Answer:

Introduction:
The given statement states that the speaker does not oppose the prince or the king but rather the wicked ministers who oppress the people. Let's analyze the options and identify who could have possibly made this statement.

Options:
a) Kunal
b) Dasaratha
c) Bindusara
d) Jaluka

Analysis of Options:
a) Kunal:
- Kunal is the son of Emperor Ashoka and Queen Devi.
- Kunal is known for his moral values and righteous conduct.
- Kunal is portrayed as a compassionate and just ruler.
- He is unlikely to oppose the prince or the king unless they are engaging in oppressive behavior.
- Therefore, it is possible that Kunal made this statement.

b) Dasaratha:
- Dasaratha is the father of Lord Rama and the king of Ayodhya in the Hindu epic "Ramayana."
- Dasaratha is known for his wisdom and just rule.
- There is no specific instance in the epic where Dasaratha opposes the prince or the king.
- Therefore, it is unlikely that Dasaratha made this statement.

c) Bindusara:
- Bindusara is the son of Emperor Chandragupta Maurya and the father of Emperor Ashoka.
- There is no significant information available about Bindusara's reign or his stance on oppression.
- Therefore, it is unclear whether Bindusara made this statement.

d) Jaluka:
- Jaluka is not a well-known historical or mythological figure.
- There is no information available about Jaluka's background or his stance on oppressive ministers.
- Therefore, it is unlikely that Jaluka made this statement.

Conclusion:
Out of the given options, Kunal stands out as the most likely candidate who made the statement. Kunal's reputation for righteousness and justice aligns with the sentiment expressed in the statement. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' - Kunal.