Question Description
Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two conclusions. Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the statement?Statement:If there are good reasons for pronouncing that the pre-historic carvings cannot be accurate copies from nature, and of a lower artistic standard than has been supposed, it will need to be determined how far their unlikeness to the animals they have been supposed to represent can be attributed to shortcomings naturally pertaining to pre-historic art.Conclusions: (A) The carvings are as close imitations as can be expected from sculptors not possessed of adequate skills.(B) The carvings form an unsafe basis for deductions of assumed accurate imitation.a)If conclusion (A) alone can be drawn from the statementb)If conclusion (B) alone can be drawn from the statementc)If both (A) and (B) can be drawn from the statementd)If neither (A) nor (B) can be drawn from the statementCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two conclusions. Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the statement?Statement:If there are good reasons for pronouncing that the pre-historic carvings cannot be accurate copies from nature, and of a lower artistic standard than has been supposed, it will need to be determined how far their unlikeness to the animals they have been supposed to represent can be attributed to shortcomings naturally pertaining to pre-historic art.Conclusions: (A) The carvings are as close imitations as can be expected from sculptors not possessed of adequate skills.(B) The carvings form an unsafe basis for deductions of assumed accurate imitation.a)If conclusion (A) alone can be drawn from the statementb)If conclusion (B) alone can be drawn from the statementc)If both (A) and (B) can be drawn from the statementd)If neither (A) nor (B) can be drawn from the statementCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two conclusions. Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the statement?Statement:If there are good reasons for pronouncing that the pre-historic carvings cannot be accurate copies from nature, and of a lower artistic standard than has been supposed, it will need to be determined how far their unlikeness to the animals they have been supposed to represent can be attributed to shortcomings naturally pertaining to pre-historic art.Conclusions: (A) The carvings are as close imitations as can be expected from sculptors not possessed of adequate skills.(B) The carvings form an unsafe basis for deductions of assumed accurate imitation.a)If conclusion (A) alone can be drawn from the statementb)If conclusion (B) alone can be drawn from the statementc)If both (A) and (B) can be drawn from the statementd)If neither (A) nor (B) can be drawn from the statementCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two conclusions. Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the statement?Statement:If there are good reasons for pronouncing that the pre-historic carvings cannot be accurate copies from nature, and of a lower artistic standard than has been supposed, it will need to be determined how far their unlikeness to the animals they have been supposed to represent can be attributed to shortcomings naturally pertaining to pre-historic art.Conclusions: (A) The carvings are as close imitations as can be expected from sculptors not possessed of adequate skills.(B) The carvings form an unsafe basis for deductions of assumed accurate imitation.a)If conclusion (A) alone can be drawn from the statementb)If conclusion (B) alone can be drawn from the statementc)If both (A) and (B) can be drawn from the statementd)If neither (A) nor (B) can be drawn from the statementCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two conclusions. Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the statement?Statement:If there are good reasons for pronouncing that the pre-historic carvings cannot be accurate copies from nature, and of a lower artistic standard than has been supposed, it will need to be determined how far their unlikeness to the animals they have been supposed to represent can be attributed to shortcomings naturally pertaining to pre-historic art.Conclusions: (A) The carvings are as close imitations as can be expected from sculptors not possessed of adequate skills.(B) The carvings form an unsafe basis for deductions of assumed accurate imitation.a)If conclusion (A) alone can be drawn from the statementb)If conclusion (B) alone can be drawn from the statementc)If both (A) and (B) can be drawn from the statementd)If neither (A) nor (B) can be drawn from the statementCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two conclusions. Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the statement?Statement:If there are good reasons for pronouncing that the pre-historic carvings cannot be accurate copies from nature, and of a lower artistic standard than has been supposed, it will need to be determined how far their unlikeness to the animals they have been supposed to represent can be attributed to shortcomings naturally pertaining to pre-historic art.Conclusions: (A) The carvings are as close imitations as can be expected from sculptors not possessed of adequate skills.(B) The carvings form an unsafe basis for deductions of assumed accurate imitation.a)If conclusion (A) alone can be drawn from the statementb)If conclusion (B) alone can be drawn from the statementc)If both (A) and (B) can be drawn from the statementd)If neither (A) nor (B) can be drawn from the statementCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two conclusions. Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the statement?Statement:If there are good reasons for pronouncing that the pre-historic carvings cannot be accurate copies from nature, and of a lower artistic standard than has been supposed, it will need to be determined how far their unlikeness to the animals they have been supposed to represent can be attributed to shortcomings naturally pertaining to pre-historic art.Conclusions: (A) The carvings are as close imitations as can be expected from sculptors not possessed of adequate skills.(B) The carvings form an unsafe basis for deductions of assumed accurate imitation.a)If conclusion (A) alone can be drawn from the statementb)If conclusion (B) alone can be drawn from the statementc)If both (A) and (B) can be drawn from the statementd)If neither (A) nor (B) can be drawn from the statementCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two conclusions. Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the statement?Statement:If there are good reasons for pronouncing that the pre-historic carvings cannot be accurate copies from nature, and of a lower artistic standard than has been supposed, it will need to be determined how far their unlikeness to the animals they have been supposed to represent can be attributed to shortcomings naturally pertaining to pre-historic art.Conclusions: (A) The carvings are as close imitations as can be expected from sculptors not possessed of adequate skills.(B) The carvings form an unsafe basis for deductions of assumed accurate imitation.a)If conclusion (A) alone can be drawn from the statementb)If conclusion (B) alone can be drawn from the statementc)If both (A) and (B) can be drawn from the statementd)If neither (A) nor (B) can be drawn from the statementCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In the following question, a statement is followed by two conclusions. Which of the following conclusions can be logically drawn from the statement?Statement:If there are good reasons for pronouncing that the pre-historic carvings cannot be accurate copies from nature, and of a lower artistic standard than has been supposed, it will need to be determined how far their unlikeness to the animals they have been supposed to represent can be attributed to shortcomings naturally pertaining to pre-historic art.Conclusions: (A) The carvings are as close imitations as can be expected from sculptors not possessed of adequate skills.(B) The carvings form an unsafe basis for deductions of assumed accurate imitation.a)If conclusion (A) alone can be drawn from the statementb)If conclusion (B) alone can be drawn from the statementc)If both (A) and (B) can be drawn from the statementd)If neither (A) nor (B) can be drawn from the statementCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.