Question Description
In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is filed seeking to ban the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in India. Since PETA is an FCRA-NGO, it is claimed that PETA is affecting the age-old customs of India.It was observed by the Apex Court that instead of adhering to its objectives, PETA had indulged in unnecessary activities like filing frivolous public interest litigation. The petitioner urges the Government to exercise the power to prohibit receipt of foreign contribution under certain situations. Based on the inference drawn, what should be the author's stand if the Government prohibits PETA to accept the funds:a)Prohibition will be supported because it is aimed at banning the NGOs which are involved in the Anti-National activities.b)Prohibition will not be supported because right to dissent is an integral part of the Right to free speech.c)Prohibition will be supported provided the government re-investigates the matter by a Special Investigation Team (SIT).d)Prohibition will not be supported because the NGO undermines the public interest.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.