All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CLAT Exam  >  CLAT Questions  >  Direction: Read the following passage careful... Start Learning for Free
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.
A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them.  The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.
Q. A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?
  • a)
    The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.
  • b)
    It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.
  • c)
    In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.
  • d)
    After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CLAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questio...
In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom. Hence option C is the correct answer.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Similar CLAT Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An article on a modest blog made the claim that a well-known business magnate was complicit in a major tax fraud scheme. The blog used unnamed sources and did not perform any fact-checking on the data. The blog is being sued by the business tycoon for defamation. What legal rule is most likely to influence the courts judgment?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.An amusing report about a well-known donor that implied they were covertly supporting a circus of trained squirrels was published on a satirical news website. The philanthropist has sued for defamation on the grounds that the piece has damaged their reputation. What rule of law is most likely to influence the courts judgment in this case?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.Why did the Supreme Court rule that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.In the recent Supreme Court ruling on defamation in the digital realm, what did the Court emphasize regarding the freedom of the press?

While the rhetoric of collective responsibility to achieve "ambitious outcomes" in terms of climate action to address the "climate emergency" stands questioned in the 25th Conference of Parties, the grim realities of the inequalities between countries and the evasion of responsibilities and commitments by the developed countries point towards the fundamental role and continued importance of the United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change that remains wider in its scope and broader in its vision than the Paris Agreement.The developed countries are also seeking to manipulate the science policy interface in an attempt to sideline the equity and climate justice-related perspectives of the developing countries.The 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the annual climate summit of the countries that are signatories to the Convention, recently concluded at Madrid in December 2019. Instead of being hailed as a milestone, almost universally, it has been held to be a failure. A remarkable range of opinions appears to concur on this view, from the United Nations Secretary General to a number of governments, including the European Union and some of the small island states, and a range of nongovernmental organizations, including some of the biggest international players.Referring to the year-long wave of public action preceding COP25, especially by students and youth in the developed countries, this narrative of failure has held all countries responsible for the lack of "ambitious" outcomes adequate to dealing with the "climate emergency." While some accounts have justifiably noted the role of the United States in the overall outcome, others have also targeted Brazil, and China, and even India by innuendo. This narrative of collective responsibility for the outcome has dominated the global media too and has been uncritically echoed in the national media in countries like India.But if COP25 was indeed the failure it is perhaps justifiably held to be, why indeed did it fail and what precisely was the anatomy of the failure? Despite the incessant rhetoric of "ambition" to face the "climate emergency," why indeed were the outcomes so meagre, and where does the responsibility lie?Unfortunately, the understanding of the challenge of global warming has been made considerably more difficult by the widespread tendency to ignore the reality of the grossly unequal world in which we live. The UNFCCC recognizes this in its explicit articulation of the principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities as the basis for climate action, and thus, calls on the developed countries to take the lead. However, all too often the argument is made that these principles and their implementation in the differentiation between developed and developing countries in climate action has somehow become outdated.Q. Which of the following did not hail the 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change as a failure?

Top Courses for CLATView all

Top Courses for CLAT

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?a)The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.b)It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.c)In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.d)After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?a)The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.b)It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.c)In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.d)After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?a)The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.b)It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.c)In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.d)After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?a)The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.b)It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.c)In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.d)After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?a)The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.b)It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.c)In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.d)After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?a)The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.b)It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.c)In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.d)After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?a)The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.b)It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.c)In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.d)After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?a)The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.b)It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.c)In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.d)After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?a)The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.b)It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.c)In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.d)After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.A recent Supreme Court ruling has addressed the issue of defamation in the digital realm. The case involved a celebrity who filed a defamation suit against an online news portal for publishing false and damaging information about them. The Supreme Court held that while freedom of press is a fundamental right, it is not an absolute right and must be balanced with the right to reputation. The Court noted that online platforms can reach a global audience instantaneously, amplifying the potential harm caused by defamatory content. The Court ruled that media outlets are responsible for verifying the accuracy of information before publishing it, and they cannot escape liability by merely invoking the right to freedom of press.Q.A well-known politician allegedly accepted payments from a foreign government, according to a report published on an online news website. The news portal is being sued for slander by the politician. Which rule would the court most likely use in this situation?a)The freedom of the press is an unalienable right that shields media organizations from libel lawsuits.b)It is not the responsibility of media outlets to confirm the veracity of material before publishing it.c)In order to prevent defamation, media outlets should verify facts and strike a balance between the right to reputation protection and press freedom.d)After the libelous material has been published, media outlets might absolve themselves of responsibility by releasing an apology.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
Explore Courses for CLAT exam

Top Courses for CLAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup