Question Description
Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared
according to
the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam.
Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.