UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > In which case, Supreme Court held that Pream...
Start Learning for Free
In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?
- a)SR Bommai Case
- b)Kesavanand Bharti Case
- c)Ashok Kumar Thakur Case
- d)M C Mehta Case
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of t...
SR Bommai Case
The Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution in the case of SR Bommai. The case involved the dismissal of the state government of Karnataka in 1989 on grounds of political instability. The court was tasked with determining the validity of the President's proclamation under Article 356 of the Constitution.
Background
In 1989, the Janata Dal government in Karnataka was facing internal disputes and defections, leading to political instability. The Chief Minister, SR Bommai, was dismissed by the Governor, and President's Rule was imposed in the state. However, Bommai challenged the imposition of President's Rule in the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court's Ruling
The Supreme Court, in its landmark judgment, held that the power of the President to impose President's Rule under Article 356 is not absolute. The court emphasized the importance of federalism and held that the power must be exercised sparingly and in exceptional circumstances.
Relevance of the Preamble
In its judgment, the court referred to the Preamble as the key to understanding the Constitution. It stated that the Preamble indicates the basic features and fundamental values of the Constitution. The court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution and is subject to judicial review.
Secularism and Federalism
The court specifically highlighted the principles of secularism and federalism enshrined in the Preamble. It held that the dismissal of a state government based on political considerations would violate these principles. The court stated that secularism and federalism are part of the basic structure of the Constitution and cannot be tampered with.
Conclusion
The SR Bommai case reaffirmed the significance of the Preamble in interpreting the Constitution. It established that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution and can be used as a tool for determining the constitutionality of laws and actions. The case emphasized the principles of secularism and federalism as essential elements of the Indian democratic system.
The Supreme Court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution in the case of SR Bommai. The case involved the dismissal of the state government of Karnataka in 1989 on grounds of political instability. The court was tasked with determining the validity of the President's proclamation under Article 356 of the Constitution.
Background
In 1989, the Janata Dal government in Karnataka was facing internal disputes and defections, leading to political instability. The Chief Minister, SR Bommai, was dismissed by the Governor, and President's Rule was imposed in the state. However, Bommai challenged the imposition of President's Rule in the Supreme Court.
Supreme Court's Ruling
The Supreme Court, in its landmark judgment, held that the power of the President to impose President's Rule under Article 356 is not absolute. The court emphasized the importance of federalism and held that the power must be exercised sparingly and in exceptional circumstances.
Relevance of the Preamble
In its judgment, the court referred to the Preamble as the key to understanding the Constitution. It stated that the Preamble indicates the basic features and fundamental values of the Constitution. The court held that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution and is subject to judicial review.
Secularism and Federalism
The court specifically highlighted the principles of secularism and federalism enshrined in the Preamble. It held that the dismissal of a state government based on political considerations would violate these principles. The court stated that secularism and federalism are part of the basic structure of the Constitution and cannot be tampered with.
Conclusion
The SR Bommai case reaffirmed the significance of the Preamble in interpreting the Constitution. It established that the Preamble is an integral part of the Constitution and can be used as a tool for determining the constitutionality of laws and actions. The case emphasized the principles of secularism and federalism as essential elements of the Indian democratic system.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice In which case, Supreme Court held that Preamble is integral part of the constitution?a)SR Bommai Caseb)Kesavanand Bharti Casec)Ashok Kumar Thakur Cased)M C Mehta CaseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup