CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Legal Principle : A contract which is made t... Start Learning for Free
Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.
Facts of the Problem : Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?
  • a)
    The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.
  • b)
    The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.
  • c)
    The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.
  • d)
    The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practise trade or profession without any legal restrictions.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal pro...
Explanation:

Void Contract:
- A contract that is made to restrain legal proceedings is considered void under the law.
- Such contracts are against public policy as they restrict individuals from seeking legal remedies.

Analysis of the Situation:
- In the given scenario, Raj and Nitin entered into a contract where Nitin agreed not to represent Jatin in any lawsuit for a year.
- However, Raj later represented Jatin in a civil suit, breaching the terms of the contract.

Legal Outcome:
- The suit filed by Nitin against Raj for breach of contract would likely fail.
- Since the contract was made to restrict legal proceedings, it is considered void and unenforceable.
- Raj, being a barrister, also has the fundamental right to practice his profession without any legal restrictions.

Therefore, the legal outcome of the suit against Raj would be that the suit would fail as the contract made to restrain legal proceedings is void under the law.
Free Test
Community Answer
Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal pro...
In the instant case, the contract between Raj and Nitin was made which tried to restrain the legal proceedings. As any contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law; thus, the contract between Raj and Nitin is also void and the action of Nitin suing Raj for the violation of the void contract would fail.
Hence, option C is correct.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Question Description
Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.Facts of the Problem : Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?a)The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.b)The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.c)The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.d)The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practise trade or profession without any legal restrictions.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.Facts of the Problem : Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?a)The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.b)The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.c)The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.d)The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practise trade or profession without any legal restrictions.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.Facts of the Problem : Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?a)The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.b)The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.c)The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.d)The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practise trade or profession without any legal restrictions.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.Facts of the Problem : Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?a)The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.b)The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.c)The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.d)The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practise trade or profession without any legal restrictions.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.Facts of the Problem : Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?a)The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.b)The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.c)The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.d)The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practise trade or profession without any legal restrictions.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.Facts of the Problem : Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?a)The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.b)The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.c)The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.d)The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practise trade or profession without any legal restrictions.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.Facts of the Problem : Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?a)The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.b)The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.c)The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.d)The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practise trade or profession without any legal restrictions.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.Facts of the Problem : Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?a)The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.b)The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.c)The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.d)The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practise trade or profession without any legal restrictions.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Legal Principle : A contract which is made to restraint the legal proceedings is void under the law.Facts of the Problem : Raj is a leading barrister of the city. His friend Nitin enters into a contract with him that he would not represent Jatin in any lawsuit for the next one year. After two months, Raj represents Jatin in a civil suit. Nitin sues Raj for the breach of the contract. What would be the legal outcome of the suit against Raj?a)The suit would grant relief to Nitin as Raj has violated the terms of the contract.b)The suit would award compensation to Nitin and would direct Raj to pay the amount.c)The suit would fail as the contract being made to restraint the legal proceedings is void.d)The suit would fail as Raj is a barrister and he has the fundamental right to practise trade or profession without any legal restrictions.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev