Question Description
It was held by the Supreme Court of India that Preamble was not a part of the Constitution in the case of ___________ and this has been overruled in the case of _________a)Berubari Union; Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Keralab)A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of Indiac)Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib; Som Prakash vs. Union of Indiad)Golaknath vs. State of Punjab; Shankari Prasad vs. Union of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about It was held by the Supreme Court of India that Preamble was not a part of the Constitution in the case of ___________ and this has been overruled in the case of _________a)Berubari Union; Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Keralab)A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of Indiac)Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib; Som Prakash vs. Union of Indiad)Golaknath vs. State of Punjab; Shankari Prasad vs. Union of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for It was held by the Supreme Court of India that Preamble was not a part of the Constitution in the case of ___________ and this has been overruled in the case of _________a)Berubari Union; Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Keralab)A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of Indiac)Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib; Som Prakash vs. Union of Indiad)Golaknath vs. State of Punjab; Shankari Prasad vs. Union of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for It was held by the Supreme Court of India that Preamble was not a part of the Constitution in the case of ___________ and this has been overruled in the case of _________a)Berubari Union; Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Keralab)A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of Indiac)Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib; Som Prakash vs. Union of Indiad)Golaknath vs. State of Punjab; Shankari Prasad vs. Union of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of It was held by the Supreme Court of India that Preamble was not a part of the Constitution in the case of ___________ and this has been overruled in the case of _________a)Berubari Union; Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Keralab)A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of Indiac)Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib; Som Prakash vs. Union of Indiad)Golaknath vs. State of Punjab; Shankari Prasad vs. Union of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of It was held by the Supreme Court of India that Preamble was not a part of the Constitution in the case of ___________ and this has been overruled in the case of _________a)Berubari Union; Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Keralab)A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of Indiac)Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib; Som Prakash vs. Union of Indiad)Golaknath vs. State of Punjab; Shankari Prasad vs. Union of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for It was held by the Supreme Court of India that Preamble was not a part of the Constitution in the case of ___________ and this has been overruled in the case of _________a)Berubari Union; Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Keralab)A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of Indiac)Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib; Som Prakash vs. Union of Indiad)Golaknath vs. State of Punjab; Shankari Prasad vs. Union of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of It was held by the Supreme Court of India that Preamble was not a part of the Constitution in the case of ___________ and this has been overruled in the case of _________a)Berubari Union; Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Keralab)A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of Indiac)Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib; Som Prakash vs. Union of Indiad)Golaknath vs. State of Punjab; Shankari Prasad vs. Union of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice It was held by the Supreme Court of India that Preamble was not a part of the Constitution in the case of ___________ and this has been overruled in the case of _________a)Berubari Union; Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Keralab)A. K. Gopalan vs. State of Madras; Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of Indiac)Ajay Hasia vs. Khalid Mujib; Som Prakash vs. Union of Indiad)Golaknath vs. State of Punjab; Shankari Prasad vs. Union of IndiaCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.