UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute? Start Learning for Free
Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute?
Most Upvoted Answer
Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute?
The Cauvery Water Dispute between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka

The Cauvery water dispute is a long-standing conflict between the southern Indian states of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka over the sharing of the waters of the Cauvery River. The dispute dates back to the British colonial era and has been a source of tension and conflict between the two states for decades. Here is a detailed explanation of the issue:

Background:
The Cauvery River is one of the major rivers in South India, originating in Karnataka and flowing through Tamil Nadu before emptying into the Bay of Bengal. It is a lifeline for both states, supporting agriculture, drinking water supply, and hydroelectric power generation. The conflict arises from the unequal distribution of water between the two states.

Reasons for the Dispute:
1. Historical Agreements: The dispute stems from two agreements - the 1892 and 1924 agreements - between the Madras Presidency (now Tamil Nadu) and the princely state of Mysore (now Karnataka) during the British colonial period. These agreements allocated a certain amount of water to each state, but they did not specify a formula for sharing during times of scarcity.

2. Changing Climate and Increased Demand: Over the years, both states have witnessed population growth and increased agricultural and industrial activities, leading to a higher demand for water resources. Climate change has also resulted in reduced rainfall and erratic monsoons, further exacerbating the water scarcity.

Legal and Political Developments:
1. Cauvery Water Tribunal (CWT): In 1990, the Indian government constituted the Cauvery Water Disputes Tribunal to resolve the conflict. The tribunal made several interim and final awards, attempting to strike a balance between the needs of both states. However, these decisions have faced resistance and have been subject to legal challenges.

2. Protests and Violence: The dispute has often led to protests and violence, with farmers, political parties, and civil society organizations from both states demanding their fair share of water. These protests have sometimes turned violent, resulting in loss of lives and property.

3. Supreme Court Interventions: The Supreme Court of India has been involved in resolving the conflict and ensuring compliance with the tribunal's decisions. It has issued various orders and directions to both states, often mediating between them to find a solution.

Current Status:
The Cauvery water dispute remains unresolved, with periodic flare-ups of tensions between Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. The issue continues to be a major political and social concern in both states, affecting the livelihoods of farmers and the overall development of the region.

Conclusion:
The Cauvery water dispute is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a comprehensive and sustainable solution. It involves not only the legal and political aspects but also the socio-economic and environmental dimensions. The need for equitable sharing of water resources, efficient water management, and the mitigation of climate change impacts are crucial for resolving the dispute and ensuring the well-being of the people in both Tamil Nadu and Karnataka.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

The biggest gain from the Union Governments welcome decision to notify the final award of the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal is that it may be the first and most significant step towards a permanent solution to the persistent conflict over sharing the inter-State rivers waters. A positive feature is that implementation ofthe final award will involve the formation of a Cauvery Management Board to regulate the supply of water and a Water Regulation Committee, which will post representatives in each of the eight reservoirs in the basin states, to ensure that the decisions are carried out. Giving finality to the award through the notification may help take the issue away from politics and place it in the hands of a technical, expert body. The February 2007 award has been questioned by way of clarification petitions before the Tribunal itself as well as suits in the Supreme Court by both parties and sceptics may wonder how useful the gazette notification may be now. The parties are still free to pursue their clarification petitions and appeals, but in the larger interest of a long term solution and to end seasonal acrimony, they would do well to give the award a chance.The fact that notifying the award has been a long pending demand ofTamil Nadu should not make one believe that the action redounds to one partys benefit to the detriment of the other. It was the Supreme Court that made the suggestion that thefinal decision be notified and counsel for all the basin states have agreed that it should be done. It may be argued that gazetting the award will not resolve the present standoff over judicial and administrative directives to Karnataka to release water to save standing crops in Tamil Nadu. The Cauvery Monitoring Committee, while asking Karnataka to ensure 12 thousand million cubic feet of water to Tamil Nadu in December, has itself admitted that its decision is unlikely to satisfy either party, given that both states have less water in their reservoirs than in previous years. Yet, is has opted for a pragmatic solution under which both states will be in deficit of approximately 47 tmcft. It is the same spirit of pragmatism that both states must now approach the larger problem of sharing water as per a judicially determined solution in both normal and distress years. The two should not let posterity say of them that long after equitable distribution has entrenched itself as the most acceptable doctrine in riverine jurisprudence, they did not allow a judicially determines system for sharing to work.Q.It can be inferred that notifying the final award of the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal could lead to

The biggest gain from the Union Governments welcome decision to notify the final award of the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal is that it may be the first and most significant step towards a permanent solution to the persistent conflict over sharing the inter-State rivers waters. A positive feature is that implementation ofthe final award will involve the formation of a Cauvery Management Board to regulate the supply of water and a Water Regulation Committee, which will post representatives in each of the eight reservoirs in the basin states, to ensure that the decisions are carried out. Giving finality to the award through the notification may help take the issue away from politics and place it in the hands of a technical, expert body. The February 2007 award has been questioned by way of clarification petitions before the Tribunal itself as well as suits in the Supreme Court by both parties and sceptics may wonder how useful the gazette notification may be now. The parties are still free to pursue their clarification petitions and appeals, but in the larger interest of a long term solution and to end seasonal acrimony, they would do well to give the award a chance.The fact that notifying the award has been a long pending demand ofTamil Nadu should not make one believe that the action redounds to one partys benefit to the detriment of the other. It was the Supreme Court that made the suggestion that thefinal decision be notified and counsel for all the basin states have agreed that it should be done. It may be argued that gazetting the award will not resolve the present standoff over judicial and administrative directives to Karnataka to release water to save standing crops in Tamil Nadu. The Cauvery Monitoring Committee, while asking Karnataka to ensure 12 thousand million cubic feet of water to Tamil Nadu in December, has itself admitted that its decision is unlikely to satisfy either party, given that both states have less water in their reservoirs than in previous years. Yet, is has opted for a pragmatic solution under which both states will be in deficit of approximately 47 tmcft. It is the same spirit of pragmatism that both states must now approach the larger problem of sharing water as per a judicially determined solution in both normal and distress years. The two should not let posterity say of them that long after equitable distribution has entrenched itself as the most acceptable doctrine in riverine jurisprudence, they did not allow a judicially determines system for sharing to work.Q.Which of the following options cannot be inferred as a negation with respect to the award of the tribunal?

Top Courses for UPSC

Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute?
Question Description
Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute?.
Solutions for Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute?, a detailed solution for Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute? has been provided alongside types of Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Tamilnadu karnataka cauvery water dispute? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev