CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >   Directions: Read the following passage and a... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.
Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.
Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?
  • a)
    The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.
  • b)
    The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.
  • c)
    The author finds them directed at him alone.
  • d)
    The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given ...
The gap between what is said by the politicians and what they do makes the statements in the newspaper a daily anguish for the author.
Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given ...
Understanding the Author's Mortification
The author expresses a sense of frustration and disillusionment regarding the routine statements made by the government, which he encounters every morning in the newspapers. Here’s a detailed breakdown of the reasons behind his feelings:
Redundancy of Statements
- The author highlights that these government statements have become repetitive and lack originality. Phrases like “no one will be allowed to take law into his own hands” or “the corrupt will be dealt with firmly” have been heard numerous times, rendering them stale and meaningless.
- This sense of redundancy leads to a feeling of anguish for the author as he perceives these statements as empty promises that fail to convey any real commitment or action.
Illusions of Governance
- The passage suggests that these statements are a facade of governance. Despite being declared in bold print, they do not translate into meaningful actions or improvements in society. The author points out the disconnect between words and actions, indicating a lack of genuine governance.
Frustration with Media Representation
- The author feels that the newspapers perpetuate this cycle by prominently featuring these statements, thus participating in the dissemination of what he sees as hollow rhetoric. This contributes to his mortification as he confronts the same unproductive messages daily.
In conclusion, the author's mortification stems from the anguish of encountering repetitive and insincere statements that reflect non-governance. He yearns for meaningful dialogue and genuine actions rather than the hollow words that dominate the news. This aligns with option 'A', as it captures his frustration with the redundancy of what he reads in the newspapers.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. Why does the author say - 'These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance.'?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. The author feels the statement 'No one will be allowed to take the law into his own hands' is an empty statement devoid of any real meaning because

Top Courses for CLAT

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?a)The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.b)The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.c)The author finds them directed at him alone.d)The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?a)The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.b)The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.c)The author finds them directed at him alone.d)The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?a)The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.b)The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.c)The author finds them directed at him alone.d)The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?a)The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.b)The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.c)The author finds them directed at him alone.d)The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?a)The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.b)The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.c)The author finds them directed at him alone.d)The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?a)The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.b)The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.c)The author finds them directed at him alone.d)The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?a)The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.b)The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.c)The author finds them directed at him alone.d)The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?a)The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.b)The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.c)The author finds them directed at him alone.d)The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?a)The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.b)The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.c)The author finds them directed at him alone.d)The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. According to the passage, why is the author mortified by what he encounters every morning in bold prints?a)The author feels anguished by the redundancy of that he reads in the newspaper.b)The author finds the routine statements of authorities as being genuine.c)The author finds them directed at him alone.d)The author finds the newspapers insulting to the politicians.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev