All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants h... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.
The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses because
  • a)
    it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric power
  • b)
    it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safely
  • c)
    it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing waste
  • d)
    the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safe
  • e)
    the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the present
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily store...
(A) It would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric power.
Option (A) suggests that the proposal would hinder the development of safe technologies for generating electricity. Nuclear power is one of the sources of electricity production, and while it has its challenges, it also has the potential for safe and efficient energy generation. By completely shutting down nuclear plants and not exploring alternative safe technologies, the proposal may limit the progress in finding better and safer methods of generating power. Therefore, this option highlights a potential drawback of the proposal.
(B) It does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safely.
This option suggests that the proposal fails to consider the varying safety records of different nuclear plants. Not all nuclear plants are equal in terms of safety measures, operational standards, and regulatory compliance. Some plants may have a reputation for operating safely and efficiently, while others may have had incidents or safety concerns. The proposal's blanket approach of shutting down all nuclear plants without distinguishing between their safety records may overlook the possibility of continuing operations at well-managed and secure plants, which could be a more viable solution. Thus, this option raises a valid concern about the proposal's lack of differentiation.
(C) It does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing waste.
As discussed earlier, this option highlights a significant shortcoming of the proposal. It fails to address the issue of permanent storage for the already-existing radioactive waste from nuclear plants. While the proposal suggests halting the operation of nuclear plants and preventing new ones from being built, it does not present a plan for the long-term disposal of the accumulated waste. Ignoring the existing waste could lead to environmental and safety risks. Therefore, this option correctly identifies a crucial aspect overlooked by the proposal.
(D) The generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safe.
Option (D) suggests that the proposal assumes the safety of generating electricity from fossil fuels. However, this statement is inaccurate. While fossil fuel power plants have been widely used, they come with their own set of safety and environmental concerns. The combustion of fossil fuels contributes to air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change. These issues pose significant risks to human health and the environment. Claiming that fossil fuel power generation is relatively safe is not supported by scientific evidence and overlooks the potential benefits of transitioning to cleaner and more sustainable energy sources.
(E) The risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the present.
Option (E) highlights a temporal imbalance between the risks and benefits associated with nuclear power plants. The risks of unsafe disposal of nuclear waste are long-term and can have consequences for future generations. On the other hand, the benefits of nuclear power plants, such as electricity generation and reduced greenhouse gas emissions, are realized in the present. The proposal fails to account for this imbalance by suggesting the immediate shutdown of nuclear plants without adequately addressing the long-term risks associated with the waste. Thus, this option correctly identifies a temporal mismatch in the proposal's approach.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily store...
(A) It would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric power.
Option (A) suggests that the proposal would hinder the development of safe technologies for generating electricity. Nuclear power is one of the sources of electricity production, and while it has its challenges, it also has the potential for safe and efficient energy generation. By completely shutting down nuclear plants and not exploring alternative safe technologies, the proposal may limit the progress in finding better and safer methods of generating power. Therefore, this option highlights a potential drawback of the proposal.
(B) It does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safely.
This option suggests that the proposal fails to consider the varying safety records of different nuclear plants. Not all nuclear plants are equal in terms of safety measures, operational standards, and regulatory compliance. Some plants may have a reputation for operating safely and efficiently, while others may have had incidents or safety concerns. The proposal's blanket approach of shutting down all nuclear plants without distinguishing between their safety records may overlook the possibility of continuing operations at well-managed and secure plants, which could be a more viable solution. Thus, this option raises a valid concern about the proposal's lack of differentiation.
(C) It does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing waste.
As discussed earlier, this option highlights a significant shortcoming of the proposal. It fails to address the issue of permanent storage for the already-existing radioactive waste from nuclear plants. While the proposal suggests halting the operation of nuclear plants and preventing new ones from being built, it does not present a plan for the long-term disposal of the accumulated waste. Ignoring the existing waste could lead to environmental and safety risks. Therefore, this option correctly identifies a crucial aspect overlooked by the proposal.
(D) The generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safe.
Option (D) suggests that the proposal assumes the safety of generating electricity from fossil fuels. However, this statement is inaccurate. While fossil fuel power plants have been widely used, they come with their own set of safety and environmental concerns. The combustion of fossil fuels contributes to air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change. These issues pose significant risks to human health and the environment. Claiming that fossil fuel power generation is relatively safe is not supported by scientific evidence and overlooks the potential benefits of transitioning to cleaner and more sustainable energy sources.
(E) The risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the present.
Option (E) highlights a temporal imbalance between the risks and benefits associated with nuclear power plants. The risks of unsafe disposal of nuclear waste are long-term and can have consequences for future generations. On the other hand, the benefits of nuclear power plants, such as electricity generation and reduced greenhouse gas emissions, are realized in the present. The proposal fails to account for this imbalance by suggesting the immediate shutdown of nuclear plants without adequately addressing the long-term risks associated with the waste. Thus, this option correctly identifies a temporal mismatch in the proposal's approach.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

The progress of astronomy has always been closely associated with the development and application of mechanical processes and skill. Before the seventeenth century, the size of the planets could not be measured, the satellites of the planets except the Earths moon were unknown, the phases of Mercury and Venus were merely conjectured, and accurate positions of the sun, moon, and planets among the stars, and of the stars among themselves, were impossible all because there were no telescopes. More than a half century elapsed after the invention of the telescope before Picard combined it with a graduated circle in such a way that the measurement of angles was greatly improved. Then arose the necessity for accurate time. Although Galileo had learned the principles governing the pendulum, astronomy had to wait for the mechanical genius of Huygens before a satisfactory clock was invented around 1657.Nearly all the large reflecting telescopes ever built were constructed by astronomers who possessed great facility in practical mechanics. The rapid and significant advances in nearly all departments of astronomy in the past century would not have been possible except through the skill and patience of glassmakers, opticians, and engineers. The principles of spectrum analysis as formulated by Kirchho allowed for the discovery of the elements composing every heavenly body. The deftness of Wollaston showed that light could not be analyzed unless it first passed through a very narrow slit. Even in our modern day the power of the telescope and spectroscope has been vastly extended by the optical skill and mechanical dexterity of individuals such as Rowland, Hastings and Brashear, all Americans.An observatory site should have a fairly unobstructed horizon, as much freedom from cloud as possible, good foundations for the instruments, and a very steady atmosphere. To understand the necessity of a steady atmosphere, look at some distant outdoor object through a window on a hot summer day. The object appears blurry and wavering. Similarly, currents of warm air continually rise from the earth to upper regions of the atmosphere, and colder air comes down and rushes underneath. Although these atmospheric movements are often invisible to the eye, their effect is plainly visible in the telescope as a blurry distortion. In order for an ideally-designed telescope to perform perfectly, it must be located in a perfect atmosphere. Otherwise its full power cannot be employed. All hindrances of atmosphere are most advantageously avoided in arid or desert regions of the globe, at elevations of 3000 to 10,000 feet above sea level. Higher mountains have as yet been only partially investigated, and it is not known whether difficulties of occupying them permanently would more than counterbalance the gain which greater elevation would afford.The primary purpose of this passage is to

Disruptive innovators can hurt successful and immensely profitable incumbents that tend to ignore the markets most susceptible to disruptive innovations. Disruptive innovators offer technologically straightforward solutions consisting of off-the-shelf components put together in a product architecture that is often simpler, initially lower performing, and cheaper than established approaches. Considering disruptive technologies unprofitable, the executives at incumbents often ignored them at their own and companies peril. In 1981, the old 8 inch drives used in mini computers were vastly superior and much more profitable to the new 5.25 inch drives used in desktop computers. However, 8 inch drives were not affordable for the new desktop machines. Slowly, the makers of 5.25 inch drives improved the performance of the drives and moved the 8 inch drive companies that did not invest in the 5.25 inch technology out of the market as the latter could not compete on price. Similarly, digital cameras, when introduced in 1997 performed extremely poorly as compared to traditional film cameras. Consequently, many traditional film companies such as Kodak ignored this market only to be bankrupted by the rise of digital cameras a decade later.Leaders and strategists should be cautious while rejecting a technology that does not seem to be as high performing and hence not as profitable as their dominant technologies. A technology that initially provides low performance can drastically improve over time and often exceed the performance of the dominant technology at a much lower price-point, a scenario that could potentially bankrupt the incumbents who ignored the technology at their peril.The author of the passage would make which of the following recommendations to the managers of the incumbents.

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses becausea)it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric powerb)it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safelyc)it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing wasted)the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safee)the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the presentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses becausea)it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric powerb)it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safelyc)it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing wasted)the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safee)the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the presentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses becausea)it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric powerb)it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safelyc)it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing wasted)the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safee)the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the presentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses becausea)it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric powerb)it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safelyc)it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing wasted)the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safee)the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the presentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses becausea)it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric powerb)it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safelyc)it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing wasted)the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safee)the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the presentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses becausea)it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric powerb)it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safelyc)it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing wasted)the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safee)the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the presentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses becausea)it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric powerb)it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safelyc)it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing wasted)the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safee)the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the presentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses becausea)it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric powerb)it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safelyc)it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing wasted)the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safee)the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the presentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses becausea)it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric powerb)it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safelyc)it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing wasted)the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safee)the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the presentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Radioactive waste from nuclear power plants has been temporarily stored on-site, but this is not a satisfactory kind of place for long-range storage. Since no suitable plan of safe permanent storage of such waste from the nation’s existing and planned nuclear plants has been devised, some people propose that we should stop trying to develop such a plan and instead should shut down all present nuclear plants and build no new nuclear plants.The proposal mentioned above falls short of offering a complete solution to the problem it addresses becausea)it would prevent the development of safe technologies for producing electric powerb)it does not distinguish between nuclear plants that have, and plants that do not have, a reputation for operating safelyc)it does not provide for the permanent storage of already-existing wasted)the generation of electric power from fossil fuels is relatively safee)the risks of unsafe disposal of waste from nuclear power plants lie in the future, but the benefits from such plants are in the presentCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup