Yesterday I saw an ice cube which had already melted due to heat of a ...
What has happened to the tecnical support of EduRev , does the option b make sense , decision should be made with the evidence in hand not by assumptions , by going on with the evidence the ice cube will melt please EduRev take look at the options and the correct answer carefully , this has happned in many logical questions
Yesterday I saw an ice cube which had already melted due to heat of a ...
Answer:
The correct answer to the given question is option 'B' - Never. The reason for this answer is as follows:
Explanation:
1. Melting of Ice Cube:
When an ice cube is exposed to heat, it undergoes a phase change from solid to liquid, resulting in the melting of the ice cube. This occurs when the temperature of the ice cube surpasses its melting point, which is 0 degrees Celsius or 32 degrees Fahrenheit.
2. Heat from a Nearby Furnace:
In the given scenario, the ice cube has melted due to the heat emitted by a nearby furnace. The furnace generates a significant amount of heat, raising the temperature in its vicinity.
3. Impact of Heat on Ice Cube:
As the ice cube is exposed to the heat from the nearby furnace, its temperature starts to rise. Eventually, the ice cube reaches its melting point, causing it to melt and transform into liquid water.
4. Conclusion:
Based on the given information, it is evident that the ice cube has melted due to the heat from the nearby furnace. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'B' - Never, as it is highly unlikely for an ice cube to melt solely due to the heat emitted by a nearby furnace.