Question Description
In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. The recognition of the rights of homosexuals and transgender people, for instance, would have been unimaginable without the sustained effort of civil society organisations. Due to conservative stance of the Government these NGOs are now under scanner. Not following the official lines, FCRA licenses of these NGOs were cancelled. If this is true, then, based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)Cancellation of licence is illegal because NGOs enjoys greater space than anyone else to voice their concerns.b)Cancellation of licence is perfectly valid as NGOs can only operate in the territory of Nation when they toe the line of Government.c)Cancellation is improper and illegal because NGOs voice cannot be muzzled. Right to criticize, dissent and disapprove is a legitimate part of the Right to speech.d)Cancellation is legitimate as these NGOs can have corrupting effect on the minds of youth, who are the future of our nation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. The recognition of the rights of homosexuals and transgender people, for instance, would have been unimaginable without the sustained effort of civil society organisations. Due to conservative stance of the Government these NGOs are now under scanner. Not following the official lines, FCRA licenses of these NGOs were cancelled. If this is true, then, based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)Cancellation of licence is illegal because NGOs enjoys greater space than anyone else to voice their concerns.b)Cancellation of licence is perfectly valid as NGOs can only operate in the territory of Nation when they toe the line of Government.c)Cancellation is improper and illegal because NGOs voice cannot be muzzled. Right to criticize, dissent and disapprove is a legitimate part of the Right to speech.d)Cancellation is legitimate as these NGOs can have corrupting effect on the minds of youth, who are the future of our nation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. The recognition of the rights of homosexuals and transgender people, for instance, would have been unimaginable without the sustained effort of civil society organisations. Due to conservative stance of the Government these NGOs are now under scanner. Not following the official lines, FCRA licenses of these NGOs were cancelled. If this is true, then, based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)Cancellation of licence is illegal because NGOs enjoys greater space than anyone else to voice their concerns.b)Cancellation of licence is perfectly valid as NGOs can only operate in the territory of Nation when they toe the line of Government.c)Cancellation is improper and illegal because NGOs voice cannot be muzzled. Right to criticize, dissent and disapprove is a legitimate part of the Right to speech.d)Cancellation is legitimate as these NGOs can have corrupting effect on the minds of youth, who are the future of our nation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. The recognition of the rights of homosexuals and transgender people, for instance, would have been unimaginable without the sustained effort of civil society organisations. Due to conservative stance of the Government these NGOs are now under scanner. Not following the official lines, FCRA licenses of these NGOs were cancelled. If this is true, then, based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)Cancellation of licence is illegal because NGOs enjoys greater space than anyone else to voice their concerns.b)Cancellation of licence is perfectly valid as NGOs can only operate in the territory of Nation when they toe the line of Government.c)Cancellation is improper and illegal because NGOs voice cannot be muzzled. Right to criticize, dissent and disapprove is a legitimate part of the Right to speech.d)Cancellation is legitimate as these NGOs can have corrupting effect on the minds of youth, who are the future of our nation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. The recognition of the rights of homosexuals and transgender people, for instance, would have been unimaginable without the sustained effort of civil society organisations. Due to conservative stance of the Government these NGOs are now under scanner. Not following the official lines, FCRA licenses of these NGOs were cancelled. If this is true, then, based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)Cancellation of licence is illegal because NGOs enjoys greater space than anyone else to voice their concerns.b)Cancellation of licence is perfectly valid as NGOs can only operate in the territory of Nation when they toe the line of Government.c)Cancellation is improper and illegal because NGOs voice cannot be muzzled. Right to criticize, dissent and disapprove is a legitimate part of the Right to speech.d)Cancellation is legitimate as these NGOs can have corrupting effect on the minds of youth, who are the future of our nation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. The recognition of the rights of homosexuals and transgender people, for instance, would have been unimaginable without the sustained effort of civil society organisations. Due to conservative stance of the Government these NGOs are now under scanner. Not following the official lines, FCRA licenses of these NGOs were cancelled. If this is true, then, based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)Cancellation of licence is illegal because NGOs enjoys greater space than anyone else to voice their concerns.b)Cancellation of licence is perfectly valid as NGOs can only operate in the territory of Nation when they toe the line of Government.c)Cancellation is improper and illegal because NGOs voice cannot be muzzled. Right to criticize, dissent and disapprove is a legitimate part of the Right to speech.d)Cancellation is legitimate as these NGOs can have corrupting effect on the minds of youth, who are the future of our nation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. The recognition of the rights of homosexuals and transgender people, for instance, would have been unimaginable without the sustained effort of civil society organisations. Due to conservative stance of the Government these NGOs are now under scanner. Not following the official lines, FCRA licenses of these NGOs were cancelled. If this is true, then, based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)Cancellation of licence is illegal because NGOs enjoys greater space than anyone else to voice their concerns.b)Cancellation of licence is perfectly valid as NGOs can only operate in the territory of Nation when they toe the line of Government.c)Cancellation is improper and illegal because NGOs voice cannot be muzzled. Right to criticize, dissent and disapprove is a legitimate part of the Right to speech.d)Cancellation is legitimate as these NGOs can have corrupting effect on the minds of youth, who are the future of our nation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. The recognition of the rights of homosexuals and transgender people, for instance, would have been unimaginable without the sustained effort of civil society organisations. Due to conservative stance of the Government these NGOs are now under scanner. Not following the official lines, FCRA licenses of these NGOs were cancelled. If this is true, then, based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)Cancellation of licence is illegal because NGOs enjoys greater space than anyone else to voice their concerns.b)Cancellation of licence is perfectly valid as NGOs can only operate in the territory of Nation when they toe the line of Government.c)Cancellation is improper and illegal because NGOs voice cannot be muzzled. Right to criticize, dissent and disapprove is a legitimate part of the Right to speech.d)Cancellation is legitimate as these NGOs can have corrupting effect on the minds of youth, who are the future of our nation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In a democratic society, it is the state that has the ultimate responsibility for ushering development to its citizens. In India, through the progressive interpretation of the Constitution and its laws and policies, the scope of development has been significantly broadened to include not just economic progress for citizens, but also promotion of social justice, gender equity, inclusion, citizen's awareness, empowerment and improved quality of life. To achieve this holistic vision of development, the state requires the constructive and collaborative engagement of the civil society in its various developmental activities and programs. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as the operational arm of the civil society therefore have an important role in the development processes.However, to the contrary, the Central Bureau of Investigation raided Amnesty International's offices in Bengaluru and Delhi based on allegations that the NGO had violated provisions of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010, and of the Indian Penal Code.Amnesty has been vocal about human rights abuses, notably in Jammu and Kashmir and Assam. This is worrying given that international funding is crucial for NGOs to function. The contribution of NGOs to human rights and public awareness is significant in India. Most NGOs are neither politically powerful nor have great financial capacity. Thus there is a power imbalance in this struggle, exacerbated by financial restraints on organisations.The FCRA regulates the receipt of funding from sources outside of India to NGOs working in India. It prohibits receipt of foreign contribution "for any activities detrimental to the national interest or public interest".The restrictions have serious consequences on both the rights to free speech and freedom of association under Articles 19(1) (a) and 19(1) (c) of the Constitution.The foreign funding prohibition also negates the significance of voluntary, non-profit associations in a democracy.Democracy requires critics and civil society. This is why invoking the FCRA to curb the work of NGOs is deeply troubling. In a democracy, criticism should be welcomed, not repressed. No government should ever be able to choose its own critics.Q. The recognition of the rights of homosexuals and transgender people, for instance, would have been unimaginable without the sustained effort of civil society organisations. Due to conservative stance of the Government these NGOs are now under scanner. Not following the official lines, FCRA licenses of these NGOs were cancelled. If this is true, then, based on the author's reasoning in the passage above:a)Cancellation of licence is illegal because NGOs enjoys greater space than anyone else to voice their concerns.b)Cancellation of licence is perfectly valid as NGOs can only operate in the territory of Nation when they toe the line of Government.c)Cancellation is improper and illegal because NGOs voice cannot be muzzled. Right to criticize, dissent and disapprove is a legitimate part of the Right to speech.d)Cancellation is legitimate as these NGOs can have corrupting effect on the minds of youth, who are the future of our nation.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.