Consider the following statements about Charvaka School. 1. Brihaspat...
Charvaka School
The Charvaka School, also known as Lokayata, was an ancient Indian philosophical school that originated around the 6th century BCE. It was known for its materialistic and atheistic views and was critical of religious beliefs and practices. Let's analyze the given statements about the Charvaka School:
Statement 1: Brihaspati laid the foundation stone of this school.
This statement is incorrect. Although the Charvaka School has been attributed to a sage named Brihaspati, there is no historical evidence to support this claim. Brihaspati is a mythical figure associated with being the guru of gods, and it is likely that his name was attached to the school later on. Therefore, statement 1 is not correct.
Statement 2: It was the main propounder of the materialistic view to achieve salvation.
This statement is also incorrect. The Charvaka School rejected the idea of salvation altogether. It believed in the here and now, emphasizing the pursuit of pleasure and enjoyment in the present life. According to the Charvakas, there was no life after death, and one should focus on maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain in this life. Therefore, statement 2 is not correct.
Conclusion:
Based on the analysis above, we can conclude that neither of the given statements about the Charvaka School is correct. The school did not have a specific founder like Brihaspati, and it did not advocate for materialistic views to achieve salvation. Instead, it promoted a hedonistic philosophy that prioritized pleasure and enjoyment in the present life without concern for religious or spiritual matters.
Consider the following statements about Charvaka School. 1. Brihaspat...
Brihaspati laid the foundation stone of this school and it was supposed to be one of the earliest schools that developed a philosophical theory. The philosophy is old enough to find mention in the Vedas and Brihadarankya Upanishad. The Charvaka School was the main propounder of the materialistic view to achieve salvation. As it was geared towards the common people, the philosophy was soon dubbed as Lokayata or something derived from the common people. The word 'Lokayata' also meant a keen attachment to the physical and material world (loka). They argued for a complete disregard of any world beyond this world that was inhabited by a person. They denied the existence of any supernatural or divine agent who could regulate our conduct on earth. They argued against the need to achieve salvation and also denied the existence of brahma and God. They believed in anything that could be touched and be experienced by the human senses.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.