GMAT Exam > GMAT Questions > Authors writing detective stories frequently ...
Start Learning for Free
Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals' well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.
Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?
- a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.
- b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.
- c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.
- d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.
- e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Verified Answer
Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detec...
This question asks you to take the statements and draw a conclusion. One major trap in this type of question is an answer that is logical, but not supported by the statements in the stimulus.
A. The stimulus does not define what constitutes a well written story nor does it speak about what is a poorly written story. Consequently, it is difficult to make a statement like this that will logically follow from the stimulus.
B. Although this statement is probably true, it does not follow from the stimulus. Instead, the stimulus states that authors use an incompetent investigator to add complexity to the storyline (thereby making the reader's attempts to solve the case more challenging) not to show that investigations are complex.
C. While the stimulus states that stories "frequently" include an incompetent investigator who does not solve the case correctly, we cannot conclude an incompetent investigator "never" solves a case correctly.
D. This statement is quite similar to the final sentence of the stimulus and it logically follows from the stimulus. The statement that authors write in the way they do "to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation" provides the basis to conclude that authors write "to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult."
E. Although this statement is probably true, there is no evidence of it in the stimulus. Instead, the stimulus indicates that the complexity is added not for its resemblance to real life but for its ability to increase the challenge posed to readers seeking to solve the case correctly.
B. Although this statement is probably true, it does not follow from the stimulus. Instead, the stimulus states that authors use an incompetent investigator to add complexity to the storyline (thereby making the reader's attempts to solve the case more challenging) not to show that investigations are complex.
C. While the stimulus states that stories "frequently" include an incompetent investigator who does not solve the case correctly, we cannot conclude an incompetent investigator "never" solves a case correctly.
D. This statement is quite similar to the final sentence of the stimulus and it logically follows from the stimulus. The statement that authors write in the way they do "to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation" provides the basis to conclude that authors write "to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult."
E. Although this statement is probably true, there is no evidence of it in the stimulus. Instead, the stimulus indicates that the complexity is added not for its resemblance to real life but for its ability to increase the challenge posed to readers seeking to solve the case correctly.
Most Upvoted Answer
Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detec...
This question asks you to take the statements and draw a conclusion. One major trap in this type of question is an answer that is logical, but not supported by the statements in the stimulus.
A. The stimulus does not define what constitutes a well written story nor does it speak about what is a poorly written story. Consequently, it is difficult to make a statement like this that will logically follow from the stimulus.
B. Although this statement is probably true, it does not follow from the stimulus. Instead, the stimulus states that authors use an incompetent investigator to add complexity to the storyline (thereby making the reader's attempts to solve the case more challenging) not to show that investigations are complex.
C. While the stimulus states that stories "frequently" include an incompetent investigator who does not solve the case correctly, we cannot conclude an incompetent investigator "never" solves a case correctly.
D. This statement is quite similar to the final sentence of the stimulus and it logically follows from the stimulus. The statement that authors write in the way they do "to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation" provides the basis to conclude that authors write "to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult."
E. Although this statement is probably true, there is no evidence of it in the stimulus. Instead, the stimulus indicates that the complexity is added not for its resemblance to real life but for its ability to increase the challenge posed to readers seeking to solve the case correctly.
B. Although this statement is probably true, it does not follow from the stimulus. Instead, the stimulus states that authors use an incompetent investigator to add complexity to the storyline (thereby making the reader's attempts to solve the case more challenging) not to show that investigations are complex.
C. While the stimulus states that stories "frequently" include an incompetent investigator who does not solve the case correctly, we cannot conclude an incompetent investigator "never" solves a case correctly.
D. This statement is quite similar to the final sentence of the stimulus and it logically follows from the stimulus. The statement that authors write in the way they do "to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation" provides the basis to conclude that authors write "to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult."
E. Although this statement is probably true, there is no evidence of it in the stimulus. Instead, the stimulus indicates that the complexity is added not for its resemblance to real life but for its ability to increase the challenge posed to readers seeking to solve the case correctly.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Similar GMAT Doubts
Top Courses for GMATView all
Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Authors writing detective stories frequently include a brilliant detective and an incompetent investigator who embark on separate paths in an attempt to solve a crime. The separate accounts frequently consist of the incompetent investigator becoming distracted by the criminals well-planned attempts and the competent detective solving the case after a violent confrontation. Many literary analysts believe authors often choose this storyline in an attempt to provide readers additional complexity and challenge in solving the investigation.Q. Which of the following most logically follows from the statements above?a)A well-written detective story consists of an investigation being undertaken by a competent and incompetent investigator.b)Some authors use an incompetent investigator to show the complexities of an investigation.c)Authors never write stories with incompetent investigators who solve a case correctly.d)Authors can use the separate investigative accounts to make predicting the correct outcome of the investigation more difficult.e)Authors write stories with competent and incompetent investigators to show the complexity of real life.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for GMAT exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup