Consider the following statement in the context of Blue Rebellion:1. L...
All are correct. In many villages, headmen who had been forced to sign indigo contracts mobilised the indigo peasants and fought pitched battles with the lathiyals. In other places, even the zamindars went around villages urging the ryots to resist the planters. These zamindars were unhappy with the increasing power of the planters and angry at being forced by the planters to give them land on long leases.
View all questions of this test
Consider the following statement in the context of Blue Rebellion:1. L...
Introduction:
The Blue Rebellion, also known as the Indigo Revolt, was a significant peasant uprising in Bengal, India, during the late 1850s. The rebellion was primarily aimed at resisting the exploitative practices of indigo planters and the British colonial administration. In this context, let us analyze the given statements.
Statement 1: Local zamindars supported the ryots in rebellion.
The zamindars were the landlords who held significant power and authority over the rural areas. They collected revenue from the peasants and had strong socio-economic influence in their respective regions. During the Blue Rebellion, the zamindars did play a role in supporting the ryots (peasants) in their rebellion against the indigo planters and the British administration. The zamindars, being part of the local power structure, were well aware of the exploitative practices of the planters and the grievances of the ryots. They saw an opportunity to assert their own authority and gain the support of the ryots by backing the rebellion. Therefore, statement 1 is correct.
Statement 2: Zamindars were annoyed with the increasing power of the planters.
The indigo planters, who were mostly British, held considerable power and control over the indigo trade. They had the support of the British administration and were known for their oppressive and exploitative practices towards the ryots. The zamindars, on the other hand, felt threatened by the increasing power and influence of the planters. The growing dominance of the planters not only affected the socio-economic balance but also challenged the authority of the zamindars in their own territories. Therefore, statement 2 is also correct.
Conclusion:
Both statement 1 and statement 2 are correct. The local zamindars did support the ryots in their rebellion against the planters, and they were indeed annoyed by the increasing power of the planters. These factors played a significant role in the Blue Rebellion, which ultimately led to the resistance and eventual decline of the exploitative indigo system in Bengal.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.