Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. The author feels the statement 'No one will be allowed to take the law into his own hands' is an empty statement devoid of any real meaning becausea)laws are religiously followed in Indiab)he wants to break the lawc)law-breakers go scot-free and flourishd)laws are not implemented due to bureaucracyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. The author feels the statement 'No one will be allowed to take the law into his own hands' is an empty statement devoid of any real meaning becausea)laws are religiously followed in Indiab)he wants to break the lawc)law-breakers go scot-free and flourishd)laws are not implemented due to bureaucracyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. The author feels the statement 'No one will be allowed to take the law into his own hands' is an empty statement devoid of any real meaning becausea)laws are religiously followed in Indiab)he wants to break the lawc)law-breakers go scot-free and flourishd)laws are not implemented due to bureaucracyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. The author feels the statement 'No one will be allowed to take the law into his own hands' is an empty statement devoid of any real meaning becausea)laws are religiously followed in Indiab)he wants to break the lawc)law-breakers go scot-free and flourishd)laws are not implemented due to bureaucracyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. The author feels the statement 'No one will be allowed to take the law into his own hands' is an empty statement devoid of any real meaning becausea)laws are religiously followed in Indiab)he wants to break the lawc)law-breakers go scot-free and flourishd)laws are not implemented due to bureaucracyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. The author feels the statement 'No one will be allowed to take the law into his own hands' is an empty statement devoid of any real meaning becausea)laws are religiously followed in Indiab)he wants to break the lawc)law-breakers go scot-free and flourishd)laws are not implemented due to bureaucracyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. The author feels the statement 'No one will be allowed to take the law into his own hands' is an empty statement devoid of any real meaning becausea)laws are religiously followed in Indiab)he wants to break the lawc)law-breakers go scot-free and flourishd)laws are not implemented due to bureaucracyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. The author feels the statement 'No one will be allowed to take the law into his own hands' is an empty statement devoid of any real meaning becausea)laws are religiously followed in Indiab)he wants to break the lawc)law-breakers go scot-free and flourishd)laws are not implemented due to bureaucracyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question given after it.Some statements are routinely issued by the government of the day and they become news. They become news not necessarily because they are newsworthy, but because they are headlined by the newspapers. Let us examine some of these statements. No one will be allowed to take law into his own hands; the corrupt will be dealt with firmly; indiscipline will not be tolerated whether it is in a campus or in a political outfit; India will not compromise on its principles and so on and so forth. These have been spoken on innumerable occasions and have been heard on umpteen occasions and will continue to be spoken and heard. They have become so routinely stale that they have ceased to convey any meaning to anyone. These statements are necessary evils of non-governance or ill-governance. Yet they make news and we have the mortification of having to encounter them every morning in bold prints. What do they actually mean when they say that they will not allow anyone to take law into his own hands? Law, in its various forms, is not only taken into hands, but is also wantonly disregarded. This is not only tolerated, but is often given respectability too. If it were not so, we would not have been seeing the mushrooming of people with dubious character on the ascendancy right in our midst. Today, words speak, actions do not.Q. The author feels the statement 'No one will be allowed to take the law into his own hands' is an empty statement devoid of any real meaning becausea)laws are religiously followed in Indiab)he wants to break the lawc)law-breakers go scot-free and flourishd)laws are not implemented due to bureaucracyCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.