All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
UPSC Exam  >  UPSC Questions  >  Whether release of water from cauvery in Karn... Start Learning for Free
Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka?
Clear all your UPSC doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will a...
Introduction:
The release of water from the Cauvery river in Karnataka to Tamil Nadu can have significant effects on Karnataka. The Cauvery river is a major source of water for both states, and any alteration in the water flow can lead to various consequences. In this response, we will discuss the potential impacts of releasing water from the Cauvery river on Karnataka.

1. Water scarcity:
- Reduced water availability: The release of water to Tamil Nadu can lead to a decrease in the water availability for Karnataka. As a result, the state may face water scarcity, particularly in areas that depend heavily on the Cauvery river for irrigation and drinking water purposes.
- Agricultural impact: Karnataka is an agrarian state, and a decrease in water availability can adversely affect agriculture. Farmers may face challenges in irrigating their crops, leading to reduced agricultural productivity and potential crop failures.

2. Economic implications:
- Loss of revenue: Karnataka relies on agriculture for a significant portion of its economy. Reduced agricultural productivity due to water scarcity can result in financial losses for farmers, which in turn can impact the overall economic growth of the state.
- Unemployment: Agriculture-related industries, such as food processing and manufacturing, may also be negatively affected by water scarcity. This can result in job losses and increased unemployment rates in the state.

3. Social consequences:
- Public unrest: Water scarcity can lead to public unrest and protests, as access to water is vital for daily life. People may have to travel long distances to fetch water, leading to inconvenience and frustration.
- Health hazards: Inadequate water availability can also pose health risks, as it may affect sanitation and hygiene practices. Waterborne diseases may become more prevalent, further burdening the healthcare system.

4. Environmental impacts:
- Ecological imbalance: The reduced flow of water in the Cauvery river can disrupt the ecosystem and impact the flora and fauna dependent on the river. This can have long-term consequences for biodiversity and ecological balance in the region.
- Groundwater depletion: If there is a lack of surface water due to reduced flow in the Cauvery river, farmers may resort to excessive groundwater extraction. This can lead to the depletion of groundwater resources, causing long-term damage to the aquifers.

Conclusion:
The release of water from the Cauvery river in Karnataka to Tamil Nadu can have significant consequences for Karnataka. It can result in water scarcity, economic losses, social unrest, and environmental impacts. Therefore, it is crucial for both states to find a balanced solution that addresses the water needs of both regions while considering the long-term sustainability of water resources.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Similar UPSC Doubts

The biggest gain from the Union Governments welcome decision to notify the final award of the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal is that it may be the first and most significant step towards a permanent solution to the persistent conflict over sharing the inter-State rivers waters. A positive feature is that implementation ofthe final award will involve the formation of a Cauvery Management Board to regulate the supply of water and a Water Regulation Committee, which will post representatives in each of the eight reservoirs in the basin states, to ensure that the decisions are carried out. Giving finality to the award through the notification may help take the issue away from politics and place it in the hands of a technical, expert body. The February 2007 award has been questioned by way of clarification petitions before the Tribunal itself as well as suits in the Supreme Court by both parties and sceptics may wonder how useful the gazette notification may be now. The parties are still free to pursue their clarification petitions and appeals, but in the larger interest of a long term solution and to end seasonal acrimony, they would do well to give the award a chance.The fact that notifying the award has been a long pending demand ofTamil Nadu should not make one believe that the action redounds to one partys benefit to the detriment of the other. It was the Supreme Court that made the suggestion that thefinal decision be notified and counsel for all the basin states have agreed that it should be done. It may be argued that gazetting the award will not resolve the present standoff over judicial and administrative directives to Karnataka to release water to save standing crops in Tamil Nadu. The Cauvery Monitoring Committee, while asking Karnataka to ensure 12 thousand million cubic feet of water to Tamil Nadu in December, has itself admitted that its decision is unlikely to satisfy either party, given that both states have less water in their reservoirs than in previous years. Yet, is has opted for a pragmatic solution under which both states will be in deficit of approximately 47 tmcft. It is the same spirit of pragmatism that both states must now approach the larger problem of sharing water as per a judicially determined solution in both normal and distress years. The two should not let posterity say of them that long after equitable distribution has entrenched itself as the most acceptable doctrine in riverine jurisprudence, they did not allow a judicially determines system for sharing to work.Q.It can be inferred that notifying the final award of the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal could lead to

The biggest gain from the Union Governments welcome decision to notify the final award of the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal is that it may be the first and most significant step towards a permanent solution to the persistent conflict over sharing the inter-State rivers waters. A positive feature is that implementation ofthe final award will involve the formation of a Cauvery Management Board to regulate the supply of water and a Water Regulation Committee, which will post representatives in each of the eight reservoirs in the basin states, to ensure that the decisions are carried out. Giving finality to the award through the notification may help take the issue away from politics and place it in the hands of a technical, expert body. The February 2007 award has been questioned by way of clarification petitions before the Tribunal itself as well as suits in the Supreme Court by both parties and sceptics may wonder how useful the gazette notification may be now. The parties are still free to pursue their clarification petitions and appeals, but in the larger interest of a long term solution and to end seasonal acrimony, they would do well to give the award a chance.The fact that notifying the award has been a long pending demand ofTamil Nadu should not make one believe that the action redounds to one partys benefit to the detriment of the other. It was the Supreme Court that made the suggestion that thefinal decision be notified and counsel for all the basin states have agreed that it should be done. It may be argued that gazetting the award will not resolve the present standoff over judicial and administrative directives to Karnataka to release water to save standing crops in Tamil Nadu. The Cauvery Monitoring Committee, while asking Karnataka to ensure 12 thousand million cubic feet of water to Tamil Nadu in December, has itself admitted that its decision is unlikely to satisfy either party, given that both states have less water in their reservoirs than in previous years. Yet, is has opted for a pragmatic solution under which both states will be in deficit of approximately 47 tmcft. It is the same spirit of pragmatism that both states must now approach the larger problem of sharing water as per a judicially determined solution in both normal and distress years. The two should not let posterity say of them that long after equitable distribution has entrenched itself as the most acceptable doctrine in riverine jurisprudence, they did not allow a judicially determines system for sharing to work.Q.Which of the following options cannot be inferred as a negation with respect to the award of the tribunal?

The biggest gain from the Union Governments welcome decision to notify the final award of the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal is that it may be the first and most significant step towards a permanent solution to the persistent conflict over sharing the inter-State rivers waters. A positive feature is that implementation ofthe final award will involve the formation of a Cauvery Management Board to regulate the supply of water and a Water Regulation Committee, which will post representatives in each of the eight reservoirs in the basin states, to ensure that the decisions are carried out. Giving finality to the award through the notification may help take the issue away from politics and place it in the hands of a technical, expert body. The February 2007 award has been questioned by way of clarification petitions before the Tribunal itself as well as suits in the Supreme Court by both parties and sceptics may wonder how useful the gazette notification may be now. The parties are still free to pursue their clarification petitions and appeals, but in the larger interest of a long term solution and to end seasonal acrimony, they would do well to give the award a chance.The fact that notifying the award has been a long pending demand ofTamil Nadu should not make one believe that the action redounds to one partys benefit to the detriment of the other. It was the Supreme Court that made the suggestion that thefinal decision be notified and counsel for all the basin states have agreed that it should be done. It may be argued that gazetting the award will not resolve the present standoff over judicial and administrative directives to Karnataka to release water to save standing crops in Tamil Nadu. The Cauvery Monitoring Committee, while asking Karnataka to ensure 12 thousand million cubic feet of water to Tamil Nadu in December, has itself admitted that its decision is unlikely to satisfy either party, given that both states have less water in their reservoirs than in previous years. Yet, is has opted for a pragmatic solution under which both states will be in deficit of approximately 47 tmcft. It is the same spirit of pragmatism that both states must now approach the larger problem of sharing water as per a judicially determined solution in both normal and distress years. The two should not let posterity say of them that long after equitable distribution has entrenched itself as the most acceptable doctrine in riverine jurisprudence, they did not allow a judicially determines system for sharing to work.Q.Consider the following assumptions:1. The 2 parties in the dispute should favour the setting up of the tribunal as it will bring some resolution to the issue2. The dispute between the 2 parties is best solved through the judicial route.Which of the following assumptions are valid?

Top Courses for UPSCView all

Top Courses for UPSC

Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka?
Question Description
Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka? for UPSC 2025 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka?.
Solutions for Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka?, a detailed solution for Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka? has been provided alongside types of Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Whether release of water from cauvery in Karnataka to tamilnadu will affect karnataka? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
Explore Courses for UPSC exam

Top Courses for UPSC

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup