CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agree... Start Learning for Free
Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.
Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?
  • a)
    Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.
  • b)
    Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.
  • c)
    The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.
  • d)
    The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties ...
In the present case, the contract between Rahul and Parul was never formed as Parul never conveyed her acceptance to the contract to Rahul. Thus, she would not get any legal damages for the violation of the contract. The Legal Principle is that the acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract. Hence, option B is correct.
Free Test
Community Answer
Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties ...

Explanation:

Unqualified acceptance required for a valid contract:
- In order for a contract to be valid, the acceptance of an agreement by both parties must be absolute and unqualified.
- In this case, Parul did not convey her acceptance to Rahul's proposal to sell two quintals of kerosene at a certain price. She only mentioned that she would think about it, which indicates a lack of unqualified acceptance.

Consequences of lack of unqualified acceptance:
- Since Parul did not provide an absolute and unqualified acceptance to Rahul's proposal, a valid contract was not formed between them.
- As a result, Parul would not be entitled to any damages from Rahul for the alleged dishonoring of the contract, as there was no binding contract in the first place.

Legal implications:
- It is important for parties entering into an agreement to ensure that their acceptance is clear, unambiguous, and unqualified to avoid any misunderstandings or disputes in the future.
- In this case, the lack of unqualified acceptance by Parul renders the agreement between her and Rahul invalid, and therefore she would not have any legal basis to claim damages from Rahul.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Question Description
Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Legal Principle : The acceptance of an agreement by both the parties must be absolute and unqualified in order to constitute a valid contract.Facts of the Problem : Rahul proposes to sell Parul two quintals of kerosene at the cost of Rs. 40/litre. Parul did not convey her acceptance, but says that she would think about it. Unable to wait for Parul to accept the contract, Rahul sells the kerosene to someone else. Parul gets furious after learning about the sale of the kerosene to someone else by Rahul. Parul files a suit for damages against Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract?a)Parul would get damages from Rahul for the dishonouring of the contract.b)Parul would not get any relief as the acceptance of Parul to the contract was not absolute.c)The contract between Rahul and Parul was against public policy as kerosene could not be sold/purchased in the open market.d)The court would direct Rahul to sell the specified quantity of kerosene to Parul.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev