Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Which official has the right to take part in ...

Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?

a)
Election commissioner
b)
Vice president
c)
CAG
d)
Attorney general of India

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

The government and the Opposition are headed on a collision course in the Budget session of Parliament, with the latter planning to move a joint motion demanding a repeal of the three laws that are agitating farmers in much of the country. The confrontation over these laws is a legacy of the last session when they were passed without detailed and proper consultation with political parties, experts and farmer representatives. The session began with around 20 Opposition parties boycotting the President’s address to a joint sitting of Parliament. BSP President Mayawati belatedly announced her party’s decision to also stay away as a mark of protest. The delay clearly outlined her intention to keep a distance from the Opposition bloc, which among others has the Congress and the Samajwadi Party. The boycott indicated a worsening of the relationship between the government and the Opposition. In January 2020, the Opposition had attended the President’s address wearing black bands. The last time the Opposition boycotted the President’s Address was in November 2019 to commemorate the Constitution Day. President Ram Nath Kovind said the government would keep the farm Bills on hold as per a Supreme Court directive but did not indicate any rethink.The government has advantages over the Opposition, in terms of the numerical strength in both Houses of Parliament. With the Tamil Nadu and West Bengal Assembly elections round the corner, two key Opposition parties, the DMK and the Trinamool Congress, are expected to be largely absent, further reducing the Opposition’s strength. The Opposition, despite its united front on the first day of the session, has a record of disintegrating in the face of the BJP’s manoeuvring in previous sessions. There will be discussion on the Motion of Thanks to the President and later on the Budget. As of now there are no indications of the Opposition skipping these events. In legislative business, recent ordinances such as the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, which has provisions to deal with domestic and international arbitration and defines the law for conducting conciliation proceedings, and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, which is for merging the J&K cadre of All India Services Officers such as the IAS, IPS and the Indian Forest Service with the Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Mizoram Union Territory (AGMUT) cadre, will have to get a parliamentary nod. The government draws its legitimacy from a parliamentary majority, but democratic conduct is more than enforcing the will of the majority. The government’s conduct in Parliament and outside, where its critics are facing the strong arm of the state machinery, should meet the high standards India has set for itself as a democracy.Q. Which of the following is not consistent with the passage?

View answer

The government and the Opposition are headed on a collision course in the Budget session of Parliament, with the latter planning to move a joint motion demanding a repeal of the three laws that are agitating farmers in much of the country. The confrontation over these laws is a legacy of the last session when they were passed without detailed and proper consultation with political parties, experts and farmer representatives. The session began with around 20 Opposition parties boycotting the President’s address to a joint sitting of Parliament. BSP President Mayawati belatedly announced her party’s decision to also stay away as a mark of protest. The delay clearly outlined her intention to keep a distance from the Opposition bloc, which among others has the Congress and the Samajwadi Party. The boycott indicated a worsening of the relationship between the government and the Opposition. In January 2020, the Opposition had attended the President’s address wearing black bands. The last time the Opposition boycotted the President’s Address was in November 2019 to commemorate the Constitution Day. President Ram Nath Kovind said the government would keep the farm Bills on hold as per a Supreme Court directive but did not indicate any rethink.The government has advantages over the Opposition, in terms of the numerical strength in both Houses of Parliament. With the Tamil Nadu and West Bengal Assembly elections round the corner, two key Opposition parties, the DMK and the Trinamool Congress, are expected to be largely absent, further reducing the Opposition’s strength. The Opposition, despite its united front on the first day of the session, has a record of disintegrating in the face of the BJP’s manoeuvring in previous sessions. There will be discussion on the Motion of Thanks to the President and later on the Budget. As of now there are no indications of the Opposition skipping these events. In legislative business, recent ordinances such as the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, which has provisions to deal with domestic and international arbitration and defines the law for conducting conciliation proceedings, and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Amendment) Ordinance, 2021, which is for merging the J&K cadre of All India Services Officers such as the IAS, IPS and the Indian Forest Service with the Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Mizoram Union Territory (AGMUT) cadre, will have to get a parliamentary nod. The government draws its legitimacy from a parliamentary majority, but democratic conduct is more than enforcing the will of the majority. The government’s conduct in Parliament and outside, where its critics are facing the strong arm of the state machinery, should meet the high standards India has set for itself as a democracy.Q. Which of the following would the author agree to?

View answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will require the President of India to follow the advice of a Committee. This Committee is composed of__

View answer

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Indicating the need for a rethink, the Supreme Court has asked Parliament to reconsider if the Speaker should continue to decide disqualification petitions of legislators under the anti-defection law (which provides disqualification of members from the Parliament and Assembly in case of defection or giving up one's commitment to a party and moving from one party to the other). The court asked for an independent mechanism to decide such cases, besides fixing a time limit of three months. The fractured nature of mandates has given rise to coalition politics, where disagreements arise between alliance partners. The quest for power along with money and muscle makes governments an unseemly spectacle, jeopardising political stability. That political stability is paramount has never been in doubt, more so when it is cobbled on the basis of shared beliefs. While the issue concerns their jurisdiction, charges of misuse of authority have always put presiding officers under a cloud.Earlier, too, it was suggested that the President or the Governor should decide on the advice of the Election Commission. It should be ensured that the assignment does not become another sinecure for the judiciary. The court interprets and upholds the Constitution while the legislature enacts laws. The decision of the Speaker on disqualification is already subject to judicial review. While the SC does ask for introspection, the legislature should not abdicate its responsibility. Parliament represents the people and it should have a self-correcting mechanism. What better affirmation of it than the Preamble getting recited at agitations. Presiding officers should conform to the highest standards of conduct.Q. Which of the following is not true as per the passage?

View answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.A Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court has ruled that the appointment of Election Commissioners will be carried out by the President of India based on the recommendations of a Committee. This procedure will be enforced until the Parliament enacts a law governing this matter, as stated by Justice KM Joseph while reading out the judgment.The bench observed that various political parties have come to power, yet none of them has established a legal framework or process for appointing Election Commissioners. It deemed this as a "gap" in the law and stressed the urgent need to create legislation under Article [1] of the Constitution.The bench emphasized that the Election Commission is obligated to operate impartially and in accordance with the Constitution and court directives. It asserted that the Election Commission must maintain its independence from any form of influence by the executive branch.The court also highlighted the importance of all stakeholders working together to preserve the integrity of the electoral process, ensuring that it accurately represents the will of the people. However, it expressed concern about the continuous misuse of the electoral process over time and made comments about the impartiality of the media in the current era, stating that "a significant portion of the media has abandoned its role and taken sides."[Adapted from: "Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Election Commissioners on Advice of Committee Comprising Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and CJI," Live Law]Q.Which article in the Indian Constitution grants the President the authority to request the Supreme Courts opinion on matters of significant public interest or specific laws deemed necessary for the Constitutions functionality?

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which official has the right to take part in the proceedings of the parliament without being a member?a)Election commissionerb)Vice presidentc)CAGd)Attorney general of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam