Consider the following statements. 1. The constitution does not place...
< b="" />Explanation:< />
The question is asking us to identify the correct statement(s) regarding the power of superintendence over subordinate courts. Let's analyze each statement:
< b="" />Statement 1:< /> The constitution does not place any restriction on this power of superintendence over the subordinate courts.
This statement is correct. The power of superintendence over subordinate courts is vested in the High Courts under Article 227 of the Indian Constitution. The Constitution does not place any specific restrictions on this power, allowing the High Courts to exercise it within the bounds of justice and fairness.
< b="" />Statement 2:< /> It is not only through an appeal by the person, but it can also be suo motu.
This statement is correct. The power of superintendence can be exercised not only through appeals filed by individuals but also suo motu, which means on the court's own motion. This enables the High Courts to take cognizance of any matter that requires their attention and intervene in the interest of justice.
< b="" />Statement 3:< /> It is of the nature of revision as it verifies the earlier judgments.
This statement is correct. The power of superintendence includes the power of revision, which allows the High Courts to review and correct any errors or irregularities in the judgments of subordinate courts. By exercising this power, the High Courts can ensure that the subordinate courts have followed the correct legal procedures and have delivered justice in accordance with the law.
Therefore, all three statements are correct, and the correct answer is option 'D' - All of them.
Consider the following statements. 1. The constitution does not place...
The constitution does not place any restriction on this power of superintendence over the subordinate courts; it is not only through an appeal by the person, but it can also be a suo motto. It is of the nature of revision as it verifies the earlier judgments. In this regard, it is considered as a special function as the Supreme Court has no similar power vis a vis the High Court.