Which of the following features can not be associated with the agraria...
Explanation:
The agrarian structure of the post-Gupta period refers to the organization and functioning of the agricultural system during this time. It involved various features and changes that impacted the lives of the peasantry and the overall economy.
Sub-infeudation and sub-leasing of land:
- The post-Gupta period witnessed the practice of sub-infeudation and sub-leasing of land.
- Under this system, the land was divided into smaller units and given to individuals who would then further lease or sub-lease it to others.
- This led to the fragmentation of land and the emergence of a complex network of landowners, tenants, and sub-tenants.
Increase in tenancy rights of the peasantry:
- During this period, there was an increase in the rights of the peasantry, especially the tenants.
- They were granted more security of tenure and were allowed to transfer their rights to others.
- This provided some level of stability and security to the peasantry.
Imposition of forced labour:
- Forced labor was an important feature of the agrarian structure during the post-Gupta period.
- The ruling elites, including the state and the temple authorities, often imposed forced labor on the peasantry.
- The peasantry was required to work on public works projects, maintain irrigation systems, and contribute labor to the temple.
Temple also collected additional dues:
- The temple played a significant role in the agrarian structure of the post-Gupta period.
- Apart from collecting religious offerings, the temple also collected additional dues from the peasantry.
- These dues included taxes, fees, and various forms of contributions.
Increase in the mobility of artisans and peasants:
- This feature is not associated with the agrarian structure of the post-Gupta period.
- The period witnessed a decline in the mobility of artisans and peasants due to various factors such as the emergence of feudalism, the fragmentation of land, and the imposition of forced labor.
- The peasants were tied to the land and had limited opportunities for mobility.
Conclusion:
Thus, among the given options, the feature that cannot be associated with the agrarian structure of the post-Gupta period is the increase in the mobility of artisans and peasants.