Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: In making decisions about import...

Join the Discussion on the App

The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.

Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?

Arguments:

I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.

II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.

a)
Only argument I is strong.
b)
Only argument II is strong.
c)
Either argument I or argument II is strong.
d)
Both arguments I and II are strong.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

AILET Mock Test-3 (New Pattern)

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desi...

Argument (I) is strong because such sweeping powers often tend to fall prey to vested interests. Argument (II) is strong as well because performance and efficiency are matters of concern.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments.`Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organisations and these organisations will become more profitable establishments as a result.

View answer

Passage:Management is a set of processesthat can keep a complicated system of people and technology running smoothly. The most important aspects of management include planning, budgeting, organizing, staffing, controlling, and problem-solving. Leadership is a set of processes that creates organisations in the first place or adapts them to significantly changing circumstances. Leadership defines what the future should look like, aligns people with that vision, and inspires them to make it happen despite the obstacles. This distinction is absolutely crucial for our purposes here: Successful transformation is 70 to 90 percent leadership and only 10 to 30 percent management. Yet for historical reasons, many organisations today don‘t have much leadership. And almost everyone thinks about the problems here as one of managing change. For most of this century, as we created thousands and thousands of large organizations for the first time in human history, we didn‘t have enough good managers to keep all those bureaucracies functioning. So many companies and universities developed management programs, and hundreds and thousands of people were encouraged to learn management on the job. And they did. But, people were taught little about leadership. To some degree, management was emphasized because it‘s easier to teach than leadership. But even more so, management was the main item on the twentieth-century agenda because that‘s what was needed. For every entrepreneur or business builder who was a leader, we needed hundreds of managers to run their ever growing enterprises. Unfortunately for us today, this emphasis on management has often been institutionalized in corporate cultures that discourage employees from learning how to lead. Ironically, past success is usually the key ingredient in producing this outcome.The syndrome, as I have observed it on many occasions, goes like this: success creates some degree of market dominance, which in turn produces much growth. After a while keeping the ever larger organizations under control becomes the primary challenge. So attention turns inward, and managerial competencies are nurtured. With a strong emphasis on management but not on leadership, bureaucracy and an inward focus take over. But with continued success, the result mostly of market dominance, the problem often goes unaddressed and an unhealthy arrogance begins to evolve. All of these characteristics then make any transformation effort much more difficult. Arrogant managers can over- evaluate their current performance and competitive position, listen poorly, and learn slowly. Inwardly focused employees can have difficulty seeing the very forces that present threats and opportunities.Bureaucratic cultures can smother those who want to respond to shifting conditions. And the lack of leadership leaves no fore inside these organizations to break out of the morass.Q.Management education was emphasized in the management programs because

View answer

Motivating employees with traditional authority and financial…(11)….has become increasingly…(12)… as employees become economically secure and their dependency on any one particular organisation…..(13)…. . According to expectancy theorists, the motivation to….(14)…increases when an employee feels his…(15)… is an instrument for obtaining desired rewards. Nevertheless, in many organisations today employees are….(16)… to organizational rewards just by being employed. Unions, governmental regulations, and the nature of the job itself in some cases…..(17)… management from …..(18)… financial rewards to performance. People may be attracted to join and remain in organisations to receive organizational rewards, but…(19)…motivated to join an organisation is…(20)..the same as being motivated to exert effort in an organisation.Q.Find the word most appropriate for Blank No. 20

View answer

Motivating employees with traditional authority and financial…(11)….has become increasingly…(12)… as employees become economically secure and their dependency on any one particular organisation…..(13)…. . According to expectancy theorists, the motivation to….(14)…increases when an employee feels his…(15)… is an instrument for obtaining desired rewards. Nevertheless, in many organisations today employees are….(16)… to organizational rewards just by being employed. Unions, governmental regulations, and the nature of the job itself in some cases…..(17)… management from …..(18)… financial rewards to performance. People may be attracted to join and remain in organisations to receive organizational rewards, but…(19)…motivated to join an organisation is…(20)..the same as being motivated to exert effort in an organisation.Q.Find the word most appropriate for Blank No. 19

View answer

Motivating employees with traditional authority and financial…(11)….has become increasingly…(12)… as employees become economically secure and their dependency on any one particular organisation…..(13)…. . According to expectancy theorists, the motivation to….(14)…increases when an employee feels his…(15)… is an instrument for obtaining desired rewards. Nevertheless, in many organisations today employees are….(16)… to organizational rewards just by being employed. Unions, governmental regulations, and the nature of the job itself in some cases…..(17)… management from …..(18)… financial rewards to performance. People may be attracted to join and remain in organisations to receive organizational rewards, but…(19)…motivated to join an organisation is…(20)..the same as being motivated to exert effort in an organisation.Q.Find the word most appropriate for Blank No. 11

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between `strong` arguments and `weak` arguments. `Strong` arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. `Weak` arguments are those which are of minor importance and they are directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the given arguments is a `strong` argument.Question: Should all the non-performing employees in the public sector be compulsorily retrenched from service?Arguments:I. No, this will give an unjust handle to the management and they may use it indiscriminately.II. Yes, this will help in increasing the efficiency of these organizations and these organizations will become more profitable establishments as a result.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either argument I or argument II is strong.d)Both arguments I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam