In which order did the following come to India?I. Thomas RoeII. Fa-hienIII. Hiuen-Tsanga)I, II, IIIb)II, I, IIIc)II, III, Id)III, I, IICorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > In which order did the following come to Indi...

In which order did the following come to India?

I. Thomas Roe

II. Fa-hien

III. Hiuen-Tsang

a)
I, II, III
b)
II, I, III
c)
II, III, I
d)
III, I, II

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

In which order did the following come to India?I. Thomas RoeII. Fa-hie...

Fa-hien visited during the reign of Chandragupta II. Hiuen Tsang was a Chinese traveller who visited India during King Hrashavardhana's reign. Sir Thomas Roe visited India during the reign of Jahangir. Hence, option C is correct.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the passage and answer the question that follows.Intellectual property law protects use of ideas and information that are of commercial value and prevents others, to the exclusion of the owner of the property, to commercially exploit the material without the owner's consent. With the rapid growth of industrialisation and international trade, protection of this intellectual property and vis-à-vis to have sufficient safeguards, in the form of Rules or Statutes, has gained immense importance. India can boast of a sound legal regime to deal with the intellectual property protection. The considerable number of statutes that India has, to deal with intellectual property issues, is itself an indication of her concerned attitude towards protection of intellectual property issues. The various Indian Acts are : Copyright Act, 1957, Trade Marks Act, 1999; Patents Act, 1970 [as amended by Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005], Designs Act, 2000; The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999; The Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Layout Design Act, 2000 and last but not the least, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers' Rights Act, 2001. Apart from laying down what are the rights available to the intellectual property owner, these Acts also contain a sound mechanism to prevent infringement of IPR. The remedies available for the protection of IPR are broadly classified into civil and criminal remedies. The orders in the line with Anton Piller's orders are made under the head of civil remedies. In India, Ordinance 39 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, authorises the court to issue orders in line with Anton Piller's order. Not only CPC, even the statutes like Trademarks Act, 1999, The Geographical Indications of Goods (Registration and Protection) Act, 1999 specifically provide for such an order. However, there have not been many case-laws debating over the aspects of Anton Piller's order. One of the earliest cases that dealt with the concept of Anton Piller's order, though cursorily was National Garments vs. National Apparels. Though it was not a case under Anton Piller under the interlocutory injunction, for restraining the defendant from doing business under the trade name which is in dispute, the court cited with approval from Kerly's treatise that 'in extremely urgent cases an ex-parte injunction may be obtained before full hearing of the motion or an Anton Piller order, for inspection of the defendant's premises without prior warning and discovery of his records, may be obtained. The Court also observed that Anton Piller's order is similar to the ex parte interlocutory order to take an inventory of the articles etc. passed in an ordinary suit.Q. Match the following and choose the correct option.

View answer

Principle:I. Under contract law, in order to convert a proposal into a promise, the acceptance must be absolute and unqualified.II. Any departure from the terms of the offer or any qualification vitiates the acceptance unless it is agreed to by the person from whom the offer comes. In other words, an acceptance with a variation is no acceptance, and it is simply a counter-proposal.III. A counter-offer puts an end to the original offer, and it cannot be revived by subsequent acceptance. Gareth refuses to lower the price of the shoes. Thomas finally consents to buy the shoes at the originally set price of $100.

View answer

Read the passage and answer the following question.The key reason for the disagreement between India and China was that contrary to Indias perception of matters, the Chinese saw themselves as leaders of the new world order. They therefore expected— indeed demanded—the prestige, respect and servitude that went along with it.When China overran Tibet, partly as a way of securing its western flank, India did not react. Instead, elephant-like Delhi sat and waited patiently for the aggression to abate.It did not. Instead, it grew in intensity.During the 1950s, Chinese premier Zhou Enlai had been on two goodwill visits to India. But Zhou Enlais polite gestures at diplomatic meetings had not stopped him from laying claim to Indias vulnerable northern flanks outside of these discussions: Ladakh and territories in the NEFA, now known as Arunachal Pradesh. Moreover, China was eyeing Barahoti in Uttar Pradesh, just south of Tibet. Indian troops were based there, and when Chinese soldiers tried to cross the southern border into India, the elephant finally protested. But the dragon did not blink.In the late 1950s, China denounced the McMahon Line, challenging its international validity. At the end of that year, Zhou Enlai visited Nehru in India with soothing words, assuring him that the border issue with Tibet would be resolved peacefully. In that same meeting, China also recognized the Indian boundary with Burma.By that time, Chinese soldiers were actually in Barahoti and had marched ten miles into Indian territory. The latter had taken too passive a role and now sat helpless as the dragon advanced, fired up. The following year, talks took place between the two countries. China was persuaded to withdraw its military but left its civilians in the territory.In January 1959, Zhou Enlai formally claimed Ladakh and NEFA for his country, giving orders for his command to be reflected in Chinese maps.Just four years earlier, India had formally handed over control of communication services in Tibet to China. When the Tibetan Buddhist leader, the Dalai Lama, asked Nehru for refuge in India because of increasing Chinese pressure on him and the Tibetan people, Nehru who was balanced precariously on a political tightrope, chose to side with Peking and refused the request.By March 1959, the eyes of the world were on the highly charged power plays. Following a crackdown on the Tibetan capital of Lhasa by the Peoples Liberation Army (PL

View answer

Read the passage and answer the following question.The key reason for the disagreement between India and China was that contrary to Indias perception of matters, the Chinese saw themselves as leaders of the new world order. They therefore expected— indeed demanded—the prestige, respect and servitude that went along with it.When China overran Tibet, partly as a way of securing its western flank, India did not react. Instead, elephant-like Delhi sat and waited patiently for the aggression to abate.It did not. Instead, it grew in intensity.During the 1950s, Chinese premier Zhou Enlai had been on two goodwill visits to India. But Zhou Enlais polite gestures at diplomatic meetings had not stopped him from laying claim to Indias vulnerable northern flanks outside of these discussions: Ladakh and territories in the NEFA, now known as Arunachal Pradesh. Moreover, China was eyeing Barahoti in Uttar Pradesh, just south of Tibet. Indian troops were based there, and when Chinese soldiers tried to cross the southern border into India, the elephant finally protested. But the dragon did not blink.In the late 1950s, China denounced the McMahon Line, challenging its international validity. At the end of that year, Zhou Enlai visited Nehru in India with soothing words, assuring him that the border issue with Tibet would be resolved peacefully. In that same meeting, China also recognized the Indian boundary with Burma.By that time, Chinese soldiers were actually in Barahoti and had marched ten miles into Indian territory. The latter had taken too passive a role and now sat helpless as the dragon advanced, fired up. The following year, talks took place between the two countries. China was persuaded to withdraw its military but left its civilians in the territory.In January 1959, Zhou Enlai formally claimed Ladakh and NEFA for his country, giving orders for his command to be reflected in Chinese maps.Just four years earlier, India had formally handed over control of communication services in Tibet to China. When the Tibetan Buddhist leader, the Dalai Lama, asked Nehru for refuge in India because of increasing Chinese pressure on him and the Tibetan people, Nehru who was balanced precariously on a political tightrope, chose to side with Peking and refused the request.By March 1959, the eyes of the world were on the highly charged power plays. Following a crackdown on the Tibetan capital of Lhasa by the Peoples Liberation Army (PL

View answer

Read the passage and answer the following question.The key reason for the disagreement between India and China was that contrary to Indias perception of matters, the Chinese saw themselves as leaders of the new world order. They therefore expected— indeed demanded—the prestige, respect and servitude that went along with it.When China overran Tibet, partly as a way of securing its western flank, India did not react. Instead, elephant-like Delhi sat and waited patiently for the aggression to abate.It did not. Instead, it grew in intensity.During the 1950s, Chinese premier Zhou Enlai had been on two goodwill visits to India. But Zhou Enlais polite gestures at diplomatic meetings had not stopped him from laying claim to Indias vulnerable northern flanks outside of these discussions: Ladakh and territories in the NEFA, now known as Arunachal Pradesh. Moreover, China was eyeing Barahoti in Uttar Pradesh, just south of Tibet. Indian troops were based there, and when Chinese soldiers tried to cross the southern border into India, the elephant finally protested. But the dragon did not blink.In the late 1950s, China denounced the McMahon Line, challenging its international validity. At the end of that year, Zhou Enlai visited Nehru in India with soothing words, assuring him that the border issue with Tibet would be resolved peacefully. In that same meeting, China also recognized the Indian boundary with Burma.By that time, Chinese soldiers were actually in Barahoti and had marched ten miles into Indian territory. The latter had taken too passive a role and now sat helpless as the dragon advanced, fired up. The following year, talks took place between the two countries. China was persuaded to withdraw its military but left its civilians in the territory.In January 1959, Zhou Enlai formally claimed Ladakh and NEFA for his country, giving orders for his command to be reflected in Chinese maps.Just four years earlier, India had formally handed over control of communication services in Tibet to China. When the Tibetan Buddhist leader, the Dalai Lama, asked Nehru for refuge in India because of increasing Chinese pressure on him and the Tibetan people, Nehru who was balanced precariously on a political tightrope, chose to side with Peking and refused the request.By March 1959, the eyes of the world were on the highly charged power plays. Following a crackdown on the Tibetan capital of Lhasa by the Peoples Liberation Army (PL

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Crash Course for CLAT

CLAT Mock Test Series 2026