Question Description
Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the Convention on the basis of which India filed its claims before the International Court of Justice has been replaced with [3]. What is the name of the Convention?a)Vienna Convention on Consular Relationsb)Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Genevac)Geneva Convention on the Law of Treatiesd)New York Convention on Consular RelationsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the Convention on the basis of which India filed its claims before the International Court of Justice has been replaced with [3]. What is the name of the Convention?a)Vienna Convention on Consular Relationsb)Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Genevac)Geneva Convention on the Law of Treatiesd)New York Convention on Consular RelationsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the Convention on the basis of which India filed its claims before the International Court of Justice has been replaced with [3]. What is the name of the Convention?a)Vienna Convention on Consular Relationsb)Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Genevac)Geneva Convention on the Law of Treatiesd)New York Convention on Consular RelationsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the Convention on the basis of which India filed its claims before the International Court of Justice has been replaced with [3]. What is the name of the Convention?a)Vienna Convention on Consular Relationsb)Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Genevac)Geneva Convention on the Law of Treatiesd)New York Convention on Consular RelationsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the Convention on the basis of which India filed its claims before the International Court of Justice has been replaced with [3]. What is the name of the Convention?a)Vienna Convention on Consular Relationsb)Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Genevac)Geneva Convention on the Law of Treatiesd)New York Convention on Consular RelationsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the Convention on the basis of which India filed its claims before the International Court of Justice has been replaced with [3]. What is the name of the Convention?a)Vienna Convention on Consular Relationsb)Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Genevac)Geneva Convention on the Law of Treatiesd)New York Convention on Consular RelationsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the Convention on the basis of which India filed its claims before the International Court of Justice has been replaced with [3]. What is the name of the Convention?a)Vienna Convention on Consular Relationsb)Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Genevac)Geneva Convention on the Law of Treatiesd)New York Convention on Consular RelationsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the Convention on the basis of which India filed its claims before the International Court of Justice has been replaced with [3]. What is the name of the Convention?a)Vienna Convention on Consular Relationsb)Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Genevac)Geneva Convention on the Law of Treatiesd)New York Convention on Consular RelationsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Passage - 5The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has ordered Pakistan to allow India consular access to Mr. [1], an Indian citizen convicted of espionage in Pakistan. The judgment, delivered by ICJ President [2], to a packed court at The Hague, however, rejected Indias demand that [1]s conviction by a military court be dismissed. The court also extended a stay on the execution of [1] pending aPakistani legal review and reconsideration of the conviction based on the ICJs ruling that [1]s rights to consular access were violated. Pakistan contended that [1] did not have a right to consular access because he had been convicted of espionage and "terrorism", but the court ruled that Article 36 of the [3] Convention on consular relations was applicable."The Court therefore concludes that Pakistan has breached the obligations incumbent on it under Article 36 of the [3] Convention, by denying consular officers of India access to [1], contrary to their right to visit him, to converse and correspond with him, and to arrange for his legal representation," said [2]. The convention was applicable "regardless of the allegations that [1] was engaged in espionage activities".Mr. [1], a former Indian navy officer, was arrested by Pakistani authorities in the southwestern province of [4] in March 2016 and charged with espionage. Following a trial behind closed doors by a Pakistani military tribunal, [1 ] was convicted of espionage, sabotage and terrorism, and sentenced to death in April 2017.Q.In the given passage, the name of the Convention on the basis of which India filed its claims before the International Court of Justice has been replaced with [3]. What is the name of the Convention?a)Vienna Convention on Consular Relationsb)Convention relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Genevac)Geneva Convention on the Law of Treatiesd)New York Convention on Consular RelationsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.