Explanation:

The Revolt of 1857, also known as the First War of Indian Independence, was a significant event in India's history. It marked the beginning of the end of British rule in India and paved the way for the Indian freedom struggle. However, not all historians and scholars regard it as the First Indian War of Independence. Among them is R.C. Mazumdar.

Who is R.C. Mazumdar?
- R.C. Mazumdar was an Indian historian and scholar.
- He was born in 1885 in West Bengal and died in 1952.
- He is known for his writings on Indian history, particularly the medieval period.
- He was a professor of history at Calcutta University and later at Patna University.

Why R.C. Mazumdar does not regard the Revolt of 1857 as the First Indian War of Independence?
- R.C. Mazumdar believed that the Revolt of 1857 was not a war of independence because it did not have a national character.
- According to him, the Revolt was a series of local rebellions that were not coordinated and did not have a common goal.
- He argued that the leaders of the Revolt, such as Nana Saheb and Rani Lakshmibai, were fighting for their own rights and not for the independence of India as a whole.
- He also pointed out that the Revolt did not receive widespread support from the Indian people, and many Indians continued to support the British rule.

Other Scholars who regard the Revolt of 1857 as the First Indian War of Independence:
- V.D. Savarkar, a prominent Indian freedom fighter and nationalist, regarded the Revolt of 1857 as the First War of Indian Independence.
- Nandlal Chaterjee, an Indian historian, also regarded the Revolt of 1857 as the First War of Indian Independence.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, while the Revolt of 1857 is widely regarded as the First Indian War of Independence, not all scholars and historians share this view. R.C. Mazumdar, in particular, believed that the Revolt was not a war of independence because it lacked a national character and did not have a common goal.