Question Description
Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.The District Court made a ruling in favor of Mr. Rajesh Gupta in a civil case involving Mr. Arjun Sharma and Mr. Gupta. Mr. Arjun Sharma appealed the judgement to the State Appellate Court because he was not happy with it. The State Appellate Court overturned the District Courts judgment and granted Mr. Arjun Sharma a judgment. Rajesh Gupta chooses to seek a second appeal with the High Court after being upset by this judgment.In Mr. Rajesh Guptas memorandum of appeal before the High Court, which of the following alternatives best expresses the basis that he should include?a)Whether it was incorrect for the State Appellate Court to overturn the District Courts ruling without properly taking into account the trials evidence.b)Whether the High Court may hear an appeal involving any important legal issue that was not raised by it, even if the lower courts have not taken it into consideration.c)Whether a second appeal can be brought before the High Court when the first lawsuits objective is to recoup Rs. 25,000.d)The High Courts ability to frame the appropriate questions for the appeal, even if the memorandum of appeal does not express the main legal issue.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2025 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.The District Court made a ruling in favor of Mr. Rajesh Gupta in a civil case involving Mr. Arjun Sharma and Mr. Gupta. Mr. Arjun Sharma appealed the judgement to the State Appellate Court because he was not happy with it. The State Appellate Court overturned the District Courts judgment and granted Mr. Arjun Sharma a judgment. Rajesh Gupta chooses to seek a second appeal with the High Court after being upset by this judgment.In Mr. Rajesh Guptas memorandum of appeal before the High Court, which of the following alternatives best expresses the basis that he should include?a)Whether it was incorrect for the State Appellate Court to overturn the District Courts ruling without properly taking into account the trials evidence.b)Whether the High Court may hear an appeal involving any important legal issue that was not raised by it, even if the lower courts have not taken it into consideration.c)Whether a second appeal can be brought before the High Court when the first lawsuits objective is to recoup Rs. 25,000.d)The High Courts ability to frame the appropriate questions for the appeal, even if the memorandum of appeal does not express the main legal issue.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.The District Court made a ruling in favor of Mr. Rajesh Gupta in a civil case involving Mr. Arjun Sharma and Mr. Gupta. Mr. Arjun Sharma appealed the judgement to the State Appellate Court because he was not happy with it. The State Appellate Court overturned the District Courts judgment and granted Mr. Arjun Sharma a judgment. Rajesh Gupta chooses to seek a second appeal with the High Court after being upset by this judgment.In Mr. Rajesh Guptas memorandum of appeal before the High Court, which of the following alternatives best expresses the basis that he should include?a)Whether it was incorrect for the State Appellate Court to overturn the District Courts ruling without properly taking into account the trials evidence.b)Whether the High Court may hear an appeal involving any important legal issue that was not raised by it, even if the lower courts have not taken it into consideration.c)Whether a second appeal can be brought before the High Court when the first lawsuits objective is to recoup Rs. 25,000.d)The High Courts ability to frame the appropriate questions for the appeal, even if the memorandum of appeal does not express the main legal issue.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.The District Court made a ruling in favor of Mr. Rajesh Gupta in a civil case involving Mr. Arjun Sharma and Mr. Gupta. Mr. Arjun Sharma appealed the judgement to the State Appellate Court because he was not happy with it. The State Appellate Court overturned the District Courts judgment and granted Mr. Arjun Sharma a judgment. Rajesh Gupta chooses to seek a second appeal with the High Court after being upset by this judgment.In Mr. Rajesh Guptas memorandum of appeal before the High Court, which of the following alternatives best expresses the basis that he should include?a)Whether it was incorrect for the State Appellate Court to overturn the District Courts ruling without properly taking into account the trials evidence.b)Whether the High Court may hear an appeal involving any important legal issue that was not raised by it, even if the lower courts have not taken it into consideration.c)Whether a second appeal can be brought before the High Court when the first lawsuits objective is to recoup Rs. 25,000.d)The High Courts ability to frame the appropriate questions for the appeal, even if the memorandum of appeal does not express the main legal issue.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.The District Court made a ruling in favor of Mr. Rajesh Gupta in a civil case involving Mr. Arjun Sharma and Mr. Gupta. Mr. Arjun Sharma appealed the judgement to the State Appellate Court because he was not happy with it. The State Appellate Court overturned the District Courts judgment and granted Mr. Arjun Sharma a judgment. Rajesh Gupta chooses to seek a second appeal with the High Court after being upset by this judgment.In Mr. Rajesh Guptas memorandum of appeal before the High Court, which of the following alternatives best expresses the basis that he should include?a)Whether it was incorrect for the State Appellate Court to overturn the District Courts ruling without properly taking into account the trials evidence.b)Whether the High Court may hear an appeal involving any important legal issue that was not raised by it, even if the lower courts have not taken it into consideration.c)Whether a second appeal can be brought before the High Court when the first lawsuits objective is to recoup Rs. 25,000.d)The High Courts ability to frame the appropriate questions for the appeal, even if the memorandum of appeal does not express the main legal issue.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.The District Court made a ruling in favor of Mr. Rajesh Gupta in a civil case involving Mr. Arjun Sharma and Mr. Gupta. Mr. Arjun Sharma appealed the judgement to the State Appellate Court because he was not happy with it. The State Appellate Court overturned the District Courts judgment and granted Mr. Arjun Sharma a judgment. Rajesh Gupta chooses to seek a second appeal with the High Court after being upset by this judgment.In Mr. Rajesh Guptas memorandum of appeal before the High Court, which of the following alternatives best expresses the basis that he should include?a)Whether it was incorrect for the State Appellate Court to overturn the District Courts ruling without properly taking into account the trials evidence.b)Whether the High Court may hear an appeal involving any important legal issue that was not raised by it, even if the lower courts have not taken it into consideration.c)Whether a second appeal can be brought before the High Court when the first lawsuits objective is to recoup Rs. 25,000.d)The High Courts ability to frame the appropriate questions for the appeal, even if the memorandum of appeal does not express the main legal issue.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.The District Court made a ruling in favor of Mr. Rajesh Gupta in a civil case involving Mr. Arjun Sharma and Mr. Gupta. Mr. Arjun Sharma appealed the judgement to the State Appellate Court because he was not happy with it. The State Appellate Court overturned the District Courts judgment and granted Mr. Arjun Sharma a judgment. Rajesh Gupta chooses to seek a second appeal with the High Court after being upset by this judgment.In Mr. Rajesh Guptas memorandum of appeal before the High Court, which of the following alternatives best expresses the basis that he should include?a)Whether it was incorrect for the State Appellate Court to overturn the District Courts ruling without properly taking into account the trials evidence.b)Whether the High Court may hear an appeal involving any important legal issue that was not raised by it, even if the lower courts have not taken it into consideration.c)Whether a second appeal can be brought before the High Court when the first lawsuits objective is to recoup Rs. 25,000.d)The High Courts ability to frame the appropriate questions for the appeal, even if the memorandum of appeal does not express the main legal issue.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.The District Court made a ruling in favor of Mr. Rajesh Gupta in a civil case involving Mr. Arjun Sharma and Mr. Gupta. Mr. Arjun Sharma appealed the judgement to the State Appellate Court because he was not happy with it. The State Appellate Court overturned the District Courts judgment and granted Mr. Arjun Sharma a judgment. Rajesh Gupta chooses to seek a second appeal with the High Court after being upset by this judgment.In Mr. Rajesh Guptas memorandum of appeal before the High Court, which of the following alternatives best expresses the basis that he should include?a)Whether it was incorrect for the State Appellate Court to overturn the District Courts ruling without properly taking into account the trials evidence.b)Whether the High Court may hear an appeal involving any important legal issue that was not raised by it, even if the lower courts have not taken it into consideration.c)Whether a second appeal can be brought before the High Court when the first lawsuits objective is to recoup Rs. 25,000.d)The High Courts ability to frame the appropriate questions for the appeal, even if the memorandum of appeal does not express the main legal issue.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions.Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code provides that an appeal can be moved to the High Court from every decree passed in appeal by any subordinate Court if the High Court finds that the case includes a substantial question of law. Taking this into context, the memorandum of appeal must clearly state the substantial question of law in this appeal. If the High Court deems it to be satisfactory, it may go on to formulate the pertinent questions, based on which the appeal would be heard. Also, the High Court may hear the appeal on any other substantial question of law not formulated by it if it feels that the case involves such question. It may be noted that a second appeal is only meant for questions of law and hence cannot be made on the grounds of an erroneous finding of fact. On the same page, in the absence of any errors or defects in the procedure, the finding of the first appellate court will be considered as final, if the particular Court produces evidence to support its findings. In another important note, second appeals cannot be made for a decree if the subject matter of the original suit is intended to recover a sum of Rs. 25,000.Q.The District Court made a ruling in favor of Mr. Rajesh Gupta in a civil case involving Mr. Arjun Sharma and Mr. Gupta. Mr. Arjun Sharma appealed the judgement to the State Appellate Court because he was not happy with it. The State Appellate Court overturned the District Courts judgment and granted Mr. Arjun Sharma a judgment. Rajesh Gupta chooses to seek a second appeal with the High Court after being upset by this judgment.In Mr. Rajesh Guptas memorandum of appeal before the High Court, which of the following alternatives best expresses the basis that he should include?a)Whether it was incorrect for the State Appellate Court to overturn the District Courts ruling without properly taking into account the trials evidence.b)Whether the High Court may hear an appeal involving any important legal issue that was not raised by it, even if the lower courts have not taken it into consideration.c)Whether a second appeal can be brought before the High Court when the first lawsuits objective is to recoup Rs. 25,000.d)The High Courts ability to frame the appropriate questions for the appeal, even if the memorandum of appeal does not express the main legal issue.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.