CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Direction: Read the following passage careful... Start Learning for Free
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them.  The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.
Q. Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?
  • a)
    To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.
  • b)
    To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.
  • c)
    To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.
  • d)
    To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
The Supreme Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it to prevent potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court recognized that online platforms have the capacity to reach a global audience instantaneously, and as a result, false and damaging information can spread quickly and cause significant harm to an individual's reputation. Therefore, to address this issue and protect individuals from defamation in the digital realm, the Court emphasized the responsibility of media outlets to verify the accuracy of information they publish. Option D accurately reflects the Court's rationale in making this ruling.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The Constitution allows for certain reasonable restrictions with respect to freedom of speech and expression on grounds such as national security, public order, decency, and morality. The IT Act prohibits uploading or sharing content which is obscene, sexually explicit, relates to child sex abuse, or violates a person’s privacy. The 2021 Rules specify certain additional restrictions on the types of information users of intermediary platforms can create, upload, or share. These include: (i) “harmful to child”, (ii) “insulting on the basis of gender”, and (iii) “knowingly and intentionally communicates any information which is patently false or misleading in nature but may reasonably be perceived as a fact”. Some of these restrictions are subjective and overbroad, and may adversely affect the freedom of speech and expression of users of intermediary platforms. The Supreme Court (2015) has held that a restriction on speech, in order to be reasonable, must be narrowly tailored so as to restrict only what is absolutely necessary. It also held that a speech can be limited on the grounds under the Constitution when it reaches the level of incitement. Other forms of speech even if offensive or unpopular remain protected under the Constitution. The Rules require the intermediaries to make these restrictions part of their service agreement with users. This implies that users must exercise prior restraint, and intermediaries may interpret and decide upon the lawfulness of content on these grounds. Such overbroad grounds under the Rules may not give a person clarity on what is restricted and may create a ‘chilling effect’ on their freedom of speech and expression. This may also lead to over-compliance from intermediaries as their exemption from liability is contingent upon observing due diligence.Q. Rahul, a devoted user of a social media platform, shared a satirical meme targeting a political leader. The meme, while not containing any explicit content, featured an offensive caption alongside the leaders image. Citing the 2021 Rules, the platform took down the post and temporarily suspended Rahuls account. Can Rahul legally contest the platforms action in court?

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The Constitution allows for certain reasonable restrictions with respect to freedom of speech and expression on grounds such as national security, public order, decency, and morality. The IT Act prohibits uploading or sharing content which is obscene, sexually explicit, relates to child sex abuse, or violates a person’s privacy. The 2021 Rules specify certain additional restrictions on the types of information users of intermediary platforms can create, upload, or share. These include: (i) “harmful to child”, (ii) “insulting on the basis of gender”, and (iii) “knowingly and intentionally communicates any information which is patently false or misleading in nature but may reasonably be perceived as a fact”. Some of these restrictions are subjective and overbroad, and may adversely affect the freedom of speech and expression of users of intermediary platforms. The Supreme Court (2015) has held that a restriction on speech, in order to be reasonable, must be narrowly tailored so as to restrict only what is absolutely necessary. It also held that a speech can be limited on the grounds under the Constitution when it reaches the level of incitement. Other forms of speech even if offensive or unpopular remain protected under the Constitution. The Rules require the intermediaries to make these restrictions part of their service agreement with users. This implies that users must exercise prior restraint, and intermediaries may interpret and decide upon the lawfulness of content on these grounds. Such overbroad grounds under the Rules may not give a person clarity on what is restricted and may create a ‘chilling effect’ on their freedom of speech and expression. This may also lead to over-compliance from intermediaries as their exemption from liability is contingent upon observing due diligence.Q. Which of the following is NOT mentioned as a ground for reasonable restrictions on freedom of speech and expression in the Constitution?

Directions: Kindly read the passage carefully and answer the questions given beside.The Constitution allows for certain reasonable restrictions with respect to freedom of speech and expression on grounds such as national security, public order, decency, and morality. The IT Act prohibits uploading or sharing content which is obscene, sexually explicit, relates to child sex abuse, or violates a person’s privacy. The 2021 Rules specify certain additional restrictions on the types of information users of intermediary platforms can create, upload, or share. These include: (i) “harmful to child”, (ii) “insulting on the basis of gender”, and (iii) “knowingly and intentionally communicates any information which is patently false or misleading in nature but may reasonably be perceived as a fact”. Some of these restrictions are subjective and overbroad, and may adversely affect the freedom of speech and expression of users of intermediary platforms. The Supreme Court (2015) has held that a restriction on speech, in order to be reasonable, must be narrowly tailored so as to restrict only what is absolutely necessary. It also held that a speech can be limited on the grounds under the Constitution when it reaches the level of incitement. Other forms of speech even if offensive or unpopular remain protected under the Constitution. The Rules require the intermediaries to make these restrictions part of their service agreement with users. This implies that users must exercise prior restraint, and intermediaries may interpret and decide upon the lawfulness of content on these grounds. Such overbroad grounds under the Rules may not give a person clarity on what is restricted and may create a ‘chilling effect’ on their freedom of speech and expression. This may also lead to over-compliance from intermediaries as their exemption from liability is contingent upon observing due diligence.Q. According to the 2021 Rules, which of the following is NOT listed as a restriction on the types of information users of intermediary platforms can create, upload, or share?

Directions: Read the following passage and answer the question.The Constitution of India guarantees to all its citizens certain fundamental freedoms, which are recognized as their fundamental rights. However, these fundamental freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution of India are not absolute as no right can be. Each of these fundamental rights is liable to be controlled, curtailed and regulated to some extent by laws made by the Parliament or the State Legislatures. Accordingly, the Constitution of India lays down the grounds and the purposes for which a legislature can impose reasonable restrictions on the rights guaranteed to citizens. The State cannot travel beyond the contours of these reasonable restrictions in curbing the fundamental rights guaranteed to citizens. While determining the constitutional validity of a restriction imposed on a fundamental right by a legislation, the Court is not concerned with the necessity of the restriction or the wisdom of the policy underlying it, but only whether the restriction is in excess of the requirement, and whether the legislature has overstepped the Constitutional limitations. Two of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen of India are- the right to move freely throughout the territory of India and the right to reside and settle in any part of India. However, the State may impose reasonable restrictions on these rights by law, in the interests of the general public or for the protection of the interests of any Scheduled tribes.Q.The appropriate authority in a State passed an externment order against Mr. A, a citizen of India. The externment order prohibited Mr. A, from residing within the State, from the date specified in such order. The externment order was passed by virtue of powers conferred on the appropriate authority by law, and the constitutional validity of this law had been upheld by the Supreme Court of India. The externment order was passed on the ground that Mr. A was found to be frequently engaged in illegal business of narcotic drugs and was also involved in several cases of riot and criminal intimidation. In the given situation, which of the following statements is correct regarding the externment order?

Top Courses for CLAT

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?a)To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.b)To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.c)To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.d)To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?a)To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.b)To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.c)To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.d)To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?a)To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.b)To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.c)To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.d)To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?a)To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.b)To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.c)To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.d)To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?a)To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.b)To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.c)To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.d)To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?a)To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.b)To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.c)To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.d)To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?a)To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.b)To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.c)To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.d)To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?a)To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.b)To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.c)To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.d)To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?a)To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.b)To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.c)To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.d)To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?a)To protect the reputation of celebrities involved in defamation cases.b)To promote the right to freedom of the press without restrictions.c)To ensure that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously.d)To prevent media outlets from facing defamation suits in the digital realm.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev