Khalisa lands werea)Barren landsb)Land belonging to enemy countryc)Ver...
1. During medieval times, lands were divided into Khalisa and jagir or iqta lands.
2. Revenue collected from Khalisa lands was directly deposited into the Central treasury (Delhi in case of Mughals or Delhi Sultanate). Revenue was collected by agents of Emperor / Sultan in these lands.
3. Responsibility of revenue collection in Jagir or Iqta lands was given to Jagirdar (Mughals) or Iqtedar (Sultanate) respectively. Only a part of revenue collection from these lands went to the central treasury, rest was used for administration of these Jagirs and Iqtas.
Khalisa lands werea)Barren landsb)Land belonging to enemy countryc)Ver...
The Khalisa Lands
The correct answer is option 'D', i.e., "Land under direct control of Crown." Khalisa lands refer to the lands that were directly owned and controlled by the Crown or the ruler of a kingdom. These lands were not given on lease or granted to anyone else but were kept under the direct authority and administration of the ruler. Let us understand this answer in detail.
1. Definition of Khalisa Lands
Khalisa lands were those lands that were not given on rent or leased out to anyone but were retained by the ruler for their personal use. These lands were directly under the control and ownership of the Crown.
2. Barren Lands
Barren lands, as mentioned in option 'A', refer to lands that are not suitable for cultivation or any other productive use. These lands may lack fertility, water resources, or other essential conditions required for agriculture or settlement. Khalisa lands were not barren lands as they were productive and actively utilized by the ruler.
3. Land Belonging to Enemy Country
Option 'B' states that Khalisa lands were lands belonging to an enemy country. However, this is an incorrect statement. Khalisa lands were not specifically lands seized from enemy countries but were the lands directly controlled by the ruler within their own kingdom or empire.
4. Very Productive Land
Option 'C' suggests that Khalisa lands were very productive lands. This statement is partially correct. While it is true that Khalisa lands were productive, it is not necessary that all Khalisa lands were exceptionally fertile or productive. Some Khalisa lands could be highly productive, while others may have had average or below-average productivity. The productivity of Khalisa lands varied depending on factors such as soil quality, irrigation facilities, and the efforts made by the ruler in agricultural development.
5. Land under Direct Control of Crown
Option 'D' correctly states that Khalisa lands were the lands under the direct control of the Crown or ruler. These lands were not granted to anyone else, and the ruler had complete authority over them. The revenue generated from these lands directly went into the treasury of the ruler, and they could use these lands for their personal needs or for the welfare of the kingdom.
In conclusion, Khalisa lands were the lands under the direct control of the Crown or ruler. These lands were not barren lands or lands seized from enemy countries, but rather productive lands that were utilized by the ruler for their personal use or the betterment of the kingdom.