All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   In a democratic society, it is the state tha... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.
However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.
Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.
The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".
The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.
The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.
Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.
Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.
It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:
  • a)
    Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.
  • b)
    Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.
  • c)
    Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).
  • d)
    Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate respon...
Correct Answer is (d)
Central idea of the passage is that the NGO are an integral entity of a society. It is given that through the Act there is conferred huge power in the government. However the exercise of power by cancelling the licence is according to the mandate of FCRA. It is observed by the Apex Court that PETA is found to be involved in filing vexatious litigations which are against the public interest.
Therefore only sound choice is option d
Incorrect Answers
  • Choice (a) - This can be a preferred choice however the ground of anti-national activities not mentioned in the passage.
  • Choice (b) - Given option is consistent to the essence of the passage. However it does not answer the question with a satisfactory reason.
  • Choice (c) - Passage is silent on the same.
Attention CLAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (

In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (

In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (

In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (

Passage:Management is a set of processesthat can keep a complicated system of people and technology running smoothly. The most important aspects of management include planning, budgeting, organizing, staffing, controlling, and problem-solving. Leadership is a set of processes that creates organisations in the first place or adapts them to significantly changing circumstances. Leadership defines what the future should look like, aligns people with that vision, and inspires them to make it happen despite the obstacles. This distinction is absolutely crucial for our purposes here: Successful transformation is 70 to 90 percent leadership and only 10 to 30 percent management. Yet for historical reasons, many organisations today don‘t have much leadership. And almost everyone thinks about the problems here as one of managing change. For most of this century, as we created thousands and thousands of large organizations for the first time in human history, we didn‘t have enough good managers to keep all those bureaucracies functioning. So many companies and universities developed management programs, and hundreds and thousands of people were encouraged to learn management on the job. And they did. But, people were taught little about leadership. To some degree, management was emphasized because it‘s easier to teach than leadership. But even more so, management was the main item on the twentieth-century agenda because that‘s what was needed. For every entrepreneur or business builder who was a leader, we needed hundreds of managers to run their ever growing enterprises. Unfortunately for us today, this emphasis on management has often been institutionalized in corporate cultures that discourage employees from learning how to lead. Ironically, past success is usually the key ingredient in producing this outcome.The syndrome, as I have observed it on many occasions, goes like this: success creates some degree of market dominance, which in turn produces much growth. After a while keeping the ever larger organizations under control becomes the primary challenge. So attention turns inward, and managerial competencies are nurtured. With a strong emphasis on management but not on leadership, bureaucracy and an inward focus take over. But with continued success, the result mostly of market dominance, the problem often goes unaddressed and an unhealthy arrogance begins to evolve. All of these characteristics then make any transformation effort much more difficult. Arrogant managers can over- evaluate their current performance and competitive position, listen poorly, and learn slowly. Inwardly focused employees can have difficulty seeing the very forces that present threats and opportunities.Bureaucratic cultures can smother those who want to respond to shifting conditions. And the lack of leadership leaves no fore inside these organizations to break out of the morass.Q.Management education was emphasized in the management programs because

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup