GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Abe and Beth both start from a common point a... Start Learning for Free
Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?
  • a)
    17%
  • b)
    20%
  • c)
    25%
  • d)
    40%
  • e)
    60%
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different di...
Let's assume that Beth's average speed is x miles per hour. Then Abe's average speed would be 25% greater, which is (1 + 0.25)x = 1.25x miles per hour.
Let's also assume that Beth needs to cover a distance of d miles. Then Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance, which is (1 + 0.5)d = 1.5d miles.
To find the travel time, we can use the formula:
Time = Distance / Speed
For Beth:
Beth's travel time = d / x
For Abe:
Abe's travel time = 1.5d / (1.25x)
Now, let's calculate the ratio of Beth's travel time to Abe's travel time:
(Beth's travel time) / (Abe's travel time) = (d / x) / (1.5d / (1.25x))
= (d / x) * (1.25x / (1.5d))
= (1.25 / 1.5)
= 0.8333
To express this ratio as a percentage, we multiply it by 100:
0.8333 * 100 = 83.33%
Rounded to the nearest option, the closest percentage is 80%.
Therefore, the correct answer is B: 20%.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result. But physicists John Sommerer and Edward Ott have conceived of a physical system in which even the least change in the starting conditions—no matter how small, inadvertent, or undetectable—can alter results radically. The system is represented by a computer model of a mathematical equation describing the motion of a particle placed in a particular type of force field.Sommerer and Ott based their system on an analogy with the phenomena known as riddled basins of attraction. If two bodies of water bound a large landmass and water is spilled somewhere on the land, the water will eventually make its way to one or the other body of water, its destination depending on such factors as where the water is spilled and the geographic features that shape the water’s path and velocity. The basin of attraction for a body of water is the area of land that, whenever water is spilled on it, always directs the spilled water to that body.In some geographical formations it is sometimes impossible to predict, not only the exact destination of the spilled water, but even which body of water it will end up in. This is because the boundary between one basin of attraction and another is riddled with fractal properties; in other words, the boundary is permeated by an extraordinarily high number of physical irregularities such as notches or zigzags. Along such a boundary, the only way to determine where spilled water will flow at any given point is actually to spill it and observe its motion; spilling the water at any immediately adjacent point could give the water an entirely different path, velocity, or destination.In the system posited by the two physicists, this boundary expands to include the whole system: i.e., the entire force field is riddled with fractal properties, and it is impossible to predict even the general destination of the particle given its starting point. Sommerer and Ott make a distinction between this type of uncertainty and that known as “chaos”; under chaos, a particle’s general destination would be predictable but its path and exact destination would not.There are presumably other such systems because the equation the physicists used to construct the computer model was literally the first one they attempted, and the likelihood that they chose the only equation that would lead to an unstable system is small. If other such systems do exist, metaphorical examples of riddled basins of attraction may abound in the failed attempts of scientists to replicate previous experimental results—in which case, scientists would be forced to question one of the basic principles that guide their work.According to the passage, Sommerer and Ott’s model differs from a riddled basin of attraction in which one of the following ways?

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result. But physicists John Sommerer and Edward Ott have conceived of a physical system in which even the least change in the starting conditions—no matter how small, inadvertent, or undetectable—can alter results radically. The system is represented by a computer model of a mathematical equation describing the motion of a particle placed in a particular type of force field.Sommerer and Ott based their system on an analogy with the phenomena known as riddled basins of attraction. If two bodies of water bound a large landmass and water is spilled somewhere on the land, the water will eventually make its way to one or the other body of water, its destination depending on such factors as where the water is spilled and the geographic features that shape the water’s path and velocity. The basin of attraction for a body of water is the area of land that, whenever water is spilled on it, always directs the spilled water to that body.In some geographical formations it is sometimes impossible to predict, not only the exact destination of the spilled water, but even which body of water it will end up in. This is because the boundary between one basin of attraction and another is riddled with fractal properties; in other words, the boundary is permeated by an extraordinarily high number of physical irregularities such as notches or zigzags. Along such a boundary, the only way to determine where spilled water will flow at any given point is actually to spill it and observe its motion; spilling the water at any immediately adjacent point could give the water an entirely different path, velocity, or destination.In the system posited by the two physicists, this boundary expands to include the whole system: i.e., the entire force field is riddled with fractal properties, and it is impossible to predict even the general destination of the particle given its starting point. Sommerer and Ott make a distinction between this type of uncertainty and that known as “chaos”; under chaos, a particle’s general destination would be predictable but its path and exact destination would not.There are presumably other such systems because the equation the physicists used to construct the computer model was literally the first one they attempted, and the likelihood that they chose the only equation that would lead to an unstable system is small. If other such systems do exist, metaphorical examples of riddled basins of attraction may abound in the failed attempts of scientists to replicate previous experimental results—in which case, scientists would be forced to question one of the basic principles that guide their work.The discussion of the chaos of physical systems is intended to perform which one of the following functions in the passage?

One of the foundations of scientific research is that an experimental result is credible only if it can be replicated—only if performing the experiment a second time leads to the same result. But physicists John Sommerer and Edward Ott have conceived of a physical system in which even the least change in the starting conditions—no matter how small, inadvertent, or undetectable—can alter results radically. The system is represented by a computer model of a mathematical equation describing the motion of a particle placed in a particular type of force field.Sommerer and Ott based their system on an analogy with the phenomena known as riddled basins of attraction. If two bodies of water bound a large landmass and water is spilled somewhere on the land, the water will eventually make its way to one or the other body of water, its destination depending on such factors as where the water is spilled and the geographic features that shape the water’s path and velocity. The basin of attraction for a body of water is the area of land that, whenever water is spilled on it, always directs the spilled water to that body.In some geographical formations it is sometimes impossible to predict, not only the exact destination of the spilled water, but even which body of water it will end up in. This is because the boundary between one basin of attraction and another is riddled with fractal properties; in other words, the boundary is permeated by an extraordinarily high number of physical irregularities such as notches or zigzags. Along such a boundary, the only way to determine where spilled water will flow at any given point is actually to spill it and observe its motion; spilling the water at any immediately adjacent point could give the water an entirely different path, velocity, or destination.In the system posited by the two physicists, this boundary expands to include the whole system: i.e., the entire force field is riddled with fractal properties, and it is impossible to predict even the general destination of the particle given its starting point. Sommerer and Ott make a distinction between this type of uncertainty and that known as “chaos”; under chaos, a particle’s general destination would be predictable but its path and exact destination would not.There are presumably other such systems because the equation the physicists used to construct the computer model was literally the first one they attempted, and the likelihood that they chose the only equation that would lead to an unstable system is small. If other such systems do exist, metaphorical examples of riddled basins of attraction may abound in the failed attempts of scientists to replicate previous experimental results—in which case, scientists would be forced to question one of the basic principles that guide their work.Given the information in the passage, Sommerer and Ott are most likely to agree with which one of the following?

Top Courses for GMAT

Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?a)17%b)20%c)25%d)40%e)60%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?a)17%b)20%c)25%d)40%e)60%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?a)17%b)20%c)25%d)40%e)60%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?a)17%b)20%c)25%d)40%e)60%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?a)17%b)20%c)25%d)40%e)60%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?a)17%b)20%c)25%d)40%e)60%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?a)17%b)20%c)25%d)40%e)60%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?a)17%b)20%c)25%d)40%e)60%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?a)17%b)20%c)25%d)40%e)60%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Abe and Beth both start from a common point and travel in different directions towards their respective destinations. Abe’s average speed is 25% greater than Beth’s average speed but Abe needs to cover 50% greater distance than Beth. Which of the following is closest to the percentage by which the travel time of Beth lesser than that of Abe?a)17%b)20%c)25%d)40%e)60%Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev