Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An article on a modest blog made the claim that a well-known business magnate was complicit in a major tax fraud scheme. The blog used unnamed sources and did not perform any fact-checking on the data. The blog is being sued by the business tycoon for defamation. What legal rule is most likely to influence the courts judgment?a)If media outlets rely on anonymous sources, they are shielded from libel lawsuits.b)Information can be freely published on online platforms without risk of legal repercussions.c)Even when using anonymous sources, media organizations must make sure that the information is reliable and verified.d)Media organizations can only be held accountable for defamation if the incorrect material was intentionally publicized.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An article on a modest blog made the claim that a well-known business magnate was complicit in a major tax fraud scheme. The blog used unnamed sources and did not perform any fact-checking on the data. The blog is being sued by the business tycoon for defamation. What legal rule is most likely to influence the courts judgment?a)If media outlets rely on anonymous sources, they are shielded from libel lawsuits.b)Information can be freely published on online platforms without risk of legal repercussions.c)Even when using anonymous sources, media organizations must make sure that the information is reliable and verified.d)Media organizations can only be held accountable for defamation if the incorrect material was intentionally publicized.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An article on a modest blog made the claim that a well-known business magnate was complicit in a major tax fraud scheme. The blog used unnamed sources and did not perform any fact-checking on the data. The blog is being sued by the business tycoon for defamation. What legal rule is most likely to influence the courts judgment?a)If media outlets rely on anonymous sources, they are shielded from libel lawsuits.b)Information can be freely published on online platforms without risk of legal repercussions.c)Even when using anonymous sources, media organizations must make sure that the information is reliable and verified.d)Media organizations can only be held accountable for defamation if the incorrect material was intentionally publicized.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An article on a modest blog made the claim that a well-known business magnate was complicit in a major tax fraud scheme. The blog used unnamed sources and did not perform any fact-checking on the data. The blog is being sued by the business tycoon for defamation. What legal rule is most likely to influence the courts judgment?a)If media outlets rely on anonymous sources, they are shielded from libel lawsuits.b)Information can be freely published on online platforms without risk of legal repercussions.c)Even when using anonymous sources, media organizations must make sure that the information is reliable and verified.d)Media organizations can only be held accountable for defamation if the incorrect material was intentionally publicized.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An article on a modest blog made the claim that a well-known business magnate was complicit in a major tax fraud scheme. The blog used unnamed sources and did not perform any fact-checking on the data. The blog is being sued by the business tycoon for defamation. What legal rule is most likely to influence the courts judgment?a)If media outlets rely on anonymous sources, they are shielded from libel lawsuits.b)Information can be freely published on online platforms without risk of legal repercussions.c)Even when using anonymous sources, media organizations must make sure that the information is reliable and verified.d)Media organizations can only be held accountable for defamation if the incorrect material was intentionally publicized.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An article on a modest blog made the claim that a well-known business magnate was complicit in a major tax fraud scheme. The blog used unnamed sources and did not perform any fact-checking on the data. The blog is being sued by the business tycoon for defamation. What legal rule is most likely to influence the courts judgment?a)If media outlets rely on anonymous sources, they are shielded from libel lawsuits.b)Information can be freely published on online platforms without risk of legal repercussions.c)Even when using anonymous sources, media organizations must make sure that the information is reliable and verified.d)Media organizations can only be held accountable for defamation if the incorrect material was intentionally publicized.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An article on a modest blog made the claim that a well-known business magnate was complicit in a major tax fraud scheme. The blog used unnamed sources and did not perform any fact-checking on the data. The blog is being sued by the business tycoon for defamation. What legal rule is most likely to influence the courts judgment?a)If media outlets rely on anonymous sources, they are shielded from libel lawsuits.b)Information can be freely published on online platforms without risk of legal repercussions.c)Even when using anonymous sources, media organizations must make sure that the information is reliable and verified.d)Media organizations can only be held accountable for defamation if the incorrect material was intentionally publicized.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An article on a modest blog made the claim that a well-known business magnate was complicit in a major tax fraud scheme. The blog used unnamed sources and did not perform any fact-checking on the data. The blog is being sued by the business tycoon for defamation. What legal rule is most likely to influence the courts judgment?a)If media outlets rely on anonymous sources, they are shielded from libel lawsuits.b)Information can be freely published on online platforms without risk of legal repercussions.c)Even when using anonymous sources, media organizations must make sure that the information is reliable and verified.d)Media organizations can only be held accountable for defamation if the incorrect material was intentionally publicized.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An article on a modest blog made the claim that a well-known business magnate was complicit in a major tax fraud scheme. The blog used unnamed sources and did not perform any fact-checking on the data. The blog is being sued by the business tycoon for defamation. What legal rule is most likely to influence the courts judgment?a)If media outlets rely on anonymous sources, they are shielded from libel lawsuits.b)Information can be freely published on online platforms without risk of legal repercussions.c)Even when using anonymous sources, media organizations must make sure that the information is reliable and verified.d)Media organizations can only be held accountable for defamation if the incorrect material was intentionally publicized.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.