Introduction:
In a democracy, the assertion power should not reside with one person or a group located at one place. It is essential to disperse the power among different individuals or groups to ensure the smooth functioning of the democratic system. By distributing the assertion power, decision-making becomes more inclusive and representative, and the enforcement of decisions becomes more effective.

1. Inclusivity and Representation:
When the assertion power is dispersed among different individuals or groups, it allows for a more inclusive decision-making process. In a diverse society, decisions made by a single person or a group located at one place may not adequately represent the needs and aspirations of all citizens. By involving multiple stakeholders in the decision-making process, a wider range of perspectives can be considered, leading to more informed and comprehensive decisions.

2. Checks and Balances:
Dispersing the assertion power prevents the concentration of power in the hands of a few individuals or groups. This helps to establish a system of checks and balances, which is crucial for the protection of individual rights and the prevention of authoritarianism. When power is distributed, different individuals or groups can act as a counterbalance to each other, ensuring that no single entity becomes too dominant or oppressive.

3. Faster Decision-making:
Contrary to the assertion in the prompt, dispersing the assertion power does not necessarily hinder decision-making and enforcement. In fact, it can expedite the process. When power is concentrated in one person or group, decision-making can become slow and bureaucratic. On the other hand, when power is dispersed, decision-making can be decentralized, allowing for quicker responses to emerging challenges and opportunities.

4. Accountability:
Dispersing the assertion power enhances accountability within a democracy. When power is concentrated, it becomes easier for individuals or groups to evade responsibility for their actions. However, when power is dispersed, it becomes more difficult to hide behind a collective decision. Each individual or group involved in the decision-making process becomes accountable for their choices, promoting transparency and ensuring that decisions are made in the best interest of the people.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, it is vital for the assertion power to be dispersed among different individuals or groups in a democracy. This promotes inclusivity, representation, checks and balances, faster decision-making, and accountability. By avoiding the concentration of power in the hands of a few, a democratic system can function more effectively and serve the interests of its citizens in a fair and equitable manner.

2