Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Humanities/Arts Exam > Humanities/Arts Questions > Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civ...

Join the Discussion on the App

Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.
Facts: 'B' was formally invited by 'A' to his house. 'B' after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. 'A' used 'B' for trespass.

a)
'B' has interfered with privacy of 'A'
b)
'B' has committed no trespass as he entered the house with 'A's consent
c)
'B' has offended 'A' by moving to bed room
d)
'B' has committed trespass as there was no consent of 'A' for entry in the Bed room

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Topics of Law- 1

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but th...

Answer:

Principle: Consent is a good defense in a civil action for tort, but the act should be the same for which consent was given.

Facts:
- A formally invited B to his house.
- B, after sitting for some time in the drawing room, moved to the bedroom of the house.
- A accused B of trespassing.

Explanation:

The correct answer is option 'B': B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with A's consent.

Reasoning:

1. Consent as a Defense: In civil law, consent is generally considered a good defense against claims of tort. If a person gives their consent for an act, it can serve as a defense against any legal action related to that act.

2. Principle Application: According to the principle mentioned, consent can be used as a defense in a civil action for tort. However, for this defense to be valid, the act for which consent was given must be the same as the act in question.

3. Formal Invitation: In the given facts, it is stated that A formally invited B to his house. This implies that A gave his explicit consent for B to enter the house.

4. Act of Trespass: B, after sitting in the drawing room for some time, moved to the bedroom of the house. A accuses B of trespassing for entering the bedroom without consent.

5. Consent and Trespass: As per the principle, consent should be for the same act in question. In this case, A consented to B entering the house by giving a formal invitation. Therefore, B did not commit trespass when entering the bedroom as the consent given by A covered B's entry into the house.

6. Conclusion: Based on the principle and the facts provided, it can be concluded that B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with A's consent. Option 'B' is the correct answer.

Answered by Crafty Classes · View profile

Free Test

FREE

Test: Topics of Law- 1
10 Ques | 20 Min

Start Free Test

View all free Humanities/Arts tests

Community Answer

Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but th...

B has not committed tresoass in above case as A has invited B in his house . And , bedroom is just a part of his house . B can enter his house without any bad intention to cause injury or physical harm . Trespass can be determined as the illegal action done legitimately and deliberately to make the mischief another property can be named as trespass. It is of two sorts of common and criminal wrong. It is so on the grounds that it can have two various types of wounds for example it can prompt the infringement of human rights which prompts the harms .

Share via Whatsapp

Attention Humanities/Arts Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Humanities/Arts study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Humanities/Arts.

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam

Similar Humanities/Arts Doubts

Directions: The question consists of one or more principle and some facts. You are to examine the principle(s) and apply it/them to the given facts carefully, and select the best option.Principle 1: Trespass on land means to interfere with someones possession without lawful justification. Trespass can be committed by the trespasser himself by entering the land, or by the trespasser doing it through the use of some object.Principle 2: Trespass can be committed intentionally, negligently or even accidentally.Facts: Satyam lived in a big house surrounded by substantial lush green land. The police were catching a thief, who accidentally entered into the land of Satyam. The police also followed him into the land, since they wanted to find him. The police were able to catch the thief, but the state was sued for trespass on land.

View answer

Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer.Principle: The owner of a land is entitled to the column of air space above the surface ad infinitum. But, the right is restricted to such height as is necessary for the ordinary used and employment of his land, and the structure on it. A had constructed a single-storeyed house on a corner site. He had no intention of building an additional floor. B is neighbour, who ran an internet parlour got a hoarding made, which protruded over As house at a height of around66feet above the terrace. A sues B for trespass.

View answer

Given below is a statement of legal principle followed by factual situation. Apply the principle to the facts and select the most appropriate answer.Principle: The owner of a land is entitled to the column of air space above the surface ad infinitum. But, the right is restricted to such height as is necessary for the ordinary used and employment of his land, and the structure on it. A had constructed a single-storeyed house on a corner site. He had no intention of building an additional floor. B is neighbour, who ran an internet parlour got a hoarding made, which protruded over As house at a height of around 66 feet above the terrace. A sues B for trespass.

View answer

The question consist of two statements, one labelled as PRINCIPLE and other as FACT. You are to examine the principle and apply it to the given facts carefully and select the best option.PRINCIPLE: Any direct physical interference with the goods in somebodys possession without lawful justification is called trespass to goods.FACT: A purchased a car from a person who had no title to it and had sent it to a garage for repair. X, believing, wrongly, that the car was his, removed it from the garage.

View answer

Directions: In this question, one or more principle(s) is/are given and is/are followed by fact(s). Read the principle(s) carefully and apply it/them to the given fact(s) and choose the most appropriate option.Principle 1: Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any movable property out of the possession of any person without that persons consent moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft.Principle 2: Whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property or with any dominion over property, dishonestly misappropriates or converts to his own use that property or dishonestly uses or disposes of that property in violation of any direction of law prescribing the mode in which such trust is to be discharged or of any legal contract, express or implied, which he has made touching the discharge of such trust or wilfully suffers any other person so to do, commits criminal breach of trust.Facts: Ramlal, going on pilgrimage to Ayodhya, entrusts his gold plate to Arunesh, the keeper of a warehouse, till Ramlal shall return. Arunesh carries the plate to a goldsmith and sells it.Q.What offence has been committed by Arunesh, if any?

View answer

Top Courses for Humanities/ArtsView all

Chapter Notes for Humanities

NCERT Books & Solutions for Humanities

Online MCQ Tests for Humanities

Short & Long Question Answers for Humanities

Geography Class 11

Top Courses for Humanities/Arts

View all

Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Humanities/Arts 2024 is part of Humanities/Arts preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Humanities/Arts exam syllabus. Information about Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Humanities/Arts 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Humanities/Arts. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Humanities/Arts Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Principle: Consent is a good defence in a civil action for tort but the act should be the same for which consent was given.Facts: B was formally invited by A to his house. B after sitting for some time in drawing room, moved to the bed room of the house. A used B for trespass.a)B has interfered with privacy of Ab)B has committed no trespass as he entered the house with As consentc)B has offended A by moving to bed roomd)B has committed trespass as there was no consent of A for entry in the Bed roomCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Humanities/Arts tests.

Explore Courses for Humanities/Arts exam