blows on them while they were sleeping at 12:30 am.c)The action of police was not justified as the followers had right to privacy which included right to sleep peacefully at night which is guaranteed by article 21 of the Constitution. The matter could have been taken up next morning rather than at 12:30 am at midnight.d)The action of police was not justified as Baba Vasudev had taken all necessary permissions. The sudden retraction of the permission from holding the camp is malafide and violates the freedom of association and speech and expression under the Constitution.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Passage - 4The report by a German cybersecurity firm that medical details of millions of Indian patients were leaked and are freely available on the Internet is worrying. The firm listed 1.02 million studies of Indian patients and 121 million medical images, including CT Scans, MRIs and even photos of the patients, as being available. Such information has the potential to be mined for deeper data analysis and for creating profiles that could be used for social engineering, phishing and online identity theft, among other practices that thrive on the availability of such data on the Darknet - restricted computer networks which exchange information using means such as peer- to-peer file sharing. Public data leaks have been quite common in India - from government websites enabling the download of Aadhaar numbers to electoral data rolls being downloaded in bulk, among others. Unlike the data protection regulations in place in the European Union and in the U.S., India still lacks a comprehensive legal framework to protect data privacy.The Draft Personal Data Protection Bill 2019 is still to be tabled but could enable protection of privacy. The draft Bill follows up on the provisions recommended by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Committee in 2018. The committee sought to codify the relationship between individuals and firms/state institutions as one between "data principals" (whose information is collected) and "data fiduciaries" (those processing the data) so that privacy is safeguarded by design. While the 2019 version of the Bill seeks to retain the intent and many of the recommendations of the Justice Srikrishna committee, it has also diluted a few provisions. For example, while the Bill tasks the fiduciary to seek the consent in a free, informed, specific, clear form (and which is capable of being withdrawn later) from the principal, it has removed the proviso from the 2018 version of the Bill that said selling or transferring sensitive personal data by the fiduciary to a third party is an offence. There are other substantive issues with the Bill pertaining to the situations when state institutions are granted exemption from seeking consent from principals to process or obtain their information. Yet, considering the manner in which public data are being stored and used by both the state and private entities, a comprehensive Data Protection Act is the need of the hour.Q.Article 21 of the Constitution provides that no person shall be deprived of his right to life and liberty. It also includes citizens/persons right to leisure, right to breathe fresh air, right to water, right to travel etc. Right to privacy has also been held to be an integral part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. Baba Vasudev held a camp in Pragati Maidan in Delhi with the motto Remove Corruption. He had been granted permission to hold satyagraha camp at Pragati Maidan which had more than fifty thousand men and women as his followers. Convinced that Baba Vasudev would not finish the protest, at 11:30 p.m., a team of police informed Baba Vasudev that the permission to hold the camp has been withdrawn and that he would be detained. At 12:30 a.m., a large number of police personnel reached Pragati Maidan. At that time, the supporters were peacefully sleeping. By 2:10 a.m., almost all the supporters had been driven out of the Pragati Maidan. Baba Vasudev filed a writ against the brutality of police action towards his followers who were sleeping, since sleeping is a part of the fundamental right to privacy. Decide.a)The demands of Baba Vasudev had been fulfilled and his permission to hold the camp was withdrawn but he still continued to protest with his followers. Thus, the action of the police was justified as the police had to maintain public order and security. It was in accordance with the procedure established by law.b)The action of police was not justified as there was no breach of conduct by the supporters and the police still resorted to blows on them while they were sleeping at 12:30 am.c)The action of police was not justified as the followers had right to privacy which included right to sleep peacefully at night which is guaranteed by article 21 of the Constitution. The matter could have been taken up next morning rather than at 12:30 am at midnight.d)The action of police was not justified as Baba Vasudev had taken all necessary permissions. The sudden retraction of the permission from holding the camp is malafide and violates the freedom of association and speech and expression under the Constitution.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.