All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in ... Start Learning for Free
Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.
No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.
Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.
It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.
Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.
Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.
Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.
  • a)
    Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.
  • b)
    Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.
  • c)
    Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.
  • d)
    Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India...
Correct Answer is (b)
Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated. They can get married elsewhere.
Incorrect Answers
None of the other options sets out views that are consistent with those of the author in the passage above.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. In case of irreconcilable conflict between Directiv e Principles of State Policy and Fundamental Rights, the latter shall prevail. Promotion of public health is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Hema is a rural women recently married. There is no LPG in their village and she cooks food on 'chullas' (brick-wood oven) which is the only way to cook food in her village.According to a study by World Health Organization, prolonged exposure to the smoke from chullas leads to lung cancer. The government of India banned all chullas. Hema seeks your advice.

Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. No person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of commission of the act charged as an offence, nor subjected to a penalty greater than that which might have been inflicted under the law in force at the time of the commission of the offence. This is the principle of non-retrospectivity in the infliction of punishment. The Joker is a notorious psychopathic criminal in Gotham city. There is no law in Gotham forbidding anyone from holding up two ferries and threatening to blow both of them unless one of them blows up the other one first. His attempt to turn the people on the ferries against one another fails, and he is tried in Court by Harvey Dent. Decide.

Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Right and Directive Principles of State Policy should be construed harmoniously. Right to life includes right to eat. Protection of cow is a DPSP.The government of Tamil Nadu passed a law by which all persons were obliged to bow to the cow. Many tribal people who were out of mainstream used to consume cow meat and refused to honour it citing their fundamental right to life. The government arrested all these tribals. The government's argument is that protection of cow is a directive principle of state policy. Decide.

Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The Constitutional right to free speech entails the right to express opinions without censorship or restraint. It is, however, subject to reasonable restrictions. V is a mysterious crusader in dictatorial England. One evening, he hijacks the communication lines and broadcasts a message saying "…there's something seriously wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have systems of surveillance…" He is caught and brought to trial, and sought to be executed for his words. Decide.

Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. The right to privacy refers to the idea that one's personal information is protected from public scrutiny.It applies to everyone who is considered a person under the Constitution, and can refer to a citizen as well as alien. Leo and Neo are a gay couple residing in India. They are Portuguese by birth, but have been living in India for a while. They have been exchanging emails and messages, which also contained nudes of the couple. Some homophobic miscreant hacker leaks their private messages and chats on Twitter.Leo and Neo go to Court saying that their fundamental right to privacy has been violated. Will they succeed?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.a)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.b)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.c)Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.d)Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.a)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.b)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.c)Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.d)Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.a)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.b)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.c)Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.d)Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.a)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.b)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.c)Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.d)Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.a)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.b)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.c)Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.d)Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.a)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.b)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.c)Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.d)Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.a)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.b)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.c)Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.d)Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.a)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.b)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.c)Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.d)Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.a)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.b)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.c)Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.d)Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Fundamental rights and DPSP as cherished in the Constitution of India together comprises the human rights of an individual. Fundamental rights are also known as inherent rights because they are inherent to every person by birth. These are the rights which provide an individual with some basic rights for the purpose of survival.No discrimination is made on the basis of religion, caste, race etc. and if any person feels so that his fundamental rights are being infringed then he can surely approach to court for the violation of his rights. The concept of DPSP emerged from Article 45 of the Irish Constitution. DPSP imposes a duty upon the state not only to protect and acknowledge the Fundamental right of the individual but also to achieve Social-economic goals. DPSPs are contained in Part IV of the Indian Constitution of India.Certain guidelines are present for the state authority to work upon them for the protection of society. It mostly focuses on welfare and improvement of society altogether. As fundamental rights are enforceable in a court of law, DPSP cannot be enforced for making any rules, policy or guidelines. Though the judiciary continued to hold that the Directives were subordinate to the Fundamental Rights, an attempt was made to achieve the ideals mentioned Directive Principles. The Supreme Court's view regarding the interplay of Directive principles and Fundamental Rights underwent a change. The courts came to realize that there should not be any conflicts between two sets of provisions of the Constitution which have a common origin and a common objective as would nullify either of them. The way out was found to lie in the doctrine of harmonious construction, arising out of the cannon of interpretation that parts of the same instrument must be read together in order to reconcile them with one another. Applying this doctrine, the Supreme Court came to adopt the view that in determining the ambit the ambit of Fundamental Rights themselves, the court might look at relevant Directive Principles.It can be concluded by saying that the basic feature of the constitution is to maintain harmony between fundamental rights and DPSP. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. The theme of fundamental rights must be made in light to DPSP.Q. Fundamental Rights are so quintessence that ev en Directive Principles of State Policy cannot abridge them. Right to marriage is a fundamental right.Protection of monument of natural importance is a Directive Principle of State Policy. Albert is in love with Monika. Both promise to get married. Albert's parents object as Monika is not of same religion.Albert decides to run away with Monika and settle elsewhere. They are of majority age. They organize their marriage ceremony in a monument which is of national significance. Just as Albert is about to take the last circle of 'saptapadi' the police stop him and arrest him. The reasons given is that their marriage ceremony is causing irreparable damage to the monument. Decide.a)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated.b)Albert and Monika's right to marriage is not getting violated.c)Though Albert and Monika's right to marriage is getting violated, it is only to protect the monument of national significance.d)Monika's and Albert's right to marriage will not prevail over protection of monument of national importance.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup