CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Passage - 5The International Court of Justice... Start Learning for Free
Passage - 5
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected India's demand that [1]'s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending a
Pakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJ's ruling that [1]'s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable.
"The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".
Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.
Q. What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?
  • a)
    Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justice
  • b)
    Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nations
  • c)
    Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations
  • d)
    Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakist...
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Kulbhushan Jadhav, an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf, to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected India's demand that Jadhav's conviction by a military court be dismissed. The law applied by the International Court of Justice is set out in the Statute of the International Court of Justice.
View all questions of this test
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the Convention on the basis of which India filed its claims before the International Court of Justice has been replaced with [3]. What is the name of the Convention?

Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.Pakistan arrested Mr. [1] on charges of spying in [4], which of the following provinces of Pakistan has been redacted with [4] in the passage above?

Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the person sentenced to death by Pakistan in April 2017 has been replaced with [1]. What is the name of the person?

Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.Who amongst the following Indian judges had not served as the judge of the International Court of Justice?

The preamble of the Vienna Convention states that “the rules of customary international law continue to govern matters not expressly regulated by the provisions of the present Convention”. Article 36 of the Convention expressly regulates the question of consular access to, and communication with, nationals of the sending State and makes no exception with regard to cases of espionage. Therefore, Article 36 of the Convention, and not customary international law, governs the matter at hand in the relations between the Parties.Point (vi) of the 2008 Agreement provides that “In case of arrest, detention or sentence made on political or security grounds, each side may examine the case on its merits”. It also recalls that, in the preamble of the Agreement, the Parties declared that they were “desirous of furthering the objective of humane treatment of nationals of either country arrested, detained or imprisoned in the other country”. The Court is of the view that point (vi) of the Agreement cannot be read as denying consular access in the case of an arrest, detention or sentence made on political or security grounds.(1). It has already found that Pakistan acted in breach of its obligations under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention:(i) by not informing Mr. Jadhav of his rights under Article 36, paragraph 1 ( b);(ii) by not informing India, without delay, of the arrest and detention of Mr. Jadhav; and(iii) by denying access to Mr. Jadhav by consular officers of India, contrary to their right, inter alia, to arrange for his legal representation.Pakistan is under an obligation to cease those acts and to comply fully with its obligations under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention. Consequently, Pakistan must inform Mr. Jadhav without further delay of his rights under Article 36, paragraph 1 (b), and allow Indian consular officers to have access to him and to arrange for his legal representation, as provided by Article 36, paragraph 1 (

Top Courses for CLAT

Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?a)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justiceb)Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nationsc)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relationsd)Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?a)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justiceb)Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nationsc)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relationsd)Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?a)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justiceb)Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nationsc)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relationsd)Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?a)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justiceb)Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nationsc)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relationsd)Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?a)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justiceb)Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nationsc)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relationsd)Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?a)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justiceb)Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nationsc)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relationsd)Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?a)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justiceb)Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nationsc)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relationsd)Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?a)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justiceb)Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nationsc)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relationsd)Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?a)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justiceb)Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nationsc)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relationsd)Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.What is the name of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) President redacted with [2] in the passage above and also law applied by the International Court of Justice in the above case is set out in which of the following?a)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and The Statute of the International Court of Justiceb)Chile Eboe-Osuji and Charter of the United Nationsc)Abdulqawi Ahmed Yusuf and Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relationsd)Chile Eboe-Osuji and International Covenant on Civil and Political RightsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev