All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
GMAT Exam  >  GMAT Questions  >  AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, i... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.
AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.
How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?
  • a)
    She misses Al’s point entirely.
  • b)
    She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.
  • c)
    She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.
  • d)
    She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.
  • e)
    She introduces a false analogy.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because...
Amy is presenting an alternative perspective or counter argument to the initial statement made by AL. She suggests that the reason we have not been contacted by aliens could be because they do not consider humans to be intelligent beings. This suggests that the lack of contact does not necessarily mean that aliens have not visited Earth, but rather that they may not view humans as worthy of communication.
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because...
(A) She misses Al's point entirely.
This option suggests that Amy fails to grasp the main point of Al's argument. However, Amy's response directly addresses and challenges Al's argument by providing an alternative explanation for the lack of contact with aliens. Therefore, Amy does not miss Al's point, making this option incorrect.
(B) She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.
This option implies that Amy launches a personal attack against Al rather than critiquing his reasoning. However, Amy's response does not attack Al personally but rather challenges the assumption he made in his argument. Amy engages with Al's reasoning and presents an alternative perspective, so this option is not applicable.
(C) She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.
This option accurately captures the relationship between Amy's response and Al's argument. Amy questions the assumption made by Al that aliens would be visiting Earth specifically to find other intelligent species for communication. By suggesting that aliens may not have considered humans as intelligent, she points out the unwarranted nature of Al's assumption. Therefore, this option is the correct explanation.
(D) She ignores the detailed internal development of Al's logic.
This option suggests that Amy disregards the detailed internal development of Al's logic. However, Amy's response directly challenges Al's assumption and provides an alternative explanation, indicating that she has considered and engaged with the logic presented. Therefore, this option is not applicable.
(E) She introduces a false analogy.
This option implies that Amy introduces a false analogy in her response. However, Amy's response does not involve the introduction of an analogy. She offers an alternative perspective on the intelligence of human beings as a potential reason for the lack of contact with aliens. Therefore, this option is not relevant to Amy's response.
Among the options provided, option (C) is the most accurate explanation for the relationship between Amy's response and Al's argument. Amy points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption, questioning the basis of his argument.
Attention GMAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed GMAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in GMAT.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Similar GMAT Doubts

Over the past 20,000 years, the average volume of the human male brain has decreased from 1,500 cubic centimeters to 1,350 cc, losing a chunk the size of a tennis ball. The female brain has shrunk by about the same proportion. If our brain keeps dwindling at this rate over the next 20,000 years, it will start to approach the size of the brain found in Homo erectus, a relative that lived half a million years ago and had a brain volume of only 1,100 cc.Some believe the erosion of our gray matter means that modern humans are indeed getting dumber. A common measure of intelligence - the encephalization quotient or EQ, defined as the ratio of brain volume to body mass - has been found to be decreasing in the recent past. Recent studies of human fossils suggest the brain shrank more quickly than the body in near-modern times. More importantly, analysis of the genome casts doubt on the notion that modern humans are simply daintier but otherwise identical versions of our ancestors, right down to how we think and feel. Another study concluded that our present EQ is the same as that of the Cro-Magnons - our ancestors who lived 30,000 years ago in Europe and were known more for brawniness rather than brilliance.On the other hand, other anthropologists such as Hawks believe that as the brain shrank, its wiring became more efficient, transforming us into quicker, more agile thinkers. They explain the shrinking by arguing that over the very period that the brain shrank, our DNA accumulated numerous adaptive mutations related to brain development and neurotransmitter systemsan indication that even as the organ got smaller, its inner workings changed.This explanation may be plausible, considering that the brain is such a glutton for fuel that it globs up to 20% of all the calories. To optimize this, the evolution may be moving towards a more efficient smaller brain that yields the most intelligence for the least energy. A boom in the human population in the last 20,000 years ago greatly improved the odds of such a fortuitous development since the more the individuals, the bigger the gene pool, and the greater the chance for an unusual advantageous mutation to happen.The man-made product that is closest to the brain, the microprocessor, has seen similar evolution. A microprocessor consists of transistors- the human equivalent of neuron that participates in decision making connected with wires that act as messengers between neurons. The first microprocessors had extremely simple architectures and were not optimized for a certain set of tasks but were more general purpose. Consequently, a lot of the power they consumed was dissipated in internal wiring and not in decision making. With refinements, the architectures became more and more attuned to the tasks that the microprocessor most commonly needed to do. Consequently, for the same number of transistors the amount of wiring decreased by a factor of 3 while the microprocessors processing speed increased by a factor of 10. While active research is still to conclude whether the same holds true in case of the brain, one can only hope that the results are along the lines of the microprocessor.Which of the following if true would weaken the assertion that humans are getting dumber with the erosion of brain volume?

Scholars studying diversity in students pursuing higher education stress the need for diversity among the faculty and staff of institutions offering such education. It is seen as a way of creating a more welcoming and supportive environment for minorities and of enhancing education for all students. Accordingly, they argue that hiring more Native American faculty and staff is a potential way to help others in the university to become more aware of and responsive to the challenges faced by some Native American students, thereby leading to more effective and culturally competent programs. However, this argument ignores a crucial ground reality. Even though many proponents of the idea discuss variations in cultural orientations among indigenous people, there seems to be an assumption that Native American professors and students share common values and hence teachers of Native American ethnicity are thought to have more insight than their counterparts from other ethnicities into Native American students. But the reality is that Native Americans form an extremely heterogeneous population. Students and teachers of Native American origin can differ in a variety of ways, such as tribal background and level of connection to their culture, and therefore making blanket assumptions about the cultural identity of Native American people who become faculty is just as inappropriate as it is to make stereotypical assumptions about Native American people in general. Accordingly, before any key changes are implemented, it would be reasonable to probe how Native American people who have achieved an extensive background in higher education differ culturally from their tribal communities of origin.What can be inferred from the following statement made in the passage?making blanket assumptions about the cultural identity of Native American people who become faculty is just as inappropriate as it is to make stereotypical assumptions about Native American people in general...

PassageIn the fast-evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, recent debates have surfaced regarding the ethical implications of deploying advanced AI systems in critical domains such as healthcare and finance. The author, Sarah Thompson, explores the intersection of AI and ethics, highlighting the potential pitfalls and the urgent need for responsible development and deployment.Thompson begins by addressing the increasing integration of AI in decision-making processes, emphasizing the risk of bias and discrimination inherent in algorithms trained on biased datasets. She points to instances where AI systems have perpetuated existing societal inequalities, raising concerns about the ethical implications of such unintentional consequences.Moving beyond biases, Thompson delves into the issue of transparency in AI systems. She argues that the opacity of many advanced AI algorithms poses a significant ethical challenge, as users, and even developers, struggle to understand the decision-making processes of these complex systems. The lack of transparency, she contends, hinders accountability and exacerbates ethical concerns surrounding AI applications.The exposé then shifts to the ethical considerations in AI-driven automation, particularly in industries where jobs are at risk of displacement. Thompson asserts that responsible AI development should prioritize the well-being of workers and ensure that the benefits of automation are equitably distributed. The ethical framework, she argues, should extend beyond mere technological advancements to encompass the broader societal impact of AI implementation.Q.It can be inferred from the passage that Sarah Thompson would be most likely to agree with which of the following statements regarding AI development?

Top Courses for GMATView all

Top Courses for GMAT

AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?a)She misses Al’s point entirely.b)She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.c)She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.d)She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.e)She introduces a false analogy.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?a)She misses Al’s point entirely.b)She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.c)She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.d)She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.e)She introduces a false analogy.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?a)She misses Al’s point entirely.b)She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.c)She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.d)She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.e)She introduces a false analogy.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?a)She misses Al’s point entirely.b)She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.c)She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.d)She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.e)She introduces a false analogy.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?a)She misses Al’s point entirely.b)She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.c)She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.d)She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.e)She introduces a false analogy.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?a)She misses Al’s point entirely.b)She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.c)She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.d)She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.e)She introduces a false analogy.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?a)She misses Al’s point entirely.b)She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.c)She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.d)She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.e)She introduces a false analogy.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?a)She misses Al’s point entirely.b)She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.c)She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.d)She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.e)She introduces a false analogy.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?a)She misses Al’s point entirely.b)She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.c)She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.d)She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.e)She introduces a false analogy.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice AL: If an alien species ever visited Earth, it would surely be because they were looking for other intelligent species with whom they could communicate. Since we have not been contacted by aliens, we may conclude that none have ever visited this planet.AMY: Or, perhaps, they did not think human beings intelligent.How is Amy’s response related to Al’s argument?a)She misses Al’s point entirely.b)She attacks Al personally rather than his reasoning.c)She points out that Al made an unwarranted assumption.d)She ignores the detailed internal development of Al’s logic.e)She introduces a false analogy.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.
Explore Courses for GMAT exam

Top Courses for GMAT

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup