Consider the following statements. 1. The 1935 Act was condemned by n...
- Nearly all sections condemned the 1935 Act and animously rejected by the Congress.
- However, the Hindu Mahasabha and the National Liberal Foundation declared themselves in favour of the working of the 1935 Act in the central and provincial level.
View all questions of this test
Consider the following statements. 1. The 1935 Act was condemned by n...
Background:
The 1935 Act was a significant legislative measure enacted by the British colonial government in India. It aimed to introduce limited self-government and political reforms in the country. However, it faced widespread criticism and opposition from various sections of Indian society.
Statement 1: The 1935 Act was condemned by nearly all sections and unanimously rejected by the Congress.
Explanation:
- The Indian National Congress, which was at the forefront of the freedom struggle, played a crucial role in opposing the 1935 Act.
- The Congress criticized the Act for not meeting the aspirations of the Indian people and for maintaining significant control in the hands of the British government.
- The Congress Working Committee, in its resolution dated 14th July 1935, condemned the Act as "a charter of slavery" and unanimously rejected it.
- The rejection by the Congress was significant as it represented the voice of a large section of the Indian population and played a vital role in mobilizing public opinion against the Act.
Statement 2: The Hindu Mahasabha and the National Liberal Foundation declared themselves against the working of the 1935 Act at the central as well as the provincial level.
Explanation:
- The Hindu Mahasabha and the National Liberal Foundation were two prominent political organizations during the pre-independence era in India.
- Both organizations were critical of the 1935 Act and expressed their opposition to its working.
- The Hindu Mahasabha, which primarily represented Hindu nationalist interests, believed that the Act did not adequately address the concerns and aspirations of the Hindu community.
- The National Liberal Foundation, a political party founded by C. Rajagopalachari, also criticized the Act for not providing sufficient autonomy to the Indian provinces.
- However, it is important to note that while these organizations opposed the working of the Act, their opposition was not as widespread or influential as that of the Indian National Congress.
Conclusion:
Based on the above explanation, it is evident that both statements are correct. The 1935 Act faced condemnation from various sections of Indian society, including the Indian National Congress, the Hindu Mahasabha, and the National Liberal Foundation. However, the Congress's rejection of the Act was more significant in terms of its impact and influence. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A' - 1 Only.