Which of the following statements regarding the land revenue system u...
- Under the Dahsala or Zabti System, there was no ten years settlement on the crops.
- In fact the settlement was based on the average prices and produces during the last ten years.
- 1/3rd share of the average crop production was apportioned to the state.
- This system was basically in practice during Shershah Suri but was honed perfectly during Akbar’s reign.
Kankut- This system was already in use in the fourteenth century. Under this method, instead of actually dividing the grain (kan), an estimate was made on the basis of an actual inspection on the spot. One-third of the estimated produce was fixed as the state demand.
Nasaq-This was widely prevalent in the Mughal Empire, particularly in Bengal. In this system a rough calculation was made on the basis of the past revenue receipts of the peasants. It required no actual measurement, but the area was ascertained from the records.
The most common and perhaps, the oldest were called batai or ghalla-bakhshi. In this system.
Hence, the correct option is (d).
View all questions of this test
Which of the following statements regarding the land revenue system u...
Land revenue system under Mughal Administration:
The Mughal Empire, which ruled over a large part of the Indian subcontinent from the 16th to the 18th century, implemented various land revenue systems to collect taxes from the agricultural sector. These systems aimed to ensure a steady income for the state while also providing stability and incentives for the peasants.
a) Zabti System: The settlement was based on the average prices and produces during the last 10 years.
- The Zabti system, also known as the fixed-demand system, was introduced by Emperor Akbar. It involved fixing the revenue demand for each plot of land based on the average produce and prices of the last 10 years. This system aimed to provide stability and predictability in revenue collection.
b) Ghalla-Bakshi System: The produce was divided between the state and the peasants in a fixed proportion.
- The Ghalla-Bakshi system, also known as the crop-sharing system, involved the division of the agricultural produce between the state and the peasants in a fixed proportion. The state's share, known as the ghalla, was determined based on the quality of the land, while the remaining share belonged to the peasants.
c) Nasaq System: It was a rough assessment of the amount payable by the peasant based on what he had been paying in the past.
- The Nasaq system involved a rough assessment of the amount payable by the peasant based on what he had been paying in the past. This system aimed to maintain continuity in revenue collection and prevent sudden fluctuations in the tax burden on the peasants.
d) Kankut System: It was a revenue system based on the measurement and assessment of the land and produce.
- This statement is incorrect. The Kankut system was not a revenue system used under Mughal administration. It is not associated with the land revenue system.
In conclusion, the correct answer is option 'D' as the Kankut system is not a part of the land revenue system under Mughal Administration. The other three options, Zabti system, Ghalla-Bakshi system, and Nasaq system, were all important revenue systems implemented during the Mughal period to collect taxes from the agricultural sector.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.