Question Description
The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.a)X can be held responsible for trespass to goods.b)X cannot be held responsible for trespass to good as he was under a wrong belief.c)X has not committed any wrongd)None of the above.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.