Statement I: The Supreme Court hears only those who petition or appeal...
The Parliament has not made any provision for the use of Hindi in the Supreme Court. Hence, the Supreme Court hears only those who petition or appeal in English. In 1971, a petitioner insisted on arguing in Hindi a habeas corpus petition in the Supreme Court. But, the Court cancelled his petition on the ground that the language of the Court was English and allowing Hindi would be unconstitutional.
Statement I: The Supreme Court hears only those who petition or appeal...
Statement I: The Supreme Court hears only those who petition or appeal in English and not in Hindi.
Statement II: The Parliament has not made any provision for the use of Hindi in the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
Statement I: The Supreme Court hears only those who petition or appeal in English and not in Hindi.
This statement implies that the Supreme Court only accepts petitions or appeals that are filed in English and not in Hindi. It suggests that the court does not entertain cases filed in Hindi.
Statement II: The Parliament has not made any provision for the use of Hindi in the Supreme Court.
This statement indicates that the Parliament has not enacted any law or made any specific provision allowing the use of Hindi in the proceedings of the Supreme Court. It suggests that there is no legal requirement or obligation for the Supreme Court to conduct its proceedings in Hindi.
Explanation of the correct answer:
The correct answer is option A, which states that both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.
Explanation of why the correct answer is option A:
- The first statement states that the Supreme Court only hears cases filed in English. This is true because the Supreme Court conducts its proceedings primarily in English. The use of English as the official language of the court is based on historical reasons and the need for uniformity and consistency in legal proceedings.
- The second statement states that the Parliament has not made any provision for the use of Hindi in the Supreme Court. This is also true because there is no specific legislation or provision that mandates the use of Hindi in the Supreme Court. The court functions primarily in English, and there is no legal requirement for it to conduct proceedings in Hindi.
- Statement II provides the correct explanation for Statement I. The lack of provision for the use of Hindi in the Supreme Court, as stated in Statement II, is the reason why the court only hears cases filed in English, as stated in Statement I. Since there is no legal requirement for the court to conduct proceedings in Hindi, it only accepts cases filed in English.
In conclusion, both statements are individually true, and Statement II provides the correct explanation for Statement I. The Supreme Court primarily conducts its proceedings in English, and there is no legal obligation for it to hear cases filed in Hindi.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.