UPSC Exam > UPSC Questions > Consider the following statements regarding d...
Start Learning for Free
Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void.
- According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses.
- The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
- a)1 only
- b)2 only
- c)Both 1 and 2
- d)Neither 1 nor 2
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of ...
Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 enables the High Court to declare an election void on certain grounds (Conviction of certain offences, Corrupt practices, Failing to declare election expenses, Interests in government contracts or works). The aggrieved person can appeal to the Supreme Court against the order of the High Court.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of ...
The correct answer is option 'D' - Neither 1 nor 2.
Explanation:
Let us analyze each statement separately:
Statement 1: According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses.
This statement is incorrect. According to the Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951, both the Supreme Court and the High Court have the power to declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void. The Supreme Court has the power to declare an election void on grounds of corrupt practices or failing to declare election expenses, while the High Court can declare an election void on various other grounds such as bribery, undue influence, false statements, etc. Therefore, statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 2: The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.
This statement is also incorrect. The aggrieved person can appeal against the order of the Court. If the Supreme Court declares the election of a Member of Parliament as void, the aggrieved person can file an appeal before the Supreme Court itself. If the High Court declares the election void, the aggrieved person can appeal to the Supreme Court. The matter does not have to be settled by the Election Commission. Therefore, statement 2 is incorrect.
In conclusion, neither statement 1 nor statement 2 is correct. Both statements are incorrect.
Explanation:
Let us analyze each statement separately:
Statement 1: According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses.
This statement is incorrect. According to the Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951, both the Supreme Court and the High Court have the power to declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void. The Supreme Court has the power to declare an election void on grounds of corrupt practices or failing to declare election expenses, while the High Court can declare an election void on various other grounds such as bribery, undue influence, false statements, etc. Therefore, statement 1 is incorrect.
Statement 2: The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.
This statement is also incorrect. The aggrieved person can appeal against the order of the Court. If the Supreme Court declares the election of a Member of Parliament as void, the aggrieved person can file an appeal before the Supreme Court itself. If the High Court declares the election void, the aggrieved person can appeal to the Supreme Court. The matter does not have to be settled by the Election Commission. Therefore, statement 2 is incorrect.
In conclusion, neither statement 1 nor statement 2 is correct. Both statements are incorrect.
Attention UPSC Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UPSC study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UPSC.
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Similar UPSC Doubts
Top Courses for UPSCView all
Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for UPSC 2024 is part of UPSC preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UPSC exam syllabus. Information about Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UPSC 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UPSC.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UPSC Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Consider the following statements regarding declaring the election of a Member of Parliament as null and void. According to Representation of the People Act (RPA), 1951 only the Supreme Court can declare an election of a Member of Parliament as void on grounds of Corrupt practices or Failing to declare election expenses. The aggrieved person cannot appeal against the order of the Court and the matter has to be settled by the Election Commission.Which of the above statements is/are correct?a)1 onlyb)2 onlyc)Both 1 and 2d)Neither 1 nor 2Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UPSC tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UPSC exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup