Reordering the sentence: May the elders fray all the children into the drawing quarrel?

Explanation:
The original sentence is not grammatically correct and does not make sense. However, by reordering the sentence, it becomes clearer.

Subject-Verb Agreement:
The sentence begins with the word "may," which is a modal verb used to express possibility or permission. The verb "fray" follows, which means to cause a fight or argument. The subject of the sentence is "the elders." Therefore, the sentence is written in the form of a question, asking if the elders have permission to start a quarrel among the children.

Object-Verb Agreement:
The phrase "all the children" is the object of the verb "fray," indicating that the elders want to involve all the children in the quarrel. The preposition "into" is used to show the direction of the action - the elders want to lead the children into the quarrel.

Object-Subject Agreement:
Finally, the phrase "the drawing quarrel" is the object of the preposition "into," indicating where the elders want to lead the children. The word "drawing" is ambiguous and could refer to a literal drawing or a quarrel over something that was drawn. However, without further context, it is impossible to determine the exact meaning.

In conclusion, by reordering the sentence and analyzing its parts, we can understand that it is a question asking if the elders have permission to involve all the children in a quarrel and lead them into a drawing-related dispute.

Children may quarrel all the time drawing the elders into fray. {u r missing the word 'time' in question. } mention in question tangi.