UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Sched... Start Learning for Free
Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.
Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.
Codes: 
  • a)
    Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I. 
  • b)
    Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I. 
  • c)
    Statement I is true but Statement II is false. 
  • d)
    Statement I is false but Statement II is true.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exempti...
Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.

Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.

Explanation:
The Tenth Schedule of the Constitution of India, also known as the Anti-Defection Law, was inserted by the 52nd Amendment Act, 1985. It was introduced to curb the evil of political defections, which were seen as a threat to the political stability and integrity of the country.

Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of a split by one-third members of the legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.

This statement is true. The 91st Amendment Act, 2003 amended the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution and removed the provision that allowed exemption from disqualification in case of a split by one-third members of the legislature party. The amendment made it clear that a member of a House belonging to any political party would be disqualified if he voluntarily gives up his membership of that party.

Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended the omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.

This statement is also true. The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission all recommended the omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits. These recommendations were made to strengthen the Anti-Defection Law and prevent political defections for personal gains.

Conclusion:
Both statements I and II are individually true. Statement II provides the correct explanation for Statement I. The 91st Amendment Act deleted the provision of exemption from disqualification in case of a split by one-third members of the legislature party, and this deletion was recommended by the Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India, and the Constitutional Review Commission.
Free Test
Community Answer
Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exempti...
The Committee on Electoral Reforms (Dinesh Goswami Committee) in its report of 1990, the Law Commission of India in its 170th Report on “Reform of Electoral Laws” (1999) and the National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC) in its report of 2002 have, inter alia, recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.Codes:a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.Codes:a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.Codes:a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.Codes:a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.Codes:a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.Codes:a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.Codes:a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.Codes:a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.Codes:a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Statement I: The provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of split by one-third members of legislature party has been deleted by the 91st Amendment.Statement II: The Dinesh Goswami Committee, the Law Commission of India and the Constitutional Review Commission recommended omission of the provision of the Tenth Schedule pertaining to exemption from disqualification in case of splits.Codes:a)Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.b)Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.c)Statement I is true but Statement II is false.d)Statement I is false but Statement II is true.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev