Why does the story of the forests and people of Bastar not end with th...
The story of the forests and people of Bastar does not end with the rebellion of 1910 because both option (a) and (b) are true. Let's discuss each of these points in detail.
a) Practice of keeping people out of the forests and reserving them for industrial use continued even after Independence:
After the rebellion of 1910, the British government implemented policies to exclude local communities from accessing the forests in Bastar. The forests were considered as a valuable resource for commercial exploitation, and the government wanted to reserve them for industrial purposes. This practice of excluding people from the forests continued even after India gained independence. The Forest Department, which was established during the British rule, continued to wield significant control over the forests, and local communities were deprived of their traditional rights and access to forest resources.
b) The World Bank proposed that 4,600 hectares of national sal forest should be replaced by tropical pine for the paper industry. It was scrapped later:
In the 1980s, the World Bank proposed a project in Bastar that aimed to replace 4,600 hectares of national sal forest with tropical pine plantations for the paper industry. This proposal was met with strong opposition from environmental activists and local communities. The project would have resulted in the displacement of indigenous communities and the destruction of the natural ecosystem of Bastar. However, due to the resistance and protests against the project, it was eventually scrapped.
c) Both (a) and (b):
Considering the above points, option (c) is the correct answer. The story of the forests and people of Bastar does not end with the rebellion of 1910 because the practice of excluding people from the forests for industrial use continued even after Independence, and there have been instances like the World Bank proposal where attempts were made to exploit the forests for commercial gains. The struggle of the local communities and environmental activists to protect their rights and the forest ecosystem has been ongoing, making it clear that the story is not limited to a single event or period.
Why does the story of the forests and people of Bastar not end with th...
It is likely that the story of the forests and people of Bastar did not end with the rebellion of 1910 because of the continued practice of keeping people out of the forests and reserving them for industrial use, even after Independence. This is one possibility, but without more context it is difficult to be certain. Option (c) is correct in this case. It is worth noting that the World Bank did propose replacing 4,600 hectares of national sal forest with tropical pine for the paper industry, but this proposal was later scrapped.