Difference in attitude towards Brahmanas:
- Tondaradippodi: Tondaradippodi was critical of the Brahmanas and their rituals. He believed that the Brahmanas were more focused on external rituals and did not have a true understanding of the divine. He saw the Brahmanas as being caught up in the external forms of worship and lacking in true devotion. Tondaradippodi believed that true devotion lies in the heart and not in external rituals. He emphasized the importance of a personal connection with God and rejected the idea that Brahmanas are the sole authority on religious matters.
- Appar: Appar, on the other hand, had a more positive attitude towards Brahmanas. He acknowledged their knowledge and expertise in ritual practices. Appar himself engaged in various rituals and sought the guidance of Brahmanas in performing them correctly. He believed that the Brahmanas played an important role in maintaining the social order and transmitting religious knowledge. Appar saw the Brahmanas as intermediaries between the divine and the people, and he respected their authority in matters of religion.

Similarities in attitude towards Brahmanas:
- Both Tondaradippodi and Appar believed in the importance of inner devotion and personal connection with the divine. They both rejected the idea that external rituals alone can lead to spiritual enlightenment.
- Both Tondaradippodi and Appar criticized the Brahmanas for their perceived lack of true understanding and devotion. They believed that the Brahmanas were too caught up in rituals and did not have a genuine connection with the divine.
- Both Tondaradippodi and Appar emphasized the need for direct experience of the divine. They believed that one should seek a personal relationship with God and not rely solely on the authority of the Brahmanas.

Overall:
While Tondaradippodi and Appar had different attitudes towards Brahmanas, they shared a common belief in the importance of inner devotion and personal connection with the divine. They both criticized the Brahmanas for their perceived lack of true understanding and devotion, and emphasized the need for direct experience of the divine. However, Appar had a more positive view of the Brahmanas and acknowledged their role in society and their expertise in rituals, while Tondaradippodi was more critical and rejected their authority in religious matters.