Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: In this question, principle is f...

Join the Discussion on the App

Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.

Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.

Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.

Q. Which of the following options is correct?

a)
He cannot be prosecuted
b)
He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.
c)
It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.
d)
It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

PU LLB Mock Test - 7 (New Pattern)

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Re...

The principle is enshrined in Article 20 of the Indian Constitution as the doctrine of Double Jeopardy. It means that no person should be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.

According to the given facts, Nimita though filed two complaints but they were filed with different forums, that is one under the department and the other under police station.

For the application of the doctrine of double jeopardy the person should have been prosecuted and punished by a criminal court. As Suresh was terminated by a departmental committee, he is not protected by the doctrine of double jeopardy and that his prosecution by the court is valid.

Answered by Glance Learning Institute · View profile

Attention CLAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CLAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CLAT.

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution defended that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?

View answer

Directions: This question consists of one or more principles followed by certain facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully and select the best option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once. This rule is known as double jeopardy.Facts: Nisha was a government employee. Embezzlement of funds was reported in her department. After the investigation, it came out that Nisha was responsible for this. So, she was handed over to the police for further criminal proceedings. She was convicted by the court and was given a punishment of 2 years of imprisonment. After this, a departmental inquiry was ordered to probe into the acts of Nisha by a government department. Nisha challenged this inquiry on the ground of above given principle.Decide

View answer

Directions: In this question, one or more principles are given followed by some facts. Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: Law of contract mandates that two or more people are free to create mutual rights and duties provided such rights and duties are not opposed to public policy.Facts: A enters into an agreement with B, under which B undertakes to kill A when he is asleep. For this act, A deposits Rs. 1 lakh in a bank, which B can withdraw once he has performed the aforesaid task. B kills A according to the terms of the agreement.

View answer

Paragraph:Notable for the reason that it is the rare tort where intention is of relevance; the tort of malicious prosecution takes place where a person motivated by malice or ill feeling brings about a false and frivolous case against another person in order to harass him by making him go through the rigours of litigation and court prosecution. There are certain ingredients of malicious prosecutionwhichare essential if a suit is to be maintained and for it to ultimately succeed. Malice and an intention to frame the person is essential. It could be any ill-feeling, vengeance, jealousy or intention to cause hardship or defamation, but the element ofintention is a must or even the intention of framing someone else to save oneself is enough intention.Where there is a genuine mistake, it will not be case of a malicious prosecution. In the case of Wyatt v White, the defendant discovered certain bags with the mark as his own and filed a charge of theft against the plaintiff in whose possession the bags were found. The plaintiff genuinely had a similar mark. The charge did not sustain, but the plaintiff sued the defendant for malicious prosecution. The court said itwas genuine mistake and as such the defendant was not motivated by malice, hence the suit did not succeed. However, a mere police complaint or institution of a case is not sufficient. It is important that the court process and prosecution must begin. In Ray v Bairagya, a criminal complaint was filed but was dismissed at inception. Since no proceeding had begun, the court did not recognise it to be a case of malicious prosecution.Q. Which of the following are not in consistency with the passage?

View answer

Principle: Malicious prosecution is the malicious institution of unsuccessful criminal or bankruptcy or liquidation proceedings against another without reasonable or probable cause. The main ingredients for action for malicious prosecution are: That he was prosecuted by the defendant. That the proceeding complained was terminated in favour of the present plaintiff That the prosecution was instituted against without any just or reasonable cause. That the prosecution was instituted with a malicious intention, that is, not with the mere intention of getting the law into effect, but with an intention, which was wrongful in fact. That he suffered damage to his reputation or to the safety of person, or to security of his property. Facts: Tenali used to work as a butler at Dharmodas’s house. Dharmodas’s relative Kaalia came to visit him for a few weeks. He never liked Tenali much. One day he lost his wallet in the market. Seeing an opportunity to trap Tenali, he went and complained to Dharmodas, saying that Tenali stole his wallet. Tenali was arrested on suspicion but was finally acquitted in the case. Dharmodas refused to employ Tenali again. Word about the case had spread, and no one was willing to employ Tenali due to the stigma of his having been arrested.

View answer

Top Courses for CLATView all

Legal Reasoning for CLAT

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

CLAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CLAT

Top Courses for CLAT

View all

Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2024 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: In this question, principle is followed by some facts. Read the principle carefully and apply it to the given facts and choose the correct option accordingly.Principle: No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offense more than once.Facts: Suresh harasses his colleague Nimita in the office. Nimita makes a complaint to her employer and also to the police station. Following the recommendations of the departmental committee, the employer terminates the services of Suresh. The police also arrested him and the prosecution argued that he cannot be punished twice.Q. Which of the following options is correct?a)He cannot be prosecutedb)He can be prosecuted because departmental proceedings are different from prosecution.c)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.d)It is the sole discretion of the court to prosecute him or not, as he has already paid a price by losing his job.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.

Explore Courses for CLAT exam