How is the word ‘Swadeshi’ different from ‘boycott’ as far as the Ind...
- The people had adopted the twin programme of ‘boycott’ and ‘Swadeshi’ as parts of the same movement. These two words are two sides of the same coin, and both were used as economic and political tools.
- Boycott referred to the boycott of British goods to register the British public protest against the grave injustice inflicted on Bengal.
- The boycott was a seemingly negative programme and Swadeshi as its positive corollary was accepted. Swadeshi meant the use of and encouragement to native products as against foreign goods. Thus, the boycott and Swadeshi movements brought all classes of Indian society, particularly in Bengal, to a common platform for a national cause.
View all questions of this test
How is the word ‘Swadeshi’ different from ‘boycott’ as far as the Ind...
Explanation:
Swadeshi and boycott were two important movements during the Indian freedom struggle. The word ‘Swadeshi’ is different from ‘boycott’ in the following ways:
1. Swadeshi was essentially an economic movement; a boycott was not: Swadeshi was a movement that encouraged Indians to use indigenous goods and boycott foreign goods. It was an economic movement that aimed at promoting Indian industries and creating employment opportunities for Indians. On the other hand, boycott was a political movement that aimed at protesting against colonial policies by refusing to use British goods and services.
2. While Swadeshi attracted the lower strata of Indian society; boycott attracted the higher strata: Swadeshi was primarily a movement of the lower strata of Indian society, including peasants and workers. It encouraged them to use indigenous goods and boycott foreign goods. On the other hand, boycott was primarily a movement of the higher strata of Indian society, including the educated middle class. They boycotted British goods and services as a political protest against colonial policies.
Therefore, the correct answer is option D, i.e., none of the above.
How is the word ‘Swadeshi’ different from ‘boycott’ as far as the Ind...
The Difference between Swadeshi and Boycott in the Indian Freedom Struggle
Swadeshi and boycott were two important movements that played a significant role in the Indian freedom struggle against British colonialism. Although both movements aimed at weakening the economic and political power of the British colonial rulers, they were different in many respects. Let's understand the difference between Swadeshi and boycott as far as the Indian freedom struggle is concerned.
Swadeshi Movement
Swadeshi was an economic movement that aimed at promoting the use of indigenous goods and services and boycotting foreign goods and services. It was launched in 1905, in response to the partition of Bengal by Lord Curzon. Swadeshi was essentially a movement of the masses, particularly the lower strata of Indian society, who were suffering from poverty, unemployment, and exploitation under the British rule. The Swadeshi movement encouraged people to use Indian products and services, such as handloom clothes, khadi, and swadeshi soap, and to boycott foreign goods, particularly British goods, such as textiles, salt, sugar, and liquor. The Swadeshi movement was not only an economic movement but also a political movement that aimed at arousing national consciousness and promoting self-reliance and self-respect among Indians.
Boycott Movement
Boycott was a political movement that aimed at boycotting British institutions and officials in India. It was launched in 1907, as a part of the Swadeshi movement, by the Indian National Congress. The boycott movement aimed at boycotting British-made goods, British-run educational institutions, and British officials. The boycott movement was essentially a movement of the educated and middle-class Indians who were inspired by the ideas of nationalism, democracy, and freedom. The boycott movement was not only a political movement but also a social movement that aimed at promoting Indian culture, values, and traditions.
Difference between Swadeshi and Boycott
Swadeshi and boycott were different in many respects, such as:
- Swadeshi was an economic movement; boycott was a political movement.
- Swadeshi aimed at promoting indigenous goods and services; boycott aimed at boycotting British institutions and officials.
- Swadeshi attracted the lower strata of Indian society; boycott attracted the educated and middle-class Indians.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Swadeshi and boycott were different movements that aimed at weakening the economic and political power of the British colonial rulers. While Swadeshi aimed at promoting indigenous goods and services and boycotting foreign goods and services, boycott aimed at boycotting British institutions and officials. Swadeshi attracted the lower strata of Indian society, while boycott attracted the educated and middle-class Indians.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.