Which of the following statements is correct in the context of the pro...
- The presiding officer (Speaker or Chairman) declares the House adjourned sine die when the business of a session is completed. Within the next few days, the President issues a notification for the prorogation of the session. However, the President can also prorogue the House while in session.
- It not only terminates a sitting but also a session of the House.
- It does not affect the bills or any other business pending before the House. Under Article 107 (3) of the Constitution, a bill pending in Parliament shall not lapse by reason of the prorogation of the Houses.
- However, all pending notices (other than those for introducing bills) lapse on prorogation and fresh notices have to be given for the next session. In Britain, prorogation brings to an end all bills or any other business pending before the House.
- Hence option (b) is the correct answer.
View all questions of this test
Which of the following statements is correct in the context of the pro...
Explanation:
The correct statement in the context of the prorogation of the session of Parliament is option B: Prorogation does not affect the bills pending before the Lok Sabha.
Prorogation of the Session of Parliament:
Prorogation refers to the end of a session of Parliament. It is the formal process by which a session of the Parliament is brought to a close. During prorogation, all pending business, discussions, and bills are terminated, and any unfinished matters are dropped. However, prorogation does not affect bills pending before the Lok Sabha.
Explanation of the Statements:
a) The President of India can not prorogue the House while in session: This statement is incorrect. The President of India has the power to prorogue the House while in session. Prorogation is usually done on the advice of the Prime Minister.
b) Prorogation does not affect the bills pending before the Lok Sabha: This statement is correct. When a session of Parliament is prorogued, the bills pending before the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha do not lapse. They continue to be pending and can be taken up in the next session.
c) The pending notices (other than those for introducing bills) do not lapse on prorogation: This statement is incorrect. When a session is prorogued, all pending notices, including those for discussions and debates, lapse. They need to be reintroduced in the next session.
d) In general, the presiding officer of the House issues a notification for the prorogation: This statement is correct. The presiding officer, i.e., the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, issues a notification for the prorogation of the session.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, prorogation of the session of Parliament does not affect the bills pending before the Lok Sabha. They continue to be pending and can be taken up in the next session.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.